1 Death, 2 Hospitalizations, 33 New Cases Reported
Press release from Humboldt County Public Health:
Humboldt County Public Health reported today the death of a resident in their 70s from COVID-19. Staff in the Department Operations Center extend their condolences to the person’s family, friends and caregivers.
The hospitalization of two residents in their 70s was also reported, as well as 33 new cases, bringing to 9,179 the total number of residents who have tested positive for the virus.
On Thursday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accepted its advisory panel’s recommendations to approve Moderna and Johnson & Johnson boosters. The CDC’s new recommendations for the Moderna booster are in line with those for the Pfizer booster and are as follows:
- people aged 65 years and older
- people aged 18 and older who live in long-term care settings
- people aged 18 and older who have certain underlying medical conditions
- people aged 18 and older who work or live in high-risk settings.
People who are eligible may get the Moderna booster six months or more after their initial two-shot vaccination series.
The CDC also endorsed the recommendation for a second Johnson & Johnson dose for adults age 18 or older at least two months after the first shot. In addition, the CDC agreed to the “mixing and matching” of vaccine types, allowing anyone eligible for a booster dose to receive a brand different from the one they received initially.
The CDC endorsement is the final federal hurdle in the approval process. Next, the Western States Scientific Safety Review Workgroup and the California Department of Public Health will make their own recommendations and offer guidance for how the boosters will be rolled out in the state.
As the winter months approach, the CDPH reaffirmed its commitment to universal masking in K-12 school settings to prevent COVID-19 in schools and protect students’ health.
“Now is not the time to let our guard down,” noted Dr. Mark Ghaly,
California Health and Human Services Agency Secretary, and Dr. Tomás Aragón, CDPH Director and State Public Health Officer, in a joint statement yesterday.
“From day one, California has stepped up with policies that keep our children and school staff safe. Universal masking, combined with vaccination measures and access to regular testing, have been key to the state’s nation-leading success in keeping schools open,” the statement read.
Since the last weekly data update on Oct. 15, the county has recorded 164 new cases of COVID-19. Three deaths were reported during that same period, including a fully vaccinated person in their 70s. Of the 10 hospitalizations reported over the last week, three were fully vaccinated and seven were unvaccinated. Age ranges of reported hospitalizations are as follows:
- 1 person under age 10
- 1 person in their 30s
- 1 person in their 40s
- 3 people in their 60s
- 3 people in their 70s
- 1 person age 80 or older
The seven-day average case rate in Humboldt County is currently about 15, meaning that for every 100,000 residents, just under 15 residents tested positive daily over the last seven days. The average case rate varies considerably depending on vaccination status, as illustrated by the graph below, depicting average weekly case rates since Dec. 2020 in unvaccinated and fully vaccinated residents.
The current seven-day average case rate for vaccinated individuals is 8 per 100,000 residents, while the case rate for unvaccinated residents is more than twice as high at 21 per 100,000. Though case rates have fallen from their peaks during the summer surge, rates for the vaccinated group remain higher than any time prior to the summer surge. The case rate for the unvaccinated group has also declined in October, but is still as high as the rate during a winter peak in December. View a more detailed depiction of the case rate graph.
Residents, particularly those who are unvaccinated, are advised to get tested if they are experiencing symptoms or have been in close contact with someone who tested positive for the virus. Testing is available through OptumServe seven days a week at the Wharfinger Building in Eureka and at mobile sites throughout the county most weekdays. For more information about testing, go to humboldtgov.org/covidtestregistration.
On Tuesdays, OptumServe will offer mobile testing on an alternating basis in Trinidad and Garberville. On Oct. 26 it will be held at the Trinidad City Hall testing site located at 409 Trinity St. and runs from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. The site will be closed from 11 a.m. to noon and 2 to 3 p.m. OptumServe’s mobile testing site in Garberville will be held the same hours on Tuesday, Nov. 2, at Jerold Phelps Hospital at 733 Cedar St.
