735 New Cases, 3 New Hospitalizations

COVID-19 featureToday has the largest number of positive COVID cases in one day. Yesterday’s 840 new cases was the largest ever and came after a three day weekend.

Press release from Humboldt County Public Health:

Humboldt County Public Health reported today three new hospitalizations due to COVID-19, a resident in their 30s, one in their 50s and another in their 60s. An additional 735 new cases were also reported, bringing to 14,493 the total number of residents who have tested positive for the virus. No new deaths were reported.

As of Tuesday, Public Health and other local vaccinators have administered a total of 172,124 doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Local vaccination data has been updated on the Humboldt County Data Dashboard. Highlights include:

  • Since the last weekly report on Jan. 12, a total of 1,096 vaccine doses were administered, and 509 additional residents completed their vaccine series.
  • Just over 63% of the county’s total population was fully vaccinated as of Tuesday.
  • A total of 85,881 residents, or approximately 72% of the county’s vaccine-eligible population aged 5 and older, were fully vaccinated. Approximately 7% of the population aged 5 and older have been partially vaccinated as of this reporting period.

Public Health officials continue to stress that people who are fully vaccinated or boosted typically develop milder symptoms, experience shorter illness duration and have fewer hospitalizations and less severe outcomes. Local data shows that unvaccinated adults in Humboldt County are 13 times more likely to be hospitalized than those adults who are fully vaccinated.

Individuals, particularly those who are not vaccinated, should take steps to limit exposure, wear a well-fitted mask in indoor public spaces, distance six feet from others when possible and avoid crowds and poorly ventilated spaces.

To increase testing capacity in response to the recent surge in cases, the federal government is providing four at-home COVID tests for each household. These can be ordered online, free of charge, at COVIDTests.gov.

Additionally, as of Jan. 15, federal law requires health insurers to cover up-front costs of at-home COVID-19 tests purchased at pharmacies or retailers, or allows individuals to be reimbursed for up to eight home tests per month. Information is available at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website.

As always, Humboldt County’s vaccination and testing services are available free of charge. Although walk-ins are allowed at most regular Public Health clinics and many pharmacy vaccination sites, an increase in demand for boosters has caused delays at some locations. As a result, appointments are required for pediatric clinics and for clinics at Public Health’s main office. Appointments are strongly recommended for all other clinics and are the best way to ensure a shot is available during your visit. Appointments can be made at MyTurn.ca.gov.

Vaccines, including boosters, are available at local pharmacies. To check the availability of a specific vaccine, visit the vaccines.gov page, or text your ZIP code to 438829 to locate a nearby pharmacy offering vaccines.

See the schedule below for specific Public Health vaccination and testing clinic dates, times, locations and available services. Questions about clinic services can be directed to the Joint Information Center at 1-707-441-5000.

Hoopa — Thursday, Jan. 20, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Hoopa Fire Hall (11121 Hwy 96)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
No rapid testing available at this clinic. PCR testing offered through OptumServe by appointment only at the Hoopa Fire Hall.
Appointments for vaccinations strongly recommended.

Eureka — Friday, Jan. 21, 1 to 8 p.m. – FULL
Wharfinger Building (1 Marina Way)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
No rapid testing available at this clinic. PCR testing offered through OptumServe by appointment on the lower floor of the Wharfinger Building.
Appointments for vaccinations strongly recommended.

Fortuna — Saturday, Jan. 22, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Fortuna Veterans Hall (1426 Main St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing available on a first-come first-served basis
Appointments for vaccinations strongly recommended.

Fortuna — Sunday, Jan. 23, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Walker Elementary School (2089 Newburg Road)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing available on a first-come first-served basis
Appointments for vaccinations strongly recommended.

Eureka — Monday, Jan. 24, 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Closed from noon to 1 p.m.
Public Health Main Office (529 I St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
No testing available
$25 gift card for adults receiving a first or second dose
Appointments required.

Eureka — Tuesday, Jan. 25, 9 to 11:30 a.m.
Public Health Main Office (529 I St.)
Ages 12 and older
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
No testing available
$25 gift card for adults receiving a first or second dose
Appointments required.

Eureka Pediatric Clinic — Tuesday, Jan. 25, 1:15 to 3:45 p.m.
Public Health Main Office (529 I St.)
Ages 5 to 11
Pfizer only
No testing available
Appointments required.

