CDFA Says, Governor Newsom’s California Comeback Plan Proposes Millions in Funding for Cannabis

California cannabis featurePress release from CalCannabis:

Governor Newsom’s California Comeback Plan released today proposes $100 million General Fund in grant funding for local governments to complete environmental studies, license reviews, and mitigate environmental impacts. The proposal supports a broader effort to transition cannabis businesses into the regulated market and to reduce barriers to entry for small businesses. The California Comeback Plan also proposes a Deputy Director of Equity and Inclusion to lead state efforts to address the impacts of the War on Drugs and allocates nearly $630 million in cannabis tax funds to public health, environmental protection, and public safety initiatives.
Overview of Cannabis Proposals in the California Comeback Plan

Local Assistance Grant Program and Transition of Provisional Licenses
Approximately 82 percent of California’s cannabis licensees are provisionally licensed. The Local Jurisdiction Assistance Grant Program targets jurisdictions that have high numbers of provisional licensees across the supply chain, many of which were early adopters and are transitioning larger populations of legacy and equity operators into the regulated market. Funds are intended to aid locals in more expeditiously reviewing provisional licensee local requirements, notably those related to the California Environmental Quality Act, and can be passed through to licensees for things such as mitigation measures, including those related to water conservation. Once these requirements are met, the state can more rapidly transition provisional licensees to annual state licenses.

“This grant funding aims to serve local governments and a significant portion of the provisional license population, including a number of small businesses and equity operators,” said Nicole Elliott, Governor Newsom’s Senior Advisor on Cannabis. “We are committed to maintaining stability across the cannabis supply chain, supporting our local partners, and transitioning provisional licenses into annual licensure more swiftly, without sacrificing California’s environmental commitments.”

The funding that will be available to local jurisdictions is calculated based on provisional licenses issued by the state, and is proposed to be allocated as follows:

  • Category 1 – 25 percent: top 8 jurisdictions allowing cannabis cultivation.
  • Category 2 – 25 percent: top 8 jurisdictions allowing manufacturing and the top 8 jurisdictions allowing all other cannabis activities, except events.
  • Category 3 – 50 percent: additional funding for jurisdictions that qualify for Category 1 or 2 and are also implementing local equity programs.

Under current statute, the provisional license program will sunset on January 1, 2022. The Governor’s Plan proposes allowing provisional licenses to be issued until June 30, 2022, makes explicit environmental compliance requirements necessary to attain and maintain a provisional license, mandates the Department to specify through regulation what progress is required to maintain a provisional license, and removes the sunset date, thereby allowing a provisional license to be maintained so long as the applicant is making measurable progress toward achieving annual licensure.

Deputy Director of Equity and Inclusion
The California Comeback Plan proposes an additional position within the Department of Cannabis Control – a Deputy Director of Equity and Inclusion – to serve as the lead on all matters of the Department pertaining to the implementation of the California Cannabis Equity Act. This individual would be the Department liaison for local equity programs created to support and reduce barriers to entry for those negatively impacted by the War on Drugs and would also work directly with the Department Director to further incorporate equity and inclusivity into policies and operational activities throughout the Department.

Sustainable California Grown Cannabis Pilot Program
The California Comeback Plan proposes $9 million in funding for a Sustainable California Grown Cannabis pilot program which will provide funding to incentivize licensed outdoor cannabis growers to participate in the collection of data to benchmark best practices that reduce the environmental impact of cannabis water and energy use; pest management and fertilizer practices; and, to enhance soil health. The purpose of the pilot program is to establish science-based data for the future inclusion of cannabis in current and future state and national voluntary programs to advance environmental stewardship and to develop and advance Best Management Practices for Sustainable Cannabis Growing.

Updated Tax Allocations
The California Comeback Plan estimates $629.1 million in cannabis tax funding will be available for public health, environmental protection, and public safety initiatives, a 41.9 percent increase from the Governor’s Budget estimates in January. The funding will be allocated as follows:

  • Education, prevention, and treatment of youth substance use disorders and school retention — 60 percent ($377.5 million).
  • Clean-up, remediation, and enforcement of environmental impacts created by illegal cannabis cultivation — 20 percent ($125.8 million).
  • Public safety-related activities — 20 percent ($125.8 million).

The Department of Cannabis Control will be formed on July 1, 2021, pending approval by the Legislature, and will combine the cannabis licensing and regulatory functions currently performed by the Department of Consumer Affairs’ Bureau of Cannabis Control, the California Department of Food and Agriculture’s CalCannabis Cultivation Licensing Division, and the California Department of Public Health’s Manufactured Cannabis Safety Branch.

For more information on the California Comeback Plan and cannabis proposals, visit the Department of Finance’s eBudget website.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Xebeche
Guest
Xebeche
2 years ago

If the state pays to mitigate enviornmental impacts does the county still get to fine people umpty thousand dollars per minute?