Due to the increasing use of at-home tests for COVID-19, Public Health recommends residents report positive test results so transmission of the virus in the community can be better identified and people can be connected with needed resources.
Those with a positive at-home test for COVID-19 should isolate and notify their close contacts to limit the spread of disease. False positive test results are unlikely when an antigen test is used according to the manufacturer’s instructions, according to the CDC’s antigen testing guidance page. Public Health officials stress that positive at-home test results should be reported to a health care provider or to Public Health if there is no provider.
Individuals who require documentation of test results for employment or travel may get PCR testing through Public Health or their health care providers. PCR follow-up testing for an at-home rapid test is most accurate 24 to 48 hours after an initial at-home positive test. For more information, visit the Humboldt County Home-Testing FAQ, or call the Joint Information Center at 707-441-5000.
The county’s vaccination and testing services are available free of charge. Residents who receive their first or second dose of vaccine at a Public Health office in Eureka, Willow Creek or Garberville can choose a $25 Renner Petroleum or Coming Attractions Theatres gift card. Incentives are offered on a first-come, first-served basis at those locations only.
Appointments for Public Health vaccination clinics are not required but are recommended due to an increase in demand for additional doses and boosters. Sign up in advance at MyTurn.ca.gov. For instructions in English and Spanish on how to use My Turn, go to humboldtgov.org/VaccineInfo.
See the schedule below for specific clinic dates, times, locations and available services:
McKinleyville — Saturday, Oct. 23, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
McKinleyville High School (1300 Murray Road)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing availableRio Dell — Sunday, Oct. 24, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Dollar General (44 W. Davis St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing availableFortuna — Sunday, Oct. 24, 3 to 5 p.m.
Veterans Hall (1426 Main St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing availableEureka — Monday, Oct. 25, 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Closed from noon to 1 p.m.
Public Health Main (529 I St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
No testing available
$25 gift card for those receiving a first or second doseWillow Creek — Tuesday, Oct. 26, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Closed from noon to 1 p.m.
Public Health Office (77 Walnut Way)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing available
$25 gift card for those receiving a first or second doseGarberville — Wednesday, Oct. 27, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Closed from noon to 1 p.m.
Public Health (727 Cedar St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing availablePetrolia — Friday, Oct. 29, 11 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Mattole Resource Center (167 Sherman St.)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing availableHoneydew — Friday, Oct. 29, 3:15 to 5:15 p.m.
Honeydew Elementary School (1 Wilder Ridge Road)
Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson/Moderna
PCR and rapid testing availableCheck availability of a specific vaccine at local pharmacies at vaccines.gov, or text a ZIP code to 438829 to locate a nearby pharmacy offering vaccines.
Pfizer is authorized for those 12 and older, and Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are authorized for people age 18 and older. County residents age 16 and 17 can receive a vaccination at a Public Health clinic without a parent or guardian physically present as long as they have a signed consent form. Children under 16 still must be accompanied by their parent or legal guardian.
View the Data Dashboard online at humboldtgov.org/dashboard, or go to humboldtgov.org/DashboardArchives to download data from a previous time.
For the most recent COVID-19 information, visit cdc.gov or cdph.ca.gov. Local information is available at humboldtgov.org or by contacting [email protected] or calling 707-441-5000.
Sign up for COVID-19 vaccination: MyTurn.ca.gov
Check for vaccine availability at a local pharmacy: Vaccines.gov
Local COVID-19 vaccine information: humboldtgov.org/VaccineInfo
Humboldt County COVID-19 Data Dashboard: humboldtgov.org/Dashboard
Follow us on Facebook: @HumCoCOVID19
Instagram: @HumCoCOVID19
Twitter: @HumCoCOVID19
Humboldt Health Alert: humboldtgov.org/HumboldtHealthAlert
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
CDC says mix and match is cool. Faucci not so much
Fauci says it’s recommended to get same vaccine for COVID-19 boostershttps://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/578096-fauci-says-its-recommended-to-get-same-vaccine-for-covid-19-boosters
Fauci is a liar, so is the cdc
It’s worse than that.