Willow Creek — Tuesday, Jan. 25, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Closed from noon to 1 p.m.
Public Health Office (77 Walnut Way)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing available on a first-come first-served basis
$25 gift card for adults receiving a first or second dose
Appointments for vaccinations strongly recommended.

Eureka — Wednesday, Jan. 26, 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Marshall Resource Center (2100 J St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing available on a first-come first-served basis
Appointments for vaccinations strongly recommended.

View the Data Dashboard online at humboldtgov.org/dashboard, or go to humboldtgov.org/DashboardArchives to download data from a previous time. For the most recent COVID-19 information, visit cdc.gov or cdph.ca.gov. Local information is available at humboldtgov.org or by contacting [email protected] or calling 1-707-441-5000.

Sign up for COVID-19 vaccination: MyTurn.ca.gov
Check for vaccine availability at a local pharmacy: Vaccines.gov
Local COVID-19 vaccine information: humboldtgov.org/VaccineInfo
Humboldt County COVID-19 Data Dashboard: humboldtgov.org/Dashboard
Follow us on Facebook: @HumCoCOVID19
Instagram: @HumCoCOVID19
Twitter: @HumCoCOVID19
Humboldt Health Alert: humboldtgov.org/HumboldtHealthAlert

PLEASE NOTE: Some of the numbers related to how many have been fully vaccinated as stated in this article is incorrect. We’re working to get the correct numbers from Public Health. These will be posted at a later date.

UPDATE: RHBB Reader Discovers DHHS Vaccination Calculation Erro

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

152 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago

The Way
To realize that you do not understand is a virtue; Not to realize that you do not understand is a defect.

Lao Tzu

D08016F7-4084-42EB-A6A5-92235DA00DF8.jpeg
Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Children are hospitalized with Covid at record numbers
Some younger patients are found to be Covid-positive through routine screening, but a worrisome number are experiencing severe complications of the coronavirus, doctors say.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-warning-symptoms-children-kids-hospitalized-record-numbers-rcna10741
The dashboard shows 356 tests yet 735 positive cases? Did they mix the numbers up?

Last edited 2 years ago
Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

🕯🌳I’ve been telling them. 🖖🖖

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Well Willie, I see Biden pledged full steam ahead today, no course correction needed. Why would he expect a different outcome if he keeps doing the same thing? It’s literally the definition of insanity.

moviedad
Member
moviedad
2 years ago

Didn’t mean to “vote.” Up or down. Weird.

Liberty Biberty
Guest
Liberty Biberty
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Severe worry is the complication

wally
Guest
wally
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Seems like we started to give the children the shot just in the nick of time.

Antiwoke
Guest
Antiwoke
2 years ago
Reply to  wally

Thank Pfizer above for saving our children… Derp

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  wally

You mean that as a facetious comment given child vaccinations began and covid hospitalizations followed?

Last edited 2 years ago
Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

50 yrs and older 780,000 dead, under 17 , 710 dead . Whenever someone posts covid being an issue for the younger crowd, it is a lie. Is it for drama? What’s the purpose? You believe every news report you hear?

Al L Ivesmatr
Guest
Al L Ivesmatr
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Yep. Dr. Malone outlined and spelled out the whole situation on the Joe Rogan podcast. The top expert in American vaccines who also worked for Jonas Salk. Lao Tzu would consider him god.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Al L Ivesmatr

A fairly standard late-night Fox News cable segment featuring self-described “COVID Contrarian” Alex Berenson and infamous anti-vaxxer Robert Malone skidded off the tracks after the former accused the latter of overplaying his hand. “Listen, I don’t think Dr. Malone does himself or those of us who are trying to raise questions about the vaccines any favors, when he refers to himself as the inventor of the mRNA technology,” argued Berenson. “That is clearly a large exaggeration. And I don’t think he does us any favors, when he says that ivermectin has been proven to work. I think that is a huge overstatement of the case.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-favorite-anti-vaxxer-guests-alex-berenson-and-robert-malone-are-at-war

Last edited 2 years ago
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Covid lockdowns were the biggest mistake the US has made since Bush invaded Itaq. We should’ve had the at risk Americans shelter at home, help these get through, and the rest of us just go about our lives normally, acquiring natural immunity as the opportunity presents itself.

