Two New Cases Reported Today, October 6

Press release from Humboldt County COVID19 – Joint Information Center:novel coronavirus Covid-19 Humboldt

A total of 524 Humboldt County residents have tested positive for COVID-19 after two additional cases were reported today.

Today, the California Department of Public Health moved Humboldt County into the least restrictive, yellow tier under the state’s “Blueprint for a Safer Economy.” Detailed information about local impacts of the change in tiers will be provided tomorrow.

Today’s alert level stands at two or level yellow. Visit humboldtgov.org/dashboard to view the county’s Alert Level Assessment tool.

For the most recent COVID-19 information, visit cdc.gov or cdph.ca.gov. Local information is available at humboldtgov.org or during business hours by contacting [email protected] or calling 707-441-5000.
Humboldt County COVID-19 Data Dashboard: humboldtgov.org/dashboard,
Follow us on Facebook: @HumCoCOVID19,
Instagram: @HumCoCOVID19,
Twitter: @HumCoCOVID19, and
Humboldt Health Alert: humboldtgov.org/HumboldtHealthAlert

Earlier Test Results: (See also here)
Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

157 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago

For crying out loud, how many people weren’t diagnosed with cancer, heart disease, because thus little bitch ca’llee Covid is taking all the oxygen out of the room

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

Does wearing a mask reduce cancer rates?

No.

Do your part.

If you don't run you rust
Guest
If you don't run you rust
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

PeeWeeLies comments definitely take most of the joy out of this news blog.
Get a new rant of come up with something more original, so stale, so sad.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago

Yes.

[edit] is my least favorite.

No points, junk info, and David Icke repto-fantasies.

Researcher talks to [edit] like he listens, but he doesn’t. He won’t, he can’t.

His job, literally, is to misinform Americans.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Kym- this is the sort of thing that calls any pretence of objectivity into question. What is likely to happen is that this comment will be edited to remove the direct insults to a commenter but leave the words that the moderator find congenial so as leave the intent to insult in place.

rollin
Guest
rollin
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I guess calling someone “liar Daddy” is not an an insult though huh? Funny, cause here’s what you said to me TWO DAYS AGO regarding a Mark Twain quote that I posted rather than a direct insult.

October 5, 2020 3:36 pm

When I think a quote is a pointed insult at another commenter, I delete it.

Indeed, the pretense of objectivity is gone.

hypocrisy
[həˈpäkrəsē]
NOUN
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one’s own behavior does not conform; pretense.

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
3 years ago
Reply to  rollin

You’re right ROLLIN, however to be correct. KK has admitted to being biased, that’s not a defect nor a problem, it’s merely a point of contention.

On this site, to contend one’s view point isn’t always productive, in fact, in can be insulting and slanderous.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  rollin

His name is “Papa w lies”.

And “liar daddy” is an insult?

And you guys call Democrats snowflakes?

Liar daddy, or, papa liar is the same commentor who used various handles like “The Unreal Brian” and “The Real Fake Brian” to twist the name game up further in other ways.

Me addressing him as liar daddy is not a big deal, and it’s quite accurate.

But bemoan away and make the most of these grumblings of yours.

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Not true KK.

Your ankle-biter has called another commenter what is surely a bad, mean, ugly name several times now.

Try harder will you please?

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Cool, ankle-biter determines when he’s insulted or not but anybody else is SOL.

//Love that sweet consistency.//

Roll on school marm.

******************************************

Your failure to moderate is the fact that if I post you require 7 hours to decide if you like what I say. Wonderful ! Highly professional.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Rod Gass

Or the toilet article. Priority for a local news site

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Eating healthy, exercising, and avoiding drugs/alcohol/tobacco surely do. Are you doing by your part? You’re forcing increased premiums into my insurance rates with your unhealthy lifestyle. That’s preventable too. Please think about how your actions effect others. 😉

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

This new culture will come after your poor choices, it’s a tragedy that there is so much crap food being consumed.

I for one , feel junk food should be taxed like cigarettes, if it was cheaper to eat healthy, we wouldn’t be in this predicament

This is my wish.

Outlaw empty calories

Too many obese people wearing designer masks.

Apathy and ignorance on full display

Bryan
Guest
Bryan
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

You want to tax children for the candy & ice cream they purchase?
Give the government more money to waste? Gimme a break!!