VMG
Guest
VMG
2 years ago
Reply to  Xebeche

This plan may well be one of the stupidest wastes of money in the history of money or government…

Cannabis will shake out, and the strong will survive…

California wants it’s whack, and, if you don’t pay, you won’t get to play…

Bootleggers will always exist, but it won’t be long until the economics wipe out the small players…

People don’t want “the best”, they want the strongest for the least…

You may well be a genius at growing, but the money will be in the marketing, the financing, the application of product to mass marketing…

Growers are totally on the wrong end of this deal.

thetallone
Guest
thetallone
2 years ago

So, $125 million for “Clean-up, remediation, and enforcement of environmental impacts created by illegal cannabis”. CAMP 2.0?
And they want to add more regulations to growers, but only outdoor growers, in the name of the environment, when indoor grows have a far larger environmental footprint.
Fries with your McWeed, sir?

JB
Guest
JB
2 years ago
Reply to  thetallone

// “And they want to add more regulations to growers, but only outdoor growers…”//

Not sure what jurisdiction is doing what you claim, but at the state level, regulations for indoor are steep and getting steeper. The CEC (California Energy Commission) is adopting new energy rules for all controlled environment cultivation. These regulations are going to induce huge capital upgrade costs for existing indoor growers and add large costs to new facilities.

(I’m for the new CEC regulations btw and they impact me bigly)

Hayforker
Guest
Hayforker
2 years ago
Reply to  JB

Trinity is looking to add more environmental regs to outdoor. Mainly in reference to odor but also water use and road impacts. This is mainly driven by the anti cannabis old timers. Even after explaining the numerous waterboard regs and LSAA requirements, they still dont care. Hummm, maybe it’s not about saving the environment from outdoor cannabis, but more about continuing to hate while destroying any chance at an economic recovery for the county.

Note to trinity reefer madness holdovers: the world doesn’t stop changing just cuz you have stopped. Please stop blocking progress.

Sincerely, the future

Villian
Guest
Villian
2 years ago
Reply to  Hayforker

,
Trinity County is all about suppressing wages so SPI won’t have to raise their’s. Cannabis represents the greatest threat to the good old boy’s established order since the end of the last prohibition. While the businesses fighting to eliminate cannabis by any means possible are whining about a lack of “people willing to work”, what they’re facing is a simple price war. Cannabis simply pays better. Cannabis gives the “little guy” a chance for financial independence, and cannabis can be profitable on a relatively small scale; both threats to corporate Amerikkka and the old timers who still think $5 per hour is a living wage.
Here’s a clue; look at a business’s employee parking lot. What do you see? Around here it’s one or two top of the line trucks and the rest are, are, well let’s just say less than pristine.
Of course Trinity law enforcement is all about serving those same “established interest” so while cannabis enforcement is a priority, the very real problems of meth, heroin and fentanyl rage below the radar while the TCSD parades it’s cannabis enforcement across the news as some kind of accomplishment.
If Trinity County wants to emerge from its’ chronic poverty its’ going to have to embrace a different kind of chronic.

Hayforker
Guest
Hayforker
2 years ago
Reply to  Villian

Villain, you’re absolutely correct. The lone weaverville mill actually sent a manager (a lady who identified herself, but I can’t recall her name and there’s no video from back then easily available) to a BOS meeting. Some local farmers wanted to over throw the ad hoc planning program and this lady shows up to a packed meeting knowing the threat to the good old boy club. The manager actually said the legal farms will pay better and thereby reduce the pool of applicants for the mill. She said they already have a hard time filling jobs. Haha what she didn’t mention is that passing a piss test is their biggest problem with applicants and I’ve rarely seen a farm worker who didn’t atleast smoke herb.

Make no doubt, the mill and the other establishment businesses are threatened by the easy work and better pay at farms. You’d see people leave all types of jobs each fall to go trim.

thetallone
Guest
thetallone
2 years ago
Reply to  JB

Good that they are tightening regs for indoor. Since it is possible to grow weed in the sun (or so I’ve heard), and that method has the potential for the smallest environmental impact, that should be the standard to aim for. If indoor can offset it’s high energy use with renewables, and contribute zero waste into local drainages, great.
The part in the above press release called “Sustainable California Grown Cannabis Pilot Program” is talking about gathering data from outdoor farms which, I’m surmising, will be used in the future to add more regulations for outdoor farmers. Some theorize that the structures of Cannabis regulation are designed for the benefit of the Big-Ag style mega-Canna-farms. Crazy theory, I know.

All new lights are the same
Guest
All new lights are the same
2 years ago
Reply to  JB

Not true. It’s all about effincncy of equipment which all the standard double end fixtures everyone is using still fall under. Same with ac equipment. Most of the new led lights indoor cultivators looking into run a 1000w or more so this idea/rumor that we will all have to replace all of our equipment is false. You should read the actual regulation. I am a license holder for indoor cultivation in humboldt so I know this regulation well and its big to do about nothing. Doesn’t help reduce energy footprints at all.