Fauci is a pathological liar.
He might also be a mass murderer.
Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy on a global scale.
Now that he has been exposed,
he needs to be kept far away from any more potential viral pathogens that he might have the access to, and the potential to release.
I certainly wouldn’t put it past him.
He has that potential, and the means.
If his so called integrity is called into question, he could inflict a heavy price to pay in retaliation.
That would be the motive.
He thinks a little too highly of himself.
He essentially holds the nuclear codes right now, and he is a mean little old man 🤔
You should see what he funded to do to beagles in Tunisia. It makes me sick. He is much worse than a mean little old man he is a very sick minded monster.
It on ‘TheHill’. But it’s sickening.
The dogs were drugged, and allowed to be eaten alive by sand fleas, after their vocal chords we’re removed, so their cries and barks wouldn’t bother the “scientists”.
Also left the locked in cages in the desert as bait for sand flies.
That some Mengele type shit right there, folks.
And now he wants to stick needles in little kids?
Fuck that.
Fauci needs to be forced to step down immediately.
And imprisoned.
Depending on what else he is responsible for, the sentence should maybe be capitalized.
100%
👍.
Well, of course he did. He’s following the science, like Mengele did.
The latest weaponizing of difficult issues in the service of an really bad cause.
Thanks
Sorry about that. It really sickened me too.
Why would anyone trust this guy?
Trust the guy because he is one of the highest paid, non elected officials in the nation. Oh and BTW, he is paid with your tax dollars as well. 😑🤑😷😷🤥
. It’s a long read so be prepared. Note: Democracy Now is a left leaning web site, but the article is not political, and should appeal to both ends of the political spectrum
https://www.democracynow.org/2021/10/22/pfizers_power_drug_giant_silenced_governments
I still believe vaccinations and masks are useful tools in fighting Covid-19
Thanks for the clarification; it was uncertain until now.
Have you seen TRB?
Dave’s not here.
What value is the self serving politizing polarization of the left or right? Doing the same evil is not excused by claiming a good intentions.
Who would take the weak J&J unless they were just trying to punch a ticket?
My job made me, so I chose the option with the least hassle. None of the vaccines work in the traditional “now you’re immune” sense, so why not pick the option with the least potential for harm. Since my job pays half a day’s wages for us to get shot, most of my colleagues went with the two-shot vaccines. To a person, they all whine and complain about how bad their side effects are. I had exactly zero side effects from my one and done shot, and I had the ‘vid in 2019.
Quick question: If you don’t own your body, are you free?
So you claim the freedom to do anything you want to others because you own your own body? Quick question: do you still claim the right to your own body if that body is spreading disease?
So why the mix and match research?
It doesn’t make sense.
Over 38% of the hospitalizations in the last week were vaccinated.
That is what is remarkable.
But what they want to emphasize, with their remarks, however, is that “more than twice as many hospitalizations were among the unvaccinated”?
Wouldn’t it be just as accurate to sy that “almost half of the hospitalizations were among the vaccinated”?
I kind of think so.
All the spin is making me sick to my stomach.
What ever happened to, “the vast majority of the hospitalizations are in the unvaccinated”?
It seems like we are creeping up on hospitalizations being 50/50.
How will they spin that?
The higher the levels of vaccination in the population, the more likely it is that the percentage of those vaccinated who are ill will rise.
A new study suggests that almost half of those hospitalized with COVID-19 have mild or asymptomatic cases.
Seems like most hospitalizations are due to people panicking
https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/620062/
The premise of that article is that a person who is infected but in the hospital for other reasons should not be counted as a covid hospitalization. For some things, like for deciding the danger of infection for political decisions, that is a consideration. However for the hospital, there are many other considerations. Such patients need isolation protocols even if the reason they are is so unrelated as an injury for example. Every bit of dealing with them is complicated and more difficult by the hospital’s duty to keep infection from staff and other patients. They can’t even be wheeled down the hall for scan without an elaborate preventive plan. Covid, symptomatic or not, is a PITA for hospitals.