Plenty of people choose to smoke and drink, no matter the price or taxes – taxing isn’t the answer, education is.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Bryan

Mostly older people smoke, they got started in their teens when the government subsidized tobacco and the Experts and even Doctors on TV told them Virginia slims and Camels were good for you.

50 years later, I suspect they think the damage is already done so why quit now.

People don’t much like being taxed for it, or bitched at about especially by liberals who live on donuts and Ice cream.

Right MMJ consumers?

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Taxing tobacco good/taxing MMJ cruel.

How many newbey cannabis socialists can’t learn this?

Bryan
Guest
Bryan
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Current cigarette smoking was highest among people aged 25–44 years and 45–64 years.

https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm

Bryan
Guest
Bryan
3 years ago
Reply to  Bryan

Funny you defend cigarettes but bash ice cream, on top of that make it political. I should know better than to waste my time with anoymous commenters. Have a good day

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Bryan

Thereally is no saneed or logic defense of junk food.

I would say homemade ice cream would be great. ..

But every thing with HFCS hits the same receptors as drugs

Amazing that you world defend empty calories for children.

Look at the obese children and ask yourself why this is acceptable.

Childhood diabetes?

Let’s keep the children on that sugar on a stick, and you see the health crisis we arerefusing to manage effectively. If you aren’t able to connect the health of our planet to the health of our collective society, we are shooting ourselves in the feet.

Bryan
Guest
Bryan
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

I defend taxing ice cream, not poor health. It’s important to have half decent reading comprehension if you want to debate.

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

It’s sort of mind-blowing that you accept that cigarette smoking is bad. I’m sure back in the old days there were plenty of people who believed that was a conspiracy too. How do you not understand that you are the modern-day equivalent of this?

Bryan
Guest
Bryan
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

If cigarette smoking isn’t bad, then its the emphysema that is.
I’ll stick to my ice cream – I can work that off with physical labor if needed – you cant get back the oxygen you rob your mind obviously.
Smoke em if you gottem!!

Bryan
Guest
Bryan
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

Pull the bong out of holio, might help your mind from blowing.

researcher
Guest
researcher
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

PWL, the posters are right. Its getting old. Everyone gets that you think covid is a non issue. Unfortunately, a virus is a real thing, and a nasty one is circulating the planet with no signs of letting up. How it got started, or why is immaterial. Right now all we really know is that masks, distancing, avoiding crowds and washing slow it down. As TRB says, do your part.

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

Nope.

//How it got started, or why is immaterial.//

I realize that some of you folks are in constant fear and panic, that’s gotta be rough. Most of us are fighting tooth and nail to hold on. Fear is the fright that kills. The fight is your savior.

Understanding your true adversary, covid, is done with a calm fearless learning process. To stop the killer, means to understand everything about the existence of the virus, particularly where/how it was created.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

Tell that to the 4 people I lost this year…

what’s old is everyone’s teeny Bopper Kardashian infatuation with the fucking daily reports and soap opera sadness.

Why does it take all the fucking oxygen out of the real issues facing this republic.

So many brain dead people can’t tell a soft coup when they see one.

Fuck Covid and the Hollywood Industrial Complex thats ruining our society, and corrupting our youth.

You want some real food for thought?

The government keeps asking free healthy people to keep paying for runaway spending, while our economy is in a nose dive.

You socialist cult members have no idea what indentured servitude is, if you can’t see China, Australia, UK, and all these other country’s locking up its people for speaking out.

Kym thinks fact check websites are neutral, but all the Whistle blowers ate being censored.

If you think that is American, you should move to another country.

37th in education is well understood by lookin at the depth of people’s understanding of conspiracy.

26th in health care is what really gets me.

Hospitals suck for almost everything else but trauma medicine. ..

You keep posting the covid conjob, I’ll keep reminding you that there’s plenty of other things that will kill you slowly, if Covid keeps the #1 spot on the charts.

Fuck the Covid mental sickness.

Fuck corporate media.

Fuck the censorship

Fuck the political monster that demands more taxes for less representation.

This country is going to implode If we don’t stop the cancer in government.

Willie Bray
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

🕯🌳And what party is doing the run away spending? What parties in charge right now?

Swine
Guest
Swine
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

Do they? It seems like its still going on and most people getting it are maskers

Swine
Guest
Swine
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Can u point to a report sayinf the majority of people getting it arent wearing masks?