JB
Guest
JB
2 years ago

// ” Not true … this idea/rumor that we will all have to replace all of our equipment is false.”//

Of course it’s false — did someone say everyone will have to replace all the equipment?

Not exactly sure what I said that you find ‘not true”, but not only do I hold full state annual license approval, but I am also an engineer with a specialty in CEC facility design. As such I am intimately familiar with the current and proposed CEC regs.

Perhaps your facility will require no upgrades to meet the new proposed CEC regulations – excellent. That is not universally true. The regulations are are indeed being tightened and will increase grower capital costs in the long run (and I’m still for them).

JB
Guest
JB
2 years ago

Well, Being one of the top jurisdictions, Santa Barbara County definitely is going to get a healthy chunk to help get more 40 acre grows through the CEQA process.

Yeah,sure
Guest
Yeah,sure
2 years ago
Reply to  JB

I don’t know, is it going to be like the greenrush? So much weed being produced that prices will plummet? Who’s goino to ultimately be ingesting all the weed being produced in say, 5 years?

JB
Guest
JB
2 years ago
Reply to  Yeah,sure

I have no crystal ball, but I don’t think we need one to make certain predictions.

I wouldn’t want to be in the biomass business in the next few years. For the most part, that’s what these massive grows in SB are producing. I don’t see how it can end up in anything but a distillate crash.

I think if one grows stellar weed (which simply isn’t in the cards anytime soon in these giant grows) one can steer clear of the crash (crossing fingers).

thetallone
Guest
thetallone
2 years ago
Reply to  JB

The problem isn’t whether these mega grows can grow “stellar” weed. The problem is that they will, without too much trouble, grow mountains of weed that is 80 or 90% as good as Triangle Primo, and that will satisfy the large majority of smokers. Not to mention, smoking flower is just one (shrinking) method of ingestion, causing yet more competition for that market.

cmon
Guest
cmon
2 years ago
Reply to  Yeah,sure

this plant competes with every industry you can think of. its not just about getting high anymore. wake up and support your community

Legallettuce
Guest
Legallettuce
2 years ago

lol, anything to help these corporate fucks. Well still ain’t gonna help ya grow better weed than me.

“The California Comeback Plan also proposes a Deputy Director of Equity and Inclusion to lead state efforts to address the impacts of the War on Drugs.”

Impacts huh, gonna address incarcerating my dad cause of your fuck’in lies, to late he’s dead. How about kids like me grow’in up without their dad we are adults now and from my point of view ya’ll can go fuck yourselves.

Legacy
Guest
Legacy
2 years ago
Reply to  Legallettuce

I couldn’t agree with you more.
If the “new rules” said ALL cannabis had to be 100% organically grown and ALL indoor had to be 100% solar powered….I might listen. 💥

JB
Guest
JB
2 years ago
Reply to  Legallettuce

I feel your pain LL. What this senseless war on drugs has done to families is the real crime. As usual, the children are the true victims.

I’m sorry you had to go through that and my heart is with you thinking about your Dad.

Legallettuce
Guest
Legallettuce
2 years ago
Reply to  JB

Blessings.

Be vocal brother and humble anyone who should be reminded what you lost because of their lies. I wish nothing but success for you. For me, my bitterness is deep, I am to old to change or accept legalization and every harvest is my way at getting back at them all.

cmon
Guest
cmon
2 years ago

“new rules” for cannabis demand more than the food you eat. we’re trying. war on drugs…devastating. and is why indoor exists at all. 100 percent solar powered dildo think about it

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
2 years ago

The waste of taxpayer money to buy votes continues ad infinitum

Lets get some
Guest
Lets get some
2 years ago

Isnt there a happy, joyful recall in the horizon for this guy !!!!
Happy recall !!!!!! 😀😀😀😀😀

Early Cuyler
Guest
Early Cuyler
2 years ago

Of course it includes millions of dollars for cannabis, Gavin Newsom owns shit tons of Flo Kana!

loldemocrats
Guest
loldemocrats
2 years ago

If you read the fine print all that money goes to local governments to regulate more. None of it will go to farmers, it will all go to create a larger state entity that controls more of cannabis regulation.

The same stuff the state told us for 45 years was illegal and we would go to jail for it, now they are the only ones who can tell us its ok. Because they are experts.

If this money isn’t going back to farmers its 100% bullshit. Your fees go up, government control goes up.

Mariahgirl
Guest
2 years ago

California does not need to do more studies or form more government agencies with upteen more employees that we have to pay for.

Dr. Pepper
Guest
Dr. Pepper
2 years ago

Because what do we need more than anything? TWO dispensaries in a town of 175 people! 🤓👍

bottomline
Guest
bottomline
2 years ago

look up the article in the L.A times about Gavin Newsome fundtaising in Salinas Ca. hr raised more $ off legal cannabis farmers than all farming in California combined and Kamala Harris was involved too with their huge cannabis consulting firm. Now its time to pay the piper with tax money. june 27, 2017..