1 Death, 26 New Cases Reported Today; 3 Pfizer Vaccination Clinics Coming Up

novel coronavirus Covid-19 HumboldtPress release from the Humboldt County Joint Information Center:

A Humboldt County resident has died with COVID-19, and 26 new cases of the virus were reported today. A total of 4,072 county residents have tested positive.

The community member who died was in their 50s, marking the third death this week and the county’s 42nd COVID-related death. Public Health and emergency response staff extend their sympathies to the person’s friends, loved ones and caregivers.

Three Pfizer first-dose vaccination clinics are scheduled over the next three weeks. All county residents age 12 and older can sign up to receive this vaccine at MyTurn.ca.gov. Appointments are encouraged but not required.

These Pfizer clinics are held at College of the Redwoods located at 7351 Tompkins Hill Road in Eureka. See the schedule of first-dose clinics below.

  • Thursday, May 20 – 2 to 6 p.m.
  • Thursday, May 27 – 2 to 6 p.m.
  • Wednesday, June 2 – 2 to 6 p.m.

In addition to stating a child’s age when signing up on My Turn, parents or guardians of minors must provide written consent in person at the vaccination clinic. A consent form will be provided.

Anyone with questions about signing up through My Turn can call the state’s COVID-19 hotline at 1-833-422-4255.
View the Humboldt County Data Dashboard online at humboldtgov.org/dashboard, or go to humboldtgov.org/DashboardArchives to download today’s data.

For the most recent COVID-19 information, visit cdc.gov or cdph.ca.gov. Local information is available at humboldtgov.org or by contacting [email protected] or calling 707-441-5000.
Sign up for COVID-19 vaccination: MyTurn.ca.gov
Check for vaccine availability at a local pharmacy: Vaccines.gov
Local COVID-19 vaccine information: humboldtgov.org/VaccineInfo
Humboldt County COVID-19 Data Dashboard: humboldtgov.org/Dashboard
Follow us on Facebook: @HumCoCOVID19
Instagram: @HumCoCOVID19
Twitter: @HumCoCOVID19
Humboldt Health Alert: humboldtgov.org/HumboldtHealthAlert

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Me
Guest
Me
2 years ago

I’d like to know how many of the recent deaths and infections were from people who are vaccinated . These reports don’t say either way.

4Trinity
Guest
4Trinity
2 years ago
Reply to  Me

Very good point Me.

Also wondering why, with few “precautions” being taken by locals, Trinity’s numbers remain the same?

Coincidentally, not a whole lot of “testing” or jabbin’ going on around here. 🤔

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  4Trinity

Hey!, 4Trinity,

Wait just a minute!, 🤔,

You are using my material! 😁

4Trinity
Guest
4Trinity
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

So many inconsistancies, so little time. 🤙

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
2 years ago
Reply to  Me

As long as hipaa is around, we have no answers. Hipaa is another joke.

Jacob
Guest
Jacob
2 years ago
Reply to  Me

On May 1st the CDC stopped tracking “breakthrough” cases in vaccinated individuals, unless they were hospitalized or dead. No doubt Health Canada has done the same. This does two things: 1) ensure that the number of unvaccinated individuals testing positive is overestimated and 2) turns vaccinated individuals with COVID into carriers like Typhoid Mary.

This as after 10,300 or so hospitalizations (160 deaths) were reported between Jan and April 2021 in vaccinated individuals. Guess the numbers don’t help the narative.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago

So would I, Me,

The implication is that all the new infections and deaths are from the unvaccinated group.

But, that is not necessarily true.

Netanyahu made a real big deal out of how high the high percentage of people that were dying were unvaccinated in Israel of Covid19, over a thirty day period(97+%), even though at the beginning of that time frame, virtually no one was fully vaccinated (5 total),so basically 100% we’re unvaccinated, and the peak of deaths in their highest surge was at two weeks. At that point only one in ten had been fully vaccinated.
By the end of the 30 days,75% of Israelis were vaccinated, but those that died in that 30 days did not just drop dead upon infection.

If it took them two or three weeks to succumb after infection, of course well over 90% of them were unvaccinated, and very few that died that were vaccinated. At the time they were infected, that was the ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated. Duh!

Netanyahu Logic.

It’s all that was possible. Literally.