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Kym I have given you a link about the 40 year study about mask INEFFECTIVENESS for flu viruses, and you replied with a ONE OFF incident of two hairdressers who tested POSITIVE (FALSE POSITIVES? ) and didn’t infect customers.

You are not a neutral arbiter of this information and you spend WAY TO MUCH TIME SITTING ON YOUR BUTT reinforcing the medical professionals , and establishment yalking points and opinions about what healthy people need to do.

If you are elderly and have several underlying health issues, a mask isn’t going to make you healthy. Changing your eating habits, lifestyle choices and nutritionalsupplements will do much more than listening to a medical and science establishment that is predominantly funded by big pharmaceutical.

You ARE Investing SO MUCH energy into borderline MALPRACTICE by our medical agencies who are not liable for people who lose their jobs and homes becauseof a weaponized flu virus.

If you look at why the covid 19 flu was given gain of function in wuhan after being researched and studyes in North Carolina, you might find yourself up against your own ignorance with who is responsible for this.

But you have a selective version crush on the truth, if you can find the answers on a quick Google search.

Have you read the section Guest sent you on agenda 21?

Do you understand what the significance of giving jurisdiction of many significant areas over to the United Nations.

Do you believe the United States is worth saving?

The people of Soviet Union had to be demoralized, before their country could be successfully overthrown, this is historical and psychological TRUTH about how countries can be detonated from within.

I see the country under attack and you think wearing a mask, will NOT LEAD TO FORCED /Mandatory vaccinations.

I see people who refuse to accept the tragedies learned by stalin, hitler, and mao, etc as funded by the same people who are pushing this revolution.

I hope you find the truth and wake up to your programming.

This Covid culture is being pushed by useful idiot parroting the medical establishment talking points.

Get off your ass aND get your health back, kym.

If you are not in good health, you can not find clarity in this world, you just keep popping oreos in your biological, when maybe celery juice and carrot sticks would be a better choice.

Please consider doing a guided juice fast to clean your Temple, so that you may regain some semblance of health.

I’m rooting for you, but you have to decide that it is time.

Good luck with eliminating the processed food.

Lemon water, and heavy doses of vitamin C.

You can find a product that will help eliminate your intestinal build up. *Oxypowder*, then switch to all raw food during this fall harvest.

We all need better health. But it won’t come from a doctor.

Let thy medicine be thy food, and let thy food be thy medicine.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
3 years ago
Reply to  Swine

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

[Quote]

There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Kym, wake up.

For God’s sake, why do you keep believing in POLITICAL AND MEDICAL THEATER?

If the Internet shut down, maybe you could think clearly again.

This is my wish.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I sent you the link to the 40 year study.

READ IT AGAIN

You said it was old information.

The technology behind surgical masks haven’t changed.

Read the insert of the n95 respirator.

Do your due diligence, instead of showing us your cognitive bias .

You hold that cell phone to your head?

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

If you try to follow the link to the actual online published JAMMA study at the bottom of the page in your first linked article you get this message:

“Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.”

That’s kinda suspect, no?

From your 2nd linked article:

“The World Health Organization found NO EVIDENCE that wearing a surgical mask by healthy persons can prevent acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 [35]. However, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends the use of cloth face coverings in communities with significant community-based transmission [36]. This shift of recommendation was based on the finding of pre-symptomatic shedding of SARS-CoV-2 and the presence of asymptomatic patients with high viral loads in the community. Face mask usage may serve as source control by preventing dispersal of droplets during talking, sneezing, and coughing, and also reduce the risk of environmental contamination by SARS-CoV-2. Our results showed that masking of the challenged index appeared to be more important than masking the to-be-exposed healthy hamsters, which is consistent with the findings in a systematic review on influenza transmission [37].”

So, there’s still no evidence that masks work against protecting you from viruses, and yet they still recommend wearing masks. It also states that masking works better at containing virus spread in infected people than for preventing infection in healthy people? Does a surgical mask only filter in one direction? What about cloth masks? Does this make sense to you?

Also, how are they finding these people who are asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic? Why would you get tested if you don’t show symptoms? There’s also no annotations behind the findings for the pre and asymptomatic people which means there’s no confirmed studies that support that hypothesis.

How does the evidence given in these articles support your position? On a casual glance it does, but if you read the entire article or try to fact check their sources it doesn’t seem to. What do you think?

Swine
Guest
Swine
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

And still… I bet most people who gey the disease are good mask wearong citizen except maybe the kooks in the white house. Ill give you that cluster

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

She’s repeatedly looked for information to back her bias that masks are effective and should be worn.