Besides, frankly the premise that people with mild symptoms were admitted solely because of covid is not likely. If a person needs no care, covid or not, they are not going to be admitted. Incidental infection yes. Overly cautious admittance, no. Covid can not be dismissed with that idea.
But the bit in the article – ““It’s underreported how well the vaccine makes your life better, how much less sick you are likely to be, and less sick even if hospitalized,” Snyder said. “That’s the gem in this study.”” was nice.
Kym,
Rise a little, yes, but not so much.
Depends on the efficacy.
That really only stands to reason in a significant way, as the vaccinated efficacy starts to really decrease.
You are making it sound like you have less confidence in the vaccines efficacy against hospitalization than I do.
We are not talking about efficacy against just infection or illness.
What do you think it is against hospitalization?
Assuming the efficacy against hospitalization, is 90%,
(it’s clearly not), if we were at 50% vaccinated population, it seems to me like the hospitalization ratio should be
10 unvaxxed to 1 vaxxed.(1/10th)
So far so good?
60% vaccinated population would only add 20% to the vaccinated hospitalizations, but subtract 20% from the unvaxxed, changing the ratio only slightly to 8 unvaxxed to 1.2 vaxxed. Convert that to
10 UV, versus1.5V. (+ 25% each).
Yet, we are at 10 unvaxxed to 3.8 vaxxed. (38%)
At 60% vaccinated population, that would suggest about 75% efficacy against hospitalization, overall for all vax types, wouldn’t it.
My methodology might not be perfect, but 38% hospitalizations isn’t looking too good.
I could be wrong…
It wouldn’t be the first time…
But cases are still up even though people are getting vaccinated. Just another worthless drug, but it seems to make people feel better and it’s hard to beat a positive attitude. Too bad it always comes back to drugs for people to be positive .
Ranger knows common sense. What a show this all is. 95 percent of deaths have 4 comorbidities. So many were basically being kept alive by pharmaceutical beverages. Loved as they are Us deaths did not increase that much over past years we had alot of people that were being kept alive that were increasing in numbers.
You got that right!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FB1E5yrWEAY_Jqo?format=jpg&name=900×900
Are you quoting a national statistic when you say over 38% of the hospitalizations were vaccinated? This article clearly states that in Humboldt county 7 of 10 hospitalizations this week were unvaccinated. 3 of 10 were vaccinated. 30% versus 70%.
Skitty,
Last 30 days, 8 versus 21 per 100,000, per the graph, and the article. (38% and change)
30% vs 70% would be assuming equal proportions of vaxxed to unvaxxed.
However, that is not the case.
Correct Guest, thanks. For the past 7 days, the average was 8 vaxxed cases per 100,000 locally, and in that same period there were 21 unvaxxed cases per 100,000 locally. (According to this graph and the North Coast Journal).
That is a 38% change from the previous week; however there has not been a 38% increase in those being vaxxed locally during that period.
In that period there were 686 that completed their vaxx series.
(According to the North Coast Journal).
686 more having completed their vaxx series in a county of about 130 thousand would show and increase int the total vaxxed by about a percent.
686 having completed their vaxx series, during that time would not account for the cases in the vaxxed increasing by 38%.
You have to look at the world not just Humboldt county ,sound familiar? Crack me up.
How about that 25 buck renner card, what is that ? 5 biden gallons. Compared to 8.5 rump gallons, thanks Joe , you da man, let’s go brandon
The key driver for this recent rise in the price of gas is crude oil, which typically accounts for between 50% and 60% of the price at the pump,” said AAA Spokesperson Andrew Gross. “And last week’s decision by OPEC and its oil-producing allies to not increase production further only exacerbated the upward momentum for crude oil prices.” Wall Street futures traders are also a factor. Its called Capitalism=Greed. Also the U.S. is still exporting oil.