That’s not jarring, like he said it was, it’s elementary.

Like, no shit, really?

What else could possibly have happened?

Let me give you a similar example or two, non believers, as if it will help you, of “Netanyahu Logic”…

“Before anyone was vaccinated, 0%,(not even one), of fully vaccinated people died!, and fully 100% that died of Covid19,(every single one), was unvaccinated!”

“Jarring!!!”

Let me put a jarring “twist” on it,

“When and if everyone is fully vaccinated, only people who are vaccinated will die of Covid19, or of anything else for that matter,(100%) And not one unvaccinated person will die of Covid19,(0%), and those are facts.

That’s “Netanyahu Logic” with a twist.

What was surprising, call it a jarring fact even, is how some people actually quoted his stupid statement as evidence, parroting it as some sort of of corroboration of the actual efficacy of the vaccine.

Totally different. Not even close.

When we hear about ‘breakthrough cases’ we hear about an involvement of around a1/10th percentile, when at 90% efficacy, like they say, the involved number would be 100 times higher.

If the efficacy was truly 98.9%, like their breakthrough numbers indicate,
(Only 9,500 out of 9,000,000), they would surely be asserting that efficacy.

They are not, because it isn’t true.

At 90% efficacy, one would expect to have 900,000 breakthrough infections,
not 9,500.

It’s not to be believed.

It’s 99% bullshit. Let’s call it 100%.

And you probably don’t believe me,
You probably believe them.

And Netanyahu.

You can’t be helped.

Auntie Ovine
Guest
Auntie Ovine
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

That is reading way too much into what has been the typical format for these announcements. As for “surely they would be asserting” making it clear that people are dying from covid after vaccination, anyone posting on this site knows that making specific claims rather than vague but ominous assertions leads to embarassment when the fail to materialize. Nope, it’s better to take potshots at people based on opinion and allege things that are impossible to disprove.

The efficacy of vaccination would not be based on anecdotes for scientist but on accumulating as much data as possible then analyzing it for patterns.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Ovine

You can’t be helped.

Auntie Ovine
Guest
Auntie Ovine
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Nor herded, railroaded stampeded or bullied. Nor gaslighted, hoodwinked, manipulated or conned…

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Ovine

Nor considered.
Nor believed.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Ovine

The CDC said,

“It is important to note that reported vaccine breakthrough cases WILL REPRESENT AN UNDERCOUNT.”(emphasis mine).

“This surveillance system is passive and relies on voluntary reporting from State health departments which may not (may not?, that would be a definite won’t) be complete” (parenthetical info mine)

“Also, not all real world breakthrough cases will be identified because of lack of testing.
This is particularly true in instances of asymptomatic or mild illness. That surveillance data are a snapshot and help identify patterns and look for signals among vaccine breakthrough cases.”,
The CDC said.

Not very scientific.

Not scientific at all, in fact.

It is however, very misleading propaganda.

Vaccine sales pitch.

Netanyahu-esque.

Different but similar.

They claim 1 in 100,000 deaths associated with fully vaccinated people.

How much of an UNDERCOUNT is that?

Tell me how when you combine vaccines with efficacy assertions of between 67% and 95% you somehow supposedly achieve a .001% breakthrough rate.

Simply not possible, or even at all plausible.

If that isn’t true , then why mention it at all, it is far from scientific, and it is cherry picking data to the extreme.

They are using unreasonable misinformation in order to counter reasonable vaccine hesitancy and push the vaccine without stating the true facts.

These breakthrough cases, are they infectious?

And if so, of especially the mild illnesses and the asymptomatic,what is the true number ?

And are they then spreading potentially vaccine resistant mutant strains that they just unwittingly produced?

Is this also how strains are being mutated, multiplied, and spread, unbeknownst?

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

What the CDC admits reinforces my position, as it crumbles the foundation of your useless, petty arguments.

4Trinity
Guest
4Trinity
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Rather than attack, do you have a rebuttal? Something we can say “ahhh!” to?

Just curious…..again.

The cdc also changed their infamous Ct of 40-ish to 28 for people who are jabbed.

Find that honest and transparent do ya?

Auntie Ovine
Guest
Auntie Ovine
2 years ago
Reply to  4Trinity

Do you have a link to that? Because the only thing that was published was where the CDC was conducting a study on severe covid after vaccination. One of the parameters for that study was that the Ct was 28 or less.