Many people here have pointed her to the direction of these statements, but she has a hard time ignoring the fact that masks are subjecting healthy people to go above and beyond for a flu virus that isn’t ad deadly as the MASSIVE PUBLIC CAMPAIGN WOULD LIKE YOU BELIEVE.

this is not about the flu.

This is about people control.

And she doesn’t believe there is a conspiracy at the root of all this Covid.

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

Masks only work aslong as distancing is used in conjunction. Now that’s some funny sheet. Distancing is all that is needed.

Willie Bray
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Lone Ranger

🕯🌳You and you partners don’t want to do either but you and your partners want everyone else to.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Kym,

I know you want volunteer fact checkers helping your comment section, but really.

You have Ullr and others still posting junk that masks don’t help, months after being shown repeatedly otherwise.

He’s been fact checked.

Then there is liar daddy, who is telling you to eat raw because your fat and need to keep your temple clean (to battle a virus?).

I mean, really.

Off with their proverbial heads.

It’s ridiculous to allow so much trash on any site on the net.

I know. You protect it. You won’t change. It’s important to read rubbish 5x more than good comments for some reason…..

Okeedokkee.

Good day to you.

No response needed.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

All hail the arbiter of arbitrary Truth!

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

It’s hard to fathom why you’re keeping up the culture war so hard.

It’s absurd.

From the President’s anecdotals to common sense, masks help.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I know this hard to fathom, but the actual studies on the effecies of mask is very limited due to ethical obligations. The few that exist are not double blind studies, and they show that masks, properly worn, are not effective and in properly worn are counter productive.

“Mainstream” scientific organizations won’t publish studies that run counter to current narrative because they have become highly politicized. I linked to existing studies on masks published by NIH and they echo what was in the linked story above.

Even current CDC guidelines for contact tracing do not justify masks in most scenarios : six feet or less continuously for 15 minutes with a symptomatic person is considered close contact. That scenario is very rare in day to day activities.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

..six feet or less continuously for 15 minutes with a symptomatic person is considered close contact. That scenario is very rare in day to day activities.

Um. It’s quite common actually. Not everyone is a Trinity hermit, no disrespect.

As an anti masker who touts person responsibility as a totem, you must be aghast at The Presidents lack of measures for masking when not social distancing, or social distancing at all.

Right?

I guess being a germaphobe was just one more lie from Trump?

What a fool he is, right?

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Can’t fix ignorance, without a shock to the system.

Who is holding the shock pads????????????????????????

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

…and his follow up.

Still No Conclusive Evidence Justifying Mandatory Masks

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/still-no-conclusive-evidence-justifying-mandatory-masks

[Quote]

In June, we published Denis Rancourt’s white paper titled “Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy.” As of this date, the article has been viewed over 460,000 times world-wide. And, as the Reader’s publisher I pledged to publish all letters, guest commentaries, or studies refuting Rancourt’s general premise that this mask-wearing culture and shaming could be more harmful than helpful.

In retrospect, Rancourt’s specific premise is that there are no gold-standard (a.k.a. policy-grade) randomized controlled tests that prove masks work effectively to stop the spread of a respiratory virus.

The masks-may-be-more-harmful-than-helpful assertion is associated with the open questions Rancourt posed regarding unknown consequences of mandated masking being considered by thousands of local and state government officials, both elected and unelected.

We received many submissions against and for Rancourt’s paper. After reviewing the attempted refutations, we remain resolute in our original support for his conclusions. Not one proved Rancourt’s analysis of the randomized controlled tests to be false or misleading. Nor did any of the attempted refutations answer or overcome any of Rancourt’s concerns regarding potential harm from mandated mask wearing.

However, in the spirit of open debate and sharing opposing views, we provide links to several of the submitted refutation efforts below. While some submitters resorted to unpersuasive ad hominem attacks on Rancourt, we stand by Rancourt’s scientific and academic credentials, training, experience, and capabilities to provide the analysis and review of said RCT’s.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

CDC Pressed to Acknowledge Industry Funding
Monday, November 18, 2019

A petition from advocacy groups is calling for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to stop claiming it does not have relationships with or accept financial support from drug manufacturers and other companies that might benefit from agency research.