United States exports more refined petroleum products than it does crude oil. Petroleum product exports averaged 5.5 million b/d in the first half of 2021, up from 5.3 million b/d in the first half of last year.Sep 17, 2021
Petroleum products include motor gasoline.
“OPEC and its oil-producing allies to not increase production”
And why do we need OPEC oil?
Let’s go Brandon!
“Wall Street futures traders are also a factor. Its called Capitalism=Greed.”
Riiiiight. I guess the “speculators” took the last 8 years off? Derrrp, capitalism!
Maybe we should nationalize our oil and call it Democratic Socialism. Worked out well for Venezuala huh Brian?
Key driver is in the driver’s seat, if you don’t wish to acknowledge the president has alot of influence on fuel prices, keep them blinders on.
When asked if President Joe Biden is responsible for the higher gas prices across the country Jeanette McGee, AAA’s director of external communications, told VERIFY that the American Automobile Association is often asked how presidents and their decisions in office can impact gas prices.
“The bottom line is gas prices fluctuate no matter who’s in the White House,” said McGee. “If you look at the past 16 years, prices were up and down no matter who was there.”
A graph from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) shows that retail gas prices have fluctuated from 1994 to 2020, no matter who was in office.
The Ranger isn’t interested in the truth, it’s more fun to poke at Libs, especially Boomer Libs. And the crack up…
One more time – The price of gasoline consists of four factors: taxes, distribution and marketing, the cost of refining, and crude oil prices — which are not determined by the President.
But I fully expect you to keep repeating what isn’t true time and time again. Crack me up.
🕯🌳He’s a broken record on that subject. 🖖🖖
“The price of gasoline consists of four factors:”
So the halting the Keystone pipeline doesn’t affect distribution and limiting fracking doesn’t affect supply?
You might wanna add supply as the 6th factor of your 4 factors.
It’s also worth noting how ineffective the “vaccine” is if people of any substantial amount are being hospitalized after taking the covid juice.
Just not anywhere near as ineffective as being unvaccinated. But that’s not news.
Have you looked into how many people have died from comorbidities that are chalked up to covid deaths? Numerous reports of deaths being inaccurately counted?
Yes, people are dying from covid but it’s people’s choice to get a shot that’s apparently not very effective since the “vaxxed” are supposedly incredibly safe from covid yet still paralyzed with fear of getting covid. Now there’s talk that you’ll have to have boosters (I doubt it will stop at one booster) to be considered fully vaccinated. Covid isn’t going anywhere so when does the fear mongering over this end?
Thanks C J, you are correct, the fatality or some of the newly hospitalized could have been one of the 1,057 newly vaxxed, but as they will not release the data of the partially vaxxed, the public has no way of knowing.
38% isnt anywhere near 50%?
It’s getting a lot closer.
Yes Guest, it is getting closer to 50%.
30% in the most recent count.
Ignore the 30% statement, it is supposed to say 38%.
Meant to edit it but it disappears for a bit if you leave the article and try and come back right away, easier to repost with the correction, if I get impatient, then come back and explain.
That’s a good point CJ.
1,057 vaxx doses were given the past week,
(with 686 having newly completed their vaxx series, locally. According to the North Coast Journal).
Of the 1,057 vaxxes given last week, they don’t make public
whether or not any in that group were part of the cases, or hospitalizations or fatalities.
They could tell us, but they don’t.
They have the data about the partially vaxxed, but they won’t release it to the public.
So the dashboard today shows 493 tests with 33 confirmed. That’s 6.6937119675456389452% of the total.
Sounds like antigen tests are coming back way more positive than pcr testing.
Makes sense in that maybe antigen tests are more commonly used by the symptomatic that are staying home?
And maybe that many of the pcr tests are just periodic testing results.
And there’s that dramatic, scary Font again….