The Ct for determining a positive or negative is a number by the manufacturer of the test equipment to meet the CDC standard for sensitivity and varies from manufacturer to manufacturer. And if that has changed as you say, some sort of documentation is needed to show that it is not just one of those deliberate misinterpretations that spread through anti vaxxer sites like wild fire.

So no, transparency is certainly lacking in the comment section for sure.

4Trinity
Guest
4Trinity
2 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Ovine

You are correct. The recommended Ct 28 is used in investigating “breakthrough cases”. These investigations are done in conjuction with state and local health departments.

What I get from that is if one was to become symptomatic (or not?) and was “vaccinated”, they would be tested under this investigative partnership. Question for the Good Doc?

What should be transparent is what is the Ct being used in most testing kits? Why is that being hidden?

Is it because it’s 35-50 cycles which is most likely a false-positive? Ct28 or less is considered more accurate. (second link)

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603

CharlesA
Guest
CharlesA
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Good Lord its hard to find a more defensive diatribe out there, and thats saying something. What a sad life to spend your time trying to convince others that ‘they are all out to get you’ and how only you can see the truth! 10,000 scientists and doctors and researchers ARE ALL LYING! Yeah! Thats it! They’re ALL in it together, and not one has spilled the beans!
But I know you wont read much more of this as you are already late for your ‘Q’ meeting most likely. I will say talking to a professional can turn your life into something positive! Imagine being a person who cares about others again!

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

From my comment above, I made a critical typo, which is why, apparently Auntie thought the implication was that vaccinated people were dying…

(There were actually very few vaccinated people that died in the 30 days, due virtually only to the fact that there were very few people vaccinated at the time, maybe less than 10%)

From the comment @ 10:17 on May 15,

It would have read, By the end of the 30 days, 75% of Israeli’s were “UN”vaccinated. (“vaccinated”, was a typo”

On the contrary, Auntie, my assertion was that almost nobody died that was vaccinated, but that had to do more with the fact that almost nobody was vaccinated in Israel at the time, so it was all that was possible, not some vaccine miracle, and it was spun and misrepresented by Netanyahu, it had virtually nothing to do with efficacy or science, and everything to do with timing, and twisting cherry picked data in order to mislead.

It was a hasty, meaningless, false equivalency conclusion, asserted 30 days after the first full vaccinations began, as if the vaccine was responsible.

Ridiculous propaganda.

Call me crazy
Guest
Call me crazy
2 years ago

Vaccine hesitancy

Specialist
Guest
Specialist
2 years ago

Such a great shot that only 1/2 of the NIH and FDA staff have taken it, even though they had first access. Per Fauci et al.

This clip is being widely shared on social media, but maybe not in everyone’s media echo chamber. You do know FB is keeping your algorithm tight, right?

https://t.me/cv19vaccine_reactions/663

Auntie Ovine
Guest
Auntie Ovine
2 years ago
Reply to  Specialist

Probably either Republican or minority. Both groups are reported to be suspicious about government scrutiny of vaccines.

“Black health care workers in particular have been reluctant to become vaccinated, with 53% of Black frontline health care workers saying they are not confident that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe. This holds steady across the general population — 47% of Black adults who are not necessarily health care workers feel similarly, according to the survey. ” https://www.cbsnews.com/news/health-care-workers-covid-19-vaccine-half-not-vaccinated/

“Republican Men Are Vaccine-Hesitant, But There’s Little Focus on Them” https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2021/04/23/republican-men-are-vaccine-hesitant-but-theres-little-focus-on-them

Specialist
Guest
Specialist
2 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Ovine

Nice sheepsplaining Ovine. I must be too stupid to interpret what I see with my own eyes or to know my own motivations. I am neither republican nor minority. Many refuseniks from all walks of life. But good try.

Meanwhile? Per OSHA, businesses that mandate employee vaccination are responsible for adverse effects.

Littlefoot
Guest
Littlefoot
2 years ago
Reply to  Specialist

So Pfizer can never be held responsible for any adverse affects, but your employer can! LOL. What a world we are living in.

4Trinity
Guest
4Trinity
2 years ago
Reply to  Specialist

Right-on Specialist.