The CDC has accepted millions of dollars through the CDC Foundation, according to the groups behind the petition. During fiscal years 2014 through 2018, the CDC Foundation received $79.6 million from companies like Pfizer, Biogen, and Merck. Since it was created by Congress in 1995, the nonprofit organization has accepted $161 million from corporations.

Public Citizen, Knowledge Ecology International, Liberty Coalition, Project on Government Oversight, and U.S. Right to Know filed the petition. The groups are concerned about the pharmaceutical industry’s possible undue influence on medical research and practice.

While CDC disclaimers state that the agency doesn’t accept commercial support, the CDC media office has contradicted this. “The CDC claims its public-private partnerships are synergistic and beneficial,” the petition states, “but these partnerships are incompatible with its disclaimers of no commercial support and no relationships with manufacturers of commercial products. The CDC cannot have it both ways: It must end this oxymoronic situation of defending its receipt of corporate money while simultaneously denying that it does.”

Source: STAT, November 5, 2019.

https://www.ashclinicalnews.org/online-exclusives/cdc-pressed-acknowledge-industry-funding/

Follow the money!

rollin
Guest
rollin
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Here is a link from the CDC showing that: “14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

Any chance Kym Kemp will take note of the points that free estimates made regarding her links and the fact that there IS NO LINK to the “increasing evidence” that masks work, a direct contradiction to this link from May 2020? No chance. The link Kym posted has no randomized studies, just an anecdotal story about a couple of hairdressers.

Any chance “The Real Brian” will do anything other than proclaim that the matter is settled cuz he said so. 100% NO CHANCE. And therein lies the problem. Neither of you are interested in knowing if you’re wrong. You completely ignore inconvenient facts, like the one citing 14 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDIES, and grasp at any link, article or fake news story you can find to try and make your point. Then you have the balls to preach to the rest of us about science.

If your goal was anything other than virtue signaling, that is to say, pretending like you give a shit, then you would make an earnest effort to actually understand why the about face in opinion from the CDC, surgeon general, WHO and countless others based on YEARS of randomized studies. Instead, you cherry pick links and ignore the double standard of said agencies; birds of a feather I guess. Any chance you can verbally explain why 14 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDIES that mattered 3 months ago no longer matter to all of you good libs out there who incessantly preach about “the science”? Nope!

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  rollin

To burst your bubble:

From your link:

Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size, and some studies also reported suboptimal adherence in the face mask group.

Frankly, I highly doubt you read and understood this all.

And now you’re also wrong about the chance of me responding.

🥳😉

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  rollin

Let’s keep bubble popping!

From your link:

There are still few uncertainties in the practice of face mask use, such as who should wear the mask and how long it should be used for.

In theory, transmission should be reduced the most if both infected members and other contacts wear masks, but compliance in uninfected close contacts could be a problem (12,34). Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission (39). Thus, education on the proper use and disposal of used face masks, including hand hygiene, is also needed.

And:


Respirators are tight-fitting masks that can protect the wearer from fine particles (37) and should provide better protection against influenza virus exposures when properly worn because of higher filtration efficiency. However, respirators, such as N95 and P2 masks, work best when they are fit-tested, and these masks will be in limited supply during the next pandemic. These specialist devices should be reserved for use in healthcare settings or in special subpopulations such as immunocompromised persons in the community, first responders, and those performing other critical community functions, as supplies permit.

💭-pop.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  rollin

Let’s keep bubble popping!

From your link:

There are still few uncertainties in the practice of face mask use, such as who should wear the mask and how long it should be used for.

In theory, transmission should be reduced the most if both infected members and other contacts wear masks, but compliance in uninfected close contacts could be a problem (12,34). Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission (39). Thus, education on the proper use and disposal of used face masks, including hand hygiene, is also needed.

And:


Respirators are tight-fitting masks that can protect the wearer from fine particles (37) and should provide better protection against influenza virus exposures when properly worn because of higher filtration efficiency. However, respirators, such as N95 and P2 masks, work best when they are fit-tested, and these masks will be in limited supply during the next pandemic. These specialist devices should be reserved for use in healthcare settings or in special subpopulations such as immunocompromised persons in the community, first responders, and those performing other critical community functions, as supplies permit.

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Uh, bro… You totally just repeated my arguments to the tee. How does that support your position? What bubbles were popped?

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

Thank you Rover.

The truth is not very popular at the moment.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

Masks do not prevent childhood obesity.

I saw a group of young obese girls. Walking away from the market with bags of junk food.

It made me so sad to see them wearing masks, and have so little regard for health.