Anyone catch the CDC saying that they may have to change the definition of fully vaccinated? How many times are people going to have to get a booster shot to be considered fully vaccinated before they realize the bs they are being fed? Businesses being forced to be the covid police in the Bay area, government fining businesses for not discriminating against their customers.
I’d make a compromise with the pro big pharma vax lovers out there, I’d happily get my vax and show my “I’m a sheep” papers if the federal government would apply similar standards to employers having to verify that only legal citizens could be hired in the US (e-verify) or face the same steep fines that businesses who refuse to play covid police are being forced to pay.
Yeah, I caught that.
It didn’t really make sense that getting a third dose, (or booster), was in order to go from being fully vaccinated, to being fully vaccinated.
Or would that be fully, fully vaccinated?
Like for sure, for sure.
I wonder about the mix and match thing, too.
I finally figured out that they had to do that because there is no way that anyone that got the J&J jab in the first place, with half a noodle, isn’t going to make that same mistake again.
Why is Fauci suggesting that they should do that? Maybe because if he doesn’t, it looks bad, and if he does, it looks bad?
And like anyone that got two doses of the Moderna, and then found out it provided the most protection, is going to opt for a J&J jab, for a booster. Or a Pfizer.
I actually did see an individual opt for a first dose of J&J recently, 9/15.
I couldn’t figure out why. I really don’t think it should still be an option. Not if it’s recommended to get the same type as a follow-up, and people end up prefering not to.
It’s getting pretty chaotic.
Let me get this straight, if you got one dose of J&J first, then you can follow it up with one dose of mRNA…
or would it be two…?
And if you got your two initial doses of say, Moderna, you can opt for a third dose, ( or booster), of the J&J…
Or of you really want to think outside of the box, or are really bad at making decisions, you could go for one of each.
That might make the most sense if you already have only the one J&J in your system. (Not to be confused with making the most sense).
And so is it ok to get, say a Moderna, then a J&J, and then, a Pfizer?
Sure!, why not? Makes perfect sense.
Walensky says, it’s fine to just choose whatever is available…
Fauci, Walensky, Coren, Hoffman…,
why does it sound like they are all high on crack?
So many inconsistencies, so little time.
Fauci;
“SARSCOV2 is of natural origin, not from a lab, and we didn’t pay to engineer it.”
“The vaccines are safe for kids”
Walensky:
“It was my call”.
“Fully vaccinated no longer means fully vaccinated”
“Do whatever”.
Hoffman:
~’What sounds better’~
~’Should I say, “almost twice as many unvaccinated hospitalizations”, or should I say “almost half of hospitalizations are vaccinated”?’~
Six of one, half a dozen of the other, figuratively speaking.
Coren:
“The average age of the vaccinated COVID19 deaths is 95, ER um, 68, ER um, about 88.”
(It was 83).
Exactly Guest. And of the 1,057 locally just vaxxed last week, they will not be considered fully vaxxed until 1-5 weeks from now, and by that time fully vaxxed might means 3 shots.
The White House on Wednesday unveiled its plan to give 28 million U.S. children vaccinations against Covid-19. Let’s. look at the key details of Biden’s child vaccination plan
Start with the popular kids and assume the rest will fall in line.
Vaccine molecules designed in fun animal shapes.
Federal pizza party for fourth-grade class with highest vaccination rate.
Requiring vaccinations for children who work full-time at companies with more than 100 employees.
Educational collaborations with distinguished epidemiologists kids trust.
Every mall Santa will be disguised vaccine-wielding nurse.
$20 million program to counteract playground misinformation.
Explain to kids it’s no different than any other painful shot a doctor gives them.
Recruit dozens of TikTok stars to cyberbully kids into getting vaccinated. -the Onion
😅
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld compulsory vaccination in two decisions. The first, in 1905, affirmed that mandates are constitutional. The second, in 1922, specifically upheld school-based requirements.