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago

🕯🌳Does the present of Soviet troops at the Ukraine broader a cause for concern?🖖🖖

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Should a country that won’t defend its own border concern itself with foreign ones?

Cornpop
Guest
Cornpop
2 years ago
Reply to  I like stars

This… 👍🏼

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  I like stars

🕯🌳We defend ourselves pretty well. When was the last time we were attacked across any of our borders?🖖🖖

Cornpop
Guest
Cornpop
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Daily? They’re not attacking us with bullets but sucking tax dollars down ravenously.

seabreeze
Guest
seabreeze
2 years ago
Reply to  I like stars

Great question🔺

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  I like stars

Good point.

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

No, Ukraine is not of strategic importance to the US. Plus, the Russians have nuclear weapons so a confrontation between us has risk of getting wildly out of control – Armageddon, end of world, out of control.

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Biden said that while he believes an invasion is imminent, the United States is prepared to impose significant economic consequences should Russia move forward. But, he clarified, a “minor incursion” by the Russians would elicit a softer response from the U.S. than that of a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Nooo
Guest
Nooo
2 years ago

Anti vaxxers and anti government types would have complained about that too. Unfortunately, with YouTube being the bible for so many of the anti vaxxers, a good share of the “at risk” population were convinced they were not at risk anyway from the “plandemic”. Even if they do, some yahoo will make a point of roving their indepence by refusing to take care in their presence.

No country on earth did that, not even the anti government fantasy of Sweden. Those who did more of that, relied on coorperation of their citizenry to voluntarily follow guide lines that in essence were voluntary lockdowns. Even then at first they lost a larger share of their older population because, while good at allowing citizens much independence, they did not protect the vulnerable so well at all. They learned along the way. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875012/#:~:text=In%20several%20countries%20that%20did%20very%20well%20in,facilities%29%20were%20not%20contributing%20many%20fatalities%20%28Ioannidis%2C%202021%29.

Besides, omicron doesn’t seem to recognize immunity for very long, whether by infection or vaccination.

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

The “at risk” would have needed to voluntarily isolate, of course not forced.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

I’d like to hear what you have to say as far as today’s 206.46% positivity rate…

You know 735 positives, out of 356 tests…

This should be interesting…

At some point one would think, that one would think that the County of Humboldt absolutely must be making a mistake…

(Facetious font);

Sincerely,

Dr. Charlatan.

Last edited 2 years ago
thatguyinarcata
Guest
thatguyinarcata
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

means we’re gonna need 200% vaccination rate if we’re ever gonna kick this thing

Connie DobbsD
Member
Connie Dobbs
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

Nope. Youtube bans vax disinformation; therefore everything it leaves on its platform is prima facie the truth. You just hate truth.

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Connie Dobbs

🕯🌳About as much as you do. 🖖🖖

Connie DobbsD
Member
Connie Dobbs
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

I beleive you found a boxcar full of valuable first editions.

Rimme
Guest
Rimme
2 years ago

The most unwise covid “we shoulda” ever said on local social media.

Misguidedyouth
Guest
Misguidedyouth
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Malone is not an antibaxxet

Al L Ivesmatr
Guest
Al L Ivesmatr
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Dr.Malone worked for and with Jonas Salk, internecine bickering is not relevant. Facts matter.

Haus Boss
Guest
Haus Boss
2 years ago
Reply to  Al L Ivesmatr

The top expert in American vaccines? He played a pivotal part in VERY EARLY mRNA vaccine technology, but he’s by no means the “father” of mRNA vaccines. We got to where we are by decades of work and research teams.

Funny thing is if you google “dr robert malone” the second result in Google is from Politifact. It’s a shame that another once respected physician has gone down the rabbit and become a complete sham/scam artist.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jan/06/who-robert-malone-joe-rogans-guest-was-vaccine-sci/

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

The county has a defect.

brian
Guest
brian
2 years ago

Wow – 735 people tested positive for having been exposed to the flu / the common cold.

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  brian

And most have immunity, either vaccine or natural, both work.

New data released Wednesday showed that both vaccination and prior infection offered strong protection against infection and hospitalization from Covid-19 during the Delta wave — and that case and hospitalization rates were actually lower among people who had recovered from Covid-19 than among those who had been vaccinated.