It’s a testament to the judgement of a person who cannot make good decisions that affect their health.

These people are struggling with any sense of personal love and satisfaction, and they get into a SUV THAT HAD KILL RACISTS ON THE BACK.

it wouldn’t be a fair fight.

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  Swine

Swine do you need a study to see that less spit goes flying when you have mask on your face?

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

Bongholio, you are correct that any facial covering will limit spittle and larger moisture particles.

The issue is that this virus is also carried through aerosolized particles. The masks the public have been instructed to use cannot physically stop aerosolized particles because they are smaller than what the mask filters out (for surgical and cloth masks not n95 respirators).

Another issue is the fit of masks. If the mask isn’t completely sealed against your face, it’s efficacy drops significantly (i.e. when I wear my mask, my glasses fog up–therefore it isn’t a sealed device and won’t protect me or others from aerosolized particles).

These are some of the concerns that myself and others have with the medical recommendations being distributed to the public by various governmental organizations. I would encourage you to be vigilant in discerning information being distributed right now and make your own decisions about its credibility. A lot of it is misleading or contains half-truths.

Also, don’t forget the t.p. for your bunghole. 😆😂🤣 I think I need a crappacino…

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

– Kym

Since Trump snowflakes are crying like [edit] about calling a liar a liar, I’m fake insulted by the end of this comment too.

Please protect us all from bad vibes and pro-fake anti-snowflakism

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

When did I mention Trump? Why are you offended? I didn’t reply to any of your messages. I never called you a liar. You need a hug, bro? We can meet at Holiday Market. I want some sushi. I’m holding some malachite right now and sending loving crystal energy your way… Namaste

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

So, your Papa Liar.

Got it.

I know a few of your names, but didnt have “free estimates” on the radar.

Thanks for the tip.

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

Uh, no. Can you discern the syntax and way that I present arguments? Is that similar to the way papa presents his/her ideas? NO, IT IS NOT. Do you see that I leave annotations and links for my positions? Are you able to fathom that multiple people in this area hold viewpoints that are counter to your own? I am also not hot coffee, Sid, or anyone else that is occupying your headspace rent free. WTF! Hey Kym! Can you at least validate my comment and tell this dude he’s delusional? Pretty please?

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

I’m fine with being wrong if that’s the case.

But if Kym doesn’t know you personally, there is no way to verify.

So let’s just say I’m wrong, and you’re right and move on.

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  Free estimates

Brian, there’s a way to verify that Kym can confirm. You can ask her if the name and email address used for these posts are aligned with the IP I’ve been using, and that those have been consistent throughout my posting history. I can promise that it is. Kym can confirm or deny my claim. Thanks. I don’t know Kym. If you do, you can ask her personally or on this blog. I look forward to seeing your findings. ✌️

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Brian,

You treat Kym like she’s your secretary whining and crying everyday….

Don’t let these people post…..
There all sid…..
On and On

It’s nice that you let her police your site…geez!

PS I hope you getting professional help for your issues.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

The spit lands inside your mask, so lets take Bidens last appearance.

Goes to podium with mask on.
Takes it off to speak stuffs it in his pocket.
Wipes snot from his nose 4 or 5 times.
Puts snot loaded hand all over the mic and podium.
Sticks his snot loaded hand into his pocket to get his mask.
Puts his mask now contaminated with snot back on his face.
Next he will put his mask back into his snot contaminated pocket.

And he’s not the only one that does this.
Because that’s safe.

Nine To Five
Guest
Nine To Five
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Swine,
I beg your pardon,
You need to look no further than the Rose Garden.

Angela Robinson
Guest
Angela Robinson
3 years ago
Reply to  Nine To Five

Thanks for the earworm. 🙂

Great comment.

Swine
Guest
Swine
3 years ago
Reply to  Nine To Five

Yes of course bring up the biggest news in msm… Try harder.

Nine To Five
Guest
Nine To Five
3 years ago
Reply to  Swine

Look, Swine, it’s pretty simple.

If everyone wore masks only maskers would be getting covid.

If nobody wore masks only non maskers would be getting it.

I believe it is safe to say that the vast majority of people wear masks.

It might then be true that the majority of people who contract Covid19 are mask wearers, and that non mask wearers do not represent the majority of infections.

That is a meaningless argument, however, as non mask wearers are among the vast minority.