This might help explain why minorities are a little distrustful:

“Thousands of Latinos were sterilized in the 20th century. Amid COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, they remember.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/03/16/covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-latino-sterilizations-coronavirus/6834662002/

The majority were, until now, rarely the group experimented on.

Aye, Littlefoot. Think how many small buisnesses will crash and burn while Big Pharma reaps the profits.

Time for a new James McMurtry tune.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iv0q3cW3x1s

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago

“A chain is only as strong as it’s weakest link”.

“PEW TRUSTS .ORG”

Sounds about right.

Doesn’t sound like it even comes close to passing the sniff test.

Is that the kind of data the foundation of your position is based on?

Sounds like it must be crawling with flies.

Or viruses.

Or what you might find at a superspreader event.

No thanks.

I’ll pass.

Auntie Ovine
Guest
Auntie Ovine
2 years ago
Reply to  Guest

The trouble comes in for your idea of the “sniff test” when it can’t tell much of anything outside of the clouds of own miasma. Anyone who evaluates reliablity on whether something agrees with them or not is in serious trouble as far as common sense goes. And that’s exactly what your condemnation came down to- it agrees with my position. Has it occured to you that it would be impossible to do otherwise if one’s position is derived from least biased data? It’s the difference between saying you are wrong and simply saying you do not like something whether it’s right or not.

BTW the Pew Trust, despite your bad but somewhat funny pun, is one of least biased and most reliable source of political information on the internet. Which I admit is not a high standard to meet.

If you don’t like Pew, then here are other sources. If you are not going to automatically reject everything out of hand if it is different than you choose to believe anyway.

https://phys.org/news/2021-04-republicans-vaccine-hesitant-coronavirus-pandemic.html a singularly non inflamatory look at vaccine hesitancy. As the author of the study stated ” “We didn’t expect the paper to be political in nature. We collected a lot of demographic data such as age, gender, race, income, etc. It just happened to be that political party was the best predictor of the divergent trends.” It focused, mostly by accident, on the news sources that lead to the politicalization of the issue and that rings true for me. Press bias feeds distrust but not just of the right but equally of the left. Sucks for science. Makes money for media.

https://bangordailynews.com/2021/05/04/national-politics/republicans-seek-to-convince-vaccine-skeptics-within-their-ranks/

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Ovine

Where’s your sense of humor?

Oh, well, at least you found it somewhat funny.😁

AA
Guest
AA
2 years ago

How are they treating covid? I hope that whoever needs treatment gets what they need. Condolences to the departed. So sad.

4Trinity
Guest
4Trinity
2 years ago

Little off-topic….anyone read the Dark Winter script?

It’s an earlier version of Event201 and Agenda30.

Pretty revealing:

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events-archive/2001_dark-winter/Dark%20Winter%20Script.pdf

The Plan has been in the pipeline for a long time.

fishkiller
Guest
fishkiller
2 years ago
Reply to  4Trinity

I hadn’t read it….just heard Whitney Webb discuss.

Slide 9
• Restrict smallpox patients to dedicated facilities? – voluntary vs. mandatory
• Assemble contacts of patients in designated sites? – voluntary vs. mandatory
• Establish national travel policies? – voluntary vs. mandatory
• Legislation to prohibit dangerous information?

How many times did creepy uncle Joe utter the words “Dark Winter”?………we know he can’t form a coherent sentence on his own……..who wrote the words on the teleprompter and why?

4Trinity
Guest
4Trinity
2 years ago

Speaing of Plans and pipelines, this has been in there a while as well.

“Tiny, Wireless, Injectable Chips Use Ultrasound to Monitor Body Processes”

https://www.engineering.columbia.edu/press-releases/shepard-injectable-chips-monitor-body-processes

“Application of a sub–0.1-mm3 implantable mote for in vivo real-time wireless temperature sensing

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/7/19/eabf6312

Big question is have they already been involintarily used? I know…..”quack” idea.

What is up with the magnetic pull/jab site thingy? Scam?

fishkiller
Guest
fishkiller
2 years ago
Reply to  4Trinity

It’s crazy how much is plainly out in the public domain, but to even mention any of it is “conspiracy nonsense”

I don’t know what to make of all those videos showing the magnetic injection site.

Time will tell.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
2 years ago
Reply to  fishkiller

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”
William Casey, CIA Director, Feb. 1981