My mother in law is in a high risk age group, high risk multiple health risk and is vaccinated. She is a recipient of Visiting Angels care through a number of caregivers. Recently, she received care from an unvaxinated, ill caregiver. We found out a couple weeks later the caregiver was sick with COVI. We found out, not from Visiting Angels, but through another individual. I called Visiting Angels and left a message asking why we weren’t notified of a possible COVID exposure in our home. They never returned my call. Evidently “Caregiving” in the case of Visiting Angels actually means, “We really don’t give a shit.”
Does anyone know of a caregiving company in the area that actually does give a shit? In the past, we had Agape and the manager not only forgot to send caregivers and forget to transport to and from appointments regularly, when I called and spoke with him, he refused to take responsibility for his failures. He instead had every excuse in the book for why it wasn’t his fault. That’s why we changed to Visiting Angels.
Is a woman who is almost 90 going to have to continue to have this kind of “Care” or is there actually quality somewhere in Humboldt? At least she is vaccinated which has helped so far.
I had a bad experience with them too
From what I have seen, in this country there is not quality elder care unless you are quite wealthy (and even then it’s not guaranteed) or a family member is willing to care for for loved one directly
Kym you recently stated about VAERS:
“AND that its reports are looked at closely by scientists for any issues. And any they find are being brought to light.”
You also stated:
“The death of the 15-year-old that we talked about MAY have been from the vaccine. BUT so far it has not been proven.”
I’m curious. How “closely” are scientists looking at this issue? And since they’re looking so closely, do they now know what killed this kid and thousands of other unexplained deaths that meet the criteria for causality (Bradford Hill)? Do you know (or give a shit) what the Bradford Hill criteria is? Does a THOUSAND fold increase in adverse events and a FIVE THOUSAND fold increase in deaths “give you pause” or is that all chalked up to “not a controlled environment”?
Are you sticking to your statement that: “adverse effects found are not even close to the protection offered by the vaccine” ? You positive about that?
Does that include children and pregnant women?
Chill Bro. No reason to make it personal. We’re all friends here.
friends don’t let friends vaxx up their 4 year old with experimental MRNA technology,
Succinctly put. And spot on.
Not sure how I made it personal. But I am sick and tired of people incessantly peddling this shit that have ZERO answers to a VAERS system that is SCREAMING in their faces while the data piles up around them like horse shit showing that aside from being dangerous, these fucking vaccines don’t prevent Covid (and likely promote it’s evolution)!
We are about to give this shit to innocent children, whose risk from covid is almost NIL. This is fucking insanity. So no, I will not chill without some clear explanations.
Good point about vaers rollin. Vaers definitely shows some correlation to the vaxxes. It’s not possible, and it’s laughable that there’s all this data about fatalities, adverse effects in vaers that has nothing to do with fatalities, adverse events related to the vaxxes.
Vaers literally stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, it does not stand for not vaxx adverse event reporting system.
Agree.
Thanks rollin, agree 100%. VAERS literally stands for the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System,
so if the data in it isn’t about the vaxxes, then what is it about?
👍.
“Nordic countries are restricting the use of Moderna’s Covid vaccine. Here’s why
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/08/nordic-countries-are-restricting-the-use-of-modernas-covid-vaccine.html
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-lists-rare-nerve-disorder-possible-side-effect-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-2021-09-08/.
note: this applies to the J&J and they use the words extremely rare,”at least a reasonable possibility”
I heard the vaxxed are all placebo
VAERS stands for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
So it is not VAEPS for Vaccines Adverse Event Proven System? Think of it as grammar- it is a reporting system for adverse events after vaccination. Nothing more. It does presume a modicum of reason in making a report. But clearly encourages over reporting in preference to under reporting. It should not be abused by anti vaxxers in the way it is.
And in no way have they been ruled out.
Maybe not proven, but certainly not disproven.
It sure is a significant amount of real world correllative circumstantial evidence to just be ignoring so carelessly.
A little prudence is in order.
Fauci will be shown to be a criminal when this is all said and done.
Say the unhappy villagers with their torches and pitchforks getting people they hated for other reasons.
👁👁