It has nothing to do with whether masks work or not.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
3 years ago
Reply to  Nine To Five

Northern europe and Scandinavia have very low mask-wearing rates and low case mortality. Southern europe has a very high mask-wearing rate and high case mortality.

Yes, correlation is not causation, but it is a curious phenomenon.

Nine To Five
Guest
Nine To Five
3 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

So, I looked up what I thought might be pertinent to your observation.

Population densities and which strains were prevalent in each area, and their virulence.
And what do you know, just as I suspected…

Scandinavia (Sweden) is about one fifth as densely populated as Southern Europe. 58 vs 304 per square mile.
And one strain of SARS-CoV-2 in Sweden is more contagious and less deadly than those in Southern Europe.

The mask debate is much more nuanced than just whether you wear one or not.

It’s kind of like comparing survival rates of a bear encounter without taking into account whether your talking about black bears or your talking about grizzlies.

There are many different strains
and mutations of SARS-CoV-2.
Some are more deadly than others, and occupy different parts of the world.

Southern Europe is more crowded with deadlier virus components that Scandinavia/ Northern Europe. ( I used Sweden )

Explains your observation,irregardless of the mask component.

You hear what you want to hear.

The mask debate is much more complex than just black or white.

Could be that where the case fatality is low there is less concern and therefore less masking and where the fatality rate is higher there is more of an incentive to wear a mask.
Simple.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
3 years ago
Reply to  Nine To Five

Thanks for the follow up. I agree that the mask debate is more nuanced than represented… in fact, the whole thing is more nuanced than represented, but the powers-that-be would rather treat us like toddlers than giving us the best information so we can make the best decisions.

Surveys have shown that places with increased cases have a population that responds with more mask wearing.

The past 9 months have shown that “experts” are dealing with more unknowns than knowns but still fallback on their, so-called, expertise to pretend they know.

“15 days to flatten the curve.” I think we almost got it, now.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

But that presumes “slowing it down” is the absolute good to be pursued at any cost. For an individual who believes that being infected will have the worst possible outcome, there fear makes extreme restrictions for everyonethe only course. But for the majority of people who will survive even without a vaccine, what if these restrictions just keep the infections spreading at a low level for years? What if, in the pursuit of salvation of the few, these long lasting restrictions lead to huge social disruptions causing economic failures or conflicts between people set up to prosper within the restrictions while those who everyone needs to do work the isolationist require get really resentful of being used. Then wars to take shrinking resources happen or simply because an aggressive country sees an opportunity to grab land or power. What if these disruptions cause more deaths than the much fewer deaths that delaying infections save. Because for most people, the longer the pandemic keeps circulating, the more chance that even extreme isolationist will be exposed anyway.

If you think this is a far reach,just look at the violent protests, the conflicts springing up, the military posturing going on increasingly after just the 7. There were already enough non working people looking for trouble before we started putting people out of work deliberately. Well that’s enough speculation for now. But it would be beneficial to keep in mind that the stress added by pandemic restrictions is not free of problems.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Jesus Christ, like its sooo fucking hard to wear a mask.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Geist

It’s so fucking hard to remind people that they have absolutely NO GUARANTEES.

NO LIABILITY.

LOOKS LIKE THEY ARE FORCING THE PUBLIC TO ENGAGE IN FANTASY Football

how else can you look at mandatory equipment that has absolutely no liability for its effectiveness. ?

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

It’s like they’re forcing you to wipe your ass! But it takes SO LONG and you like the smell!

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Geist

Actually I do wear a mask when in public. I was doing it before there was any public orders to do so and before 99 out of a 100 people did. Nothing in my comment mentions masks. However it is clear that haters are eager to latch onto anything as an excuse for venting their poison that they must read by sporadically catching words they think serve their purpose in spewing. They don’t read to comprehend. They only wish to abuse to make themselves feel more important.

Then again it’s not to be expected otherwise. A small percentage in any group has to oppose others just based their own psychology.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Geist

Wearing a mask is the easy part….
Listening to the power and control addicts is the hard part.

Trump has it right Trust the people to decide whats best for their situation. Stop crawling up their butts with mandates.