The data, released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and health agencies in California and New York, are sure to inflame arguments from those who insist they don’t need to be vaccinated if they can show they’ve recovered from Covid-19.

Last edited 2 years ago
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

But my results are from the CDC and published today. Natural immunity found to be at least as good as vaccine immunity. BTW, did you see Israel decided vaccines were no benefit in the omicron fight, stop bothering with them?

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago

Read the article

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Your article

This is why some countries, including the member states of the European Union, treat documented recovery from COVID-19 as functionally the same as vaccination in their “vaccine passport” systems. 

Still, vaccine-induced immunity is a better choice, not because it produces a stronger immunity, but because it enables you to get the immunity without the side effects and risks that come along with illness

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago

Good you read the article.

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago

Right, you can just experience the side effects and risks that come along with the vaccine, instead.

rollin
Guest
rollin
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Exactly

Nooo
Guest
Nooo
2 years ago

Except for the higher risk to health and life acquiring it. And if you think Israel decided that, then provide a link. Not just an anti vax wishful thinking.
” Israeli Health Minister Nachman Ash said the fourth dose still offers protection from serious morbidity, especially for the elderly and at-risk population, and encouraged citizens to keep getting vaccinated.” https://news.yahoo.com/israel-sticks-fourth-vaccine-shot-121749962.html

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

Nooo, nooo, nooo, that is a misquote, according to Reuters, for what it’s worth, and you left out the most pertinent part from your own link, out of your comment…

Here is the actual quote from Nachman Ash…per Reuters…

Screenshot_20220120-092000.png
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

Here is the pertinent part from your link that you elected to not include, nooo.

And let’s not forget, they are talking about a FOURTH shot not working sufficiently well, not a THIRD shot. So, our booster, a third shot, would equate to even less protection against Omicron…

And he refers to the elderly, most at risk, so referencing the “community” (in the Yahoo misquote you linked to), to get vaccinated (with the fourth dose), is technically and literally, misinformation.

Screenshot_20220120-100405.png
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Didn’t Omicron upend what we thought we knew about vaccine induced immunity, as well?

Hugh ManateeD
Member
2 years ago

This may be incorrect.
The actual county release said 735 cases out of 356 tests, which of course is impossible, so either they flip-flopped the numbers and it is 356 positives out of 735 tests or they forgot a 1 or something on the 356. Maybe it was 1356 tests given? Either way it’s a lot of positives!

Last edited 2 years ago
Grumpy Old Grunt
Member
Grumpy Old Grunt
2 years ago
Reply to  Hugh Manatee

It takes a few days to get results. Poor County data count. Today results came in from those tested in the past.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

If anybody is interested you can get some good Humboldt County data here. Humboldt is up in a lot of categories, according to the 7 day metric stats.
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#county-view?list_select_county=06023

Last edited 2 years ago
Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

🕯🌳Thank you for that information by the way. 🖖🖖

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Yep, and then plug in State and County. It makes it very clear that the County of Humboldt is making a mistake, has been making a mistake for 2 1/2 months, and exactly what that mistake is…

Hugh ManateeD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I understand that, but are you saying the reported number of tests given is not derived from the sum of positive tests and negative tests that they receive the results for on any given day?

I don’t understand why that would be the case.
If you get back 700 positive results and 700 negative results on Wednesday, even if those are results of tests that were taken 3-7 days ago, you would report that as 700 positive tests out of 1400 tests taken.

Are you claiming the county reports the positive results that they receive from prior tests as the “‘positive test” number, but then report the “‘tests given” as the tests they actually conducted that day that they haven’t received results for yet? That would be quite illogical and confusing. Maybe I’m not understanding what you are saying.

Last edited 2 years ago
Juan Pablo
Member
Juan Pablo
2 years ago
Reply to  Hugh Manatee

Yes, that is correct. Positive cases reported today (could be from multiple days 4-7 days prior), tests given (one day, today)

Hugh ManateeD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Juan Pablo

I find that hard to believe.
If that is true, then the County Health Dept. is grossly inept.
If you are comparing results from the previous week to tests given that day, and then listing that comparison as “percent of positive” is a meaningless and misleading statistic.

I don’t believe the County is that clueless and find it much more likely this was simply an error in the numbers given.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Hugh Manatee

Well said.

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Hugh Manatee

Although “illogical and confusing”, that’s apparently how our county reports data if these numbers stand.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Hugh Manatee

Yep, coming to any accurate conclusions, based on a wacky presentation of data, kind of goes out the window, doesn’t it?

It doesn’t make any sense.

Why even do it that way?
Why not wait a week, and actually get it right?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

212 positive antigen tests since yesterday. Not sure how that plays in, or how many total antigen tests that represents, but antigen tests may not be included in the other type of test count.

Be that as it may, it still doesn’t add up.

🤔🧐What does that mean the positivity rate is? 😜🤪😁

735 cases out of 356 tests would be a 206.46% test positivity rate.

Nothing to question there.

🤔🧐Totally believable.🤪😜😁

I’ll check what the county positivity rate is on the dashboard, and maybe that will help solve this mystery…

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Kym,
The county says 33.63% positivity rate for the last week…

I think it said last updated on 1/14/2022…

I agree with Hugh Manatee.

I think 356 is an error, and it is probably supposed to be 1,356 tests… That would result in a similar positivity rate as what it was from the day before…

Add the 1,000 tests, it would be 54.20%. I think that is in the realm of what it was yesterday.

I can’t believe, (actually I can), that anyone could defend a 206.46% positivity rate, and not even question the County numbers, when they are so far out of kilter, that they can’t even be possible.

That appears to be simply blind allegiance.

A 100% positivity rate is the upper limit of reality for a positivity rate. I’m 100% positive of that. And that’s the upper limit.

And speaking of blind allegiance, the County has still not corrected it’s ongoing error of the percentage of eligible residents fully vaccinated…

It’s actually getting totally comical at this point.

I will research what the current CDC numbers are, and you can decide if the allegiance should remain with the county, or if it belongs with the CDC.

And I will repeat, the “approximately 72% of eligible…fully vaccinated” is not for the 5 and up, it’s for the 12 and up. It’s another county error.

And it’s getting old.

Believing the 72% figure is just more blind allegiance.

Hugh ManateeD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Oh good, it’s not just me!🤣🤣🤣

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Then there’s home tests – counted or not?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago

Good question, but why add something logical to something illogical?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

The county is still making an error in the percentage of eligible population, 5 and up fully vaccinated. They continue to give the percentage for the 12 and up.

There are about 10,000 less in the 12 and up group, so it drives the percentage up, due to the mistaken they keep making.

They never did adjust properly when we shifted from the eligible being 12 and up, to the eligible being 5 and up.

As you can see in the CDC data from yesterday, the county is, and has been, making a mistake…

So, take your pick, do you believe the County of Humboldt, or do you believe the CDC?

Which would you wager, is making the mistake?

Screenshot_20220119-213321.png
Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Old Chinese proverb: Give man link, man discover many things…

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Not how I found it.

Confucius say, never assume.

You probably know the rest…

Someone posted a similar chart in the past, I can’t recall who it was. Maybe it was you?

So I knew it could be found, and kept looking, until I found it.

I do appreciate the link though, I will save it, so the information will be easier to find next time, and then your proverb may be true…

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Yes it was me. I posted the screenshot, of the same thing u just posted. You were so stoked, that you finally had proof of what you were saying. I also posted the link back then but later deleted it.

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

I sure was, thank you, but you didn’t post a link that day on where you found it…

And I wasn’t totally sure I remembered correctly that it was you. What it was that I was so jazzed about was that the chart clearly showed that not only the county has been making a mistake, it corroborated exactly what it was, exactly what I have been saying it was.

But, alas, it still is inadequate proof for Kym, that the published data is actually misinformation, and that it is ongoing, and has been for months.

And we clearly didn’t achieve 70% fully vaccinated for the total population, or the eligible population, 5 and up, by January 15, 2022, just like I said wouldn’t happen, over two months ago.

Not. Even. Close.

It’s the 19th.

The CDC says we are at, 63.4%

The county says we are at 63.18%.

That’s a long way from 70%.

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Count those that were infected and recovered, like European countries, and we’re probably 85-90%

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Confucius say, add 5-11 year olds to the eligibility, and fully vaccinated percentage should go down…

I anticipated that happening, as it should have, but it never did, and that’s when I “discovered” it.

My discovery had nothing to do with your chart. Your recent chart only proved my 2 1/2 months old “discovery”.

It did, however, corroborate it.

I had illustrated it already, in every possible way…

Not sure why you would want to take any credit for my discovery.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Right you got peer reviewed, which is needed to corroborate any study. So yes I deserve some credit. Of course if it turns out there is a logical explanation to all this, I will deny all responsibility.

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

So, you were peer reviewing my peer review of the County’s errant data that I was conducting?

And you deserve credit?

Does that even make sense?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Hofmann is correct in that 76% of the eligible, 5 and up, have at least one dose…

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I don’t think that they will mix up the daily results as they pertain to the daily tests, do you?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

That shouldn’t have affected the last two week’s case graphs, though, those were only up to 1/2/2022, over two weeks old.

All pertinent results should have been in for those graphs, even with a 7 day delay in results bring returned….

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago

🕯🌳The vaccine was designed to protect older people and as time went on the virus jumped evolving into different varieties trying to find a way to survive now it’s found a new host and I believe it’s children. 🖖🖖

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

99.5% of positive cases didn’t even require hospitalizion (3/735)

Last edited 2 years ago
Mega me
Guest
Mega me
2 years ago

Imagine being gaslight to the point where the vaccine was pitched as a way to stop the spread and now it isn’t but you’re in a cult and can’t remember 5 minutes ago

Connie DobbsD
Member
Connie Dobbs
2 years ago
Reply to  Mega me

Brain fog’s a side effect. It’ll help the midterm campaigns if the electorate develops the memory retention of some of your dumber goldfish.

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago

🕯🌳Ah something we agree on mir.🖖🖖

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago

I got a better one for you to ponder, mlr… Apparently…

51.6% of positive cases DIDN’T EVEN REQUIRE A TEST (379/735)

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Yes and what people are not taking into account is that Omicron has not peaked and that’s weeks away. Also long term effects in children is being studied. Nobody knows..

LETTING GO
Guest
LETTING GO
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Well, it must be Akin to commenting the same behavior in the same manner everyday.

At some point, it becomes just white noise.

Then you have to ask yourself if all that energy was worth it.

Not really sure if I trust the experts anyway.

Lots of God complex’s

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

🕯🌳I agree. I watch what its doing around the world. Most variants start in foreign countries. 🖖🖖

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Which variants started domestically?

fishkiller
Guest
fishkiller
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

UNC Chapel Hill is in North Carolina. Ralph Baric’s lab involved in creation of original.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  fishkiller

Yep, and there have been “incidents” there, as well…

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  fishkiller

🕯🌳Orginally what?🖖🖖

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Biden’s free test kits are weeks away too.

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago

🕯🌳So how’s it feel to have him live in your head rent free. 🖖🖖

Liberty Biberty
Guest
Liberty Biberty
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

We probably shouldn’t be giving our children an experimental injection either. Long-term effects are being studied about this injection also. Nobody knows

Nooo
Guest
Nooo
2 years ago

Nobody knows what infection does either. It’s not like choosing no risk over some risk. It more choosing one risk or another. Doing nothing is a choice with risks too. The study of that is just starting. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/long-term-study-children-covid-19-begins

So many long term health problems have turned out to be related to infections that seemed mild or less to full recovery but left hidden problems. For example, “Worldwide, infections are linked to about 15% to 20% of cancers. ”
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/infectious-agents/infections-that-can-lead-to-cancer/intro.html

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

Oh the term problems, any chance I can get a check for this long term covid made me cough, crack me up. It’s just another virus, so traumatic.

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

Covid causes cancer??

rollin
Guest
rollin
2 years ago

Right? LOL! Wow! What will the next claim be, that the “vaccines” work.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  rollin

Yep, not until right after the fourth dose, though, apparently.

rollin
Guest
rollin
2 years ago
Reply to  Nooo

“It’s not like choosing no risk over some risk”

Why, if someone were in a low risk group (vast majority of planet), would they take the risk of an experimental “vaccine” that doesn’t work (you were wrong)? You are going to contract the virus and it’s side effects anyway (so much for 95% efficacy). No need to drink the Kool-Aid and join the cult.

Jean Lopez
Guest
Jean Lopez
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Not peaked? Does Boris know this? The UK has thrown in the towel.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Jean Lopez

I live in the United States. Don’t know about you people in the UK

Last edited 2 years ago
Connie DobbsD
Member
Connie Dobbs
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Don’t worry, those people are like you and will never travel.

Angela Robinson
Member
Angela Robinson
2 years ago
Reply to  Jean Lopez

I think Boris will do anything to bring up his poll numbers. Partygate is killing him.

FogDog
Guest
FogDog
2 years ago

We all get corona virus!

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
2 years ago
Reply to  FogDog

Finally , two years later some are figuring it out. Pro-tip , your not going to stop the flu.

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago

🕯🌳Boo 🖖🖖

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago

Actually it’s 66.8%, the chart from the CDC, I have posted below, and I had a heck of a time finding it…

It’s definitely not “approximately 72%”, like the County of Humboldt claims.

So, do you agree the County of Humboldt is full of horseshit about this, and have been for 2 1/2 months now?

I wish someone would call the county in this ongoing error, and discontinue publishing this clear error, until it is corrected.

It is misinformation, it needs to be fact checked, it has been debunked, and the incorrect information needs to be discarded.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Beetlejuice, you are up to your old tricks again, deleting your 67% comment, so that my reply gets iced.

An old and tiresome grey fox maneuver.

Well played.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I have no idea what you are talking about. Me deleting something does not effect you in anyway…

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

It moved my comment to the bottom of the comments, below the chart I posted, instead of the other way around.

The comment you deleted that said that the CDC number was 67% not 66.8%, like it clearly shows.

Your just playing more games.

Have fun.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I deleted that because you already found the data. No other intention. I cant see how me deleting a comment sends your’s to the bottom. Never happened before. And you should know that 66.8% rounds up to 67%…I posted the 72.1% just to show where he might be getting his 72%. I Originally feed you the the information about the graph you are so gleefully throwing around. You saying you didn’t remember where it came from? It was under 2 weeks ago. And I said where it came from. Now you are acting like you spent hours having to find it. How hard is it to go to CDC.gov and navigate to County View? Quit accusing me of playing games. Windmills..

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Took me around 5 minutes to find that information you deemed so difficult to find and that included the screen shot of the graph

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Again, Bravo!, beetlejuice, Bravo!

Obviously a natural ability of yours!

🤔🧐I feel so diminished!😁

((How is the view from up there?)

Except this time, I don’t see the massive up-votes… Neither one of them.

“5 minutes to find that information that you deemed so difficult to find and that included the screenshot of the graph”, you boast…

Yet, it’s been over 2 1/2 months and counting, and you still haven’t concluded, or acknowledged, that the County of Humboldt is making an error, or what that error is, or the fact that they have been making the same error, since vaccination eligibility for the 5 -11 year olds rolled out?

Why no excessive gloating over that phenomenal delay?

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I already told you those votes can be manipulated. I could add 5 votes on my own. Or did you conveniently forget that?
I liked how you side-stepped that 66.8% rounds up to 67% or did you forget that too?

Last edited 2 years ago
Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

🕯🌳Then why don’t you inform the county of there mistake?🖖🖖

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Good point..Why? It’s easy to contact HCPH…
https://humboldtgov.org/330/Public-Health

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Why don’t you just simply acknowledge that the county is, and has been, making an error?

And was it you that said that we would reach 70% in 2 weeks, and then quickly changed it to 4 weeks, 2 1/2 months ago?

Or was that someone else?

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Let me repeat..I feed you that CDC information so you could prove your point. You never would have found it on your own. At the time it was all “thank you so much, your the man etc etc” Now you accuse me of playing games. Last time I give you information on anything

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

I had already proved it multiple times, and multiple ways. I thought that the information that you provided from the CDC would have changed the minds of those that held fast to the belief that it was I, and not the county, that was wrong, and they would finally admit it, or at least correct the mistake.

But that didn’t happen, even with your additional proof from the CDC.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

🤔🧐

“I have no idea what you’re talking about…”,

And then, additionally, in the next breath…

” I did it because…”

🤪😜😁

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I was talking about you saying that I caused your comment to go to the bottom. Which I proved to be wrong. And why do you keep avoiding that 66.8% can be rounded up to 67%? How do you like those apples? Admit you were wrong move on

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

You did not prove that to be wrong, because that’s precisely what happened.

That may not have happened when you did it again, but that proves absolutely nothing.

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Exactly. I thought it was obvious enough that the comment was self explanatory.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Just proved you wrong again.. Me deleting a comment does not move yours to the bottom

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

I thought you said something to the effect that you didn’t delete your 67%, comment?

You proved nothing again, except the fact that you have been contradicting yourself…

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Still can’t admit that 66.8% rounds up to 67% can u? And that me deleting a commitment moves yours to the bottom. And I never said I didn’t delete the comment. End of story

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Explain why you did not also round 72.1% to 72%…

Both numbers were from the same CDC chart.

You didn’t round both numbers, you only rounded one of them.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Word

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

That sounds like a stretch.

🤔🧐But, I will allow you the last word.😁

For Kym’s sake…

You get one more comment.

Make it a good one…

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Windmills.

I’m not wrong.

You need to admit your wrong about me being wrong.

That is an error of yours.

Just give up.

Last edited 2 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

.

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I suppose this is my fault also.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Very funny, are you going to do it again, beetlejuice?

The county says, mistakenly, “Approximately 72% of the vaccine-eligible population aged 5 and older, were fully vaccinated”.
But the CDC chart clearly says that number is 66.8%.
Who is wrong?

And total population fully vaccinated, which is a different issue, is 63.4%per the CDC, and 63.18%, per the County of Humboldt.

Your 72.1% partially vaxxed nonsense is totally irrelevant.

But I realize you are fully aware of that, and that you are just playing silly games, for whatever reason…

Last edited 2 years ago
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

If they don’t add natural immunity with vaccinated then the stat doesn’t have much meaning anyway

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Windmills…

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Here you go, Beetlejuice, since you iced my comment, and messed up the order again…

Screenshot_20220119-213321.png
Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I figured the chart you showed would have settled it, and that no more work would be necessary.

But, alas, apparently enough proof is not enough proof…

I hope that you see that what I’ve been trying to say is true, now, regardless of the games you play.

I think you do.

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

windmills

beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

OK going to delete my comment above yours to see if it sends your comment to the bottom. Mine refers to the 72.1%. You saying “Very funny, are you going to do it again, beetlejuice?”

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Nope. didn’t send your reply to the bottom. Quit saying I am playing games….windmills,,,,,,,

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

🤔🧐It’s a good thing that you don’t play games…right?🤪😜😁

Thanks for proving it.

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Not good enough. I shouldn’t have had to “prove” anything. How about you admit you were wrong in saying I was playing games?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

You’re tilting.
At windmills.

I was being sarcastic, well, maybe it was facetious.

Either way, as far as whether or not you’ve been playing games, you’ve “shown your hand”.

♠️♣️♥️♦️🃏

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I can do it again and prove your wrong again but it looks like you can’t admit you were wrong so not going to bother.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

If you did it again, (again), you would just prove that I was right, again. So don’t bother unless you can admit you are wrong.

Can you?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

No, you can’t.
That would just dig you deeper.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Did you not notice you told me, “Quit saying I was playing games”,
right after you did it again?

You may not have…

I definitely did.

Last edited 2 years ago
beetlejuice
Member
2 years ago

What happened to La Nina? We are starting to fall behind in our rainfall, with no rain in sight…
Also crude oil hit $87 a barrel. Brent $89!!!

Last edited 2 years ago
Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

🕯🌳Oh Oh.🖖🖖

mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  beetlejuice

Russia is laughing about Brandon’s energy policy all the way to the bank. Meanwhile, American consumers pay the price

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago

🕯🌳If Russia invades Ukraine how will it effect the balance of power in the world?🖖🖖

Last edited 2 years ago
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
Guest
mlr the giant squirrel in Eureka
2 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

Why would it matter? We’re already perceived as weak after the Afghanistan debacle. I expect China to take control of Taiwan under Biden’s watch as well. One thing for sure, we don’t have sufficient strategic interest in Ukraine or Taiwan to get in a shooting war with one of the other superpowers. Things could uncontrollably escalate in a hurry. Boom Boom Out go the lights!

Willie BrayD
Member
2 years ago

🕯🌳It wasn’t Afghanistan that got us looked at as weak it happened in the prior administration. 🖖🖖