But I guess some of you don’t feel safe without a nanny.

stuber
Guest
stuber
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

The Chinese Communist government spread this all over the world, particularly the US, to slow our economies, and help them achieve world dominance. They want to destroy our way of life, to them, black lives do not matter, nor do white lives, and any in between. No Christians, Jews, or gays allowed. Why are people arguing about masks and these things. We should be united in our efforts to stop the spread of Chinese dominance, their over fishing our oceans, destroying coral reef systems, and polluting more than any other country in the world. The US is sterile in comparison to their pollutants. When trump halted flights from China, he was called a racist by democrats, including Biden, but it did slow down the spread. The Chinese are responsible for all this, unite to destroy their power, buy American, make things here in America.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  stuber

Say It Again, and again, and again til people who think differently will recognize the global financial war for what it is.

A different kind of coup.

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
3 years ago
Reply to  stuber

Stuber, I agree.

Way, way back in the day 55 years ago while I was a
HS freshman. I was assigned to compile a student report on the overpopulation of China. It was run-away rampant then. Their natural resources were burnt for cooking fires.

Bring us up to date and we’ll be sad to discover that zero students’ assignments are still objective investigations. Today it’s follow the progressive direction or be … wrong.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Rod Gass

CHINA’S 3 GORGES DAM MAY COLLAPSE FLOODS CRACKS & LEAKS UPDATE 8TH OCTOBER 2020
A run through of what has happened over the last 4 months on the Dam DAM along with the daily update 10/4/2020.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5Cqu7AGezA

‘Everything is gone.’ Flooding in China ruins farmers and risks rising food prices

from libs trusted CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/08/economy/china-food-economy-flooding-intl-hnk/index.html

Iconic ‘American’ Brands That Are Foreign-Owned
Some “American” brands that we know and love are owned by foreign companies.
By
ABC News
May 30, 2013, 2:03 PM
• 3 min read

June 2, 2013— — intro: Bacon, sausage and ham are such mainstays of American diets, it’s hard to imagine that the largest U.S. pork provider, Smithfield Ham, the 87-year-old Virginia-based meat giant, might soon be owned by the Chinese.

But thanks to a recent $4.7 billion cash acquisition, Shuanghai International Holdings, the majority shareholder of Henan Shuanghui Investment & Development Co., China’s largest meat processing enterprise, will now be the parent company of brands like Armour, Farmland and Healthy Ones.

If the deal goes through (there are political worries about Chinese food safety, and another company could always step in and make another offer), it will be the largest acquisition of an American company by a Chinese outfit. According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2012, Chinese buyers agreed to spend $11.57 billion in 49 deals to acquire U.S. companies or stakes in U.S. firms.

Some of the brands that we know and love, and consider to be quintessentially American, are actually owned by foreign companies. Here are some of them.

quicklist: title:VASELINE text: Back in 1872, a named Robert Chesebrough invented a petroleum jelly that he patented as Vaseline. The product was used as an antiseptic during World War II, and eventually became the top producer of petroleum jelly in the US. In 1987, its parent company was bought by British/Dutch monolith, Unilever N.V.

quicklist: title: BEN & JERRY’S text: Founded in 1978 by fun-loving hippies Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield in Burlington, Vermont, Ben & Jerry’s and their funky flavors–Cherry Garcia! ChubbyHubby!–is an American institution. But thirteen years ago, it, too, was acquired by Unilever, the British/Dutch company.

quicklist: title: GERBER text: The “Gerber” baby is almost as famous as the baby food of the same name. Founded by the Fremont Canning Company in Fremont, Mich., in 1927, the company eventually became part of Swiss pharmaceutical company, Novartis. Today, Gerber owns more than 80 percent of the U.S. market for baby food.

quicklist: title: PURINA text: In 1894, Wiliam H. Danforth of St. Louis launched an animal feed company. More than 100 years later, Purina still produces a range of dog and cat food. But it’s no longer American-owned. In 2001, Nestle, a Swiss company, lapped it up.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/iconic-american-brands-foreign-owned/story?id=19291042

Think people…think!
Shouldn’t we own our own food sources?
Those that control food control your life.
City dwellers don’t grow much food.

Who keeps taking a stand for our farmers? Trump

Me
Guest
Me
3 years ago

“sIx mOnTHs ToO FLatTEn ThE CurVE “
🙄🙄🙄

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Me

Six months of what? Lockdown? “Lockdown Joe” is on the dem ticket. Deep State Dems have 3 primary goals: 1) win the election. 2) get rid of Joe. 3) destroy America.

Skitty
Guest
Skitty
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I would say # 1 is get rid of Trump.

researcher
Guest
researcher
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Trump is in Putin’s pocket. That’s the greatest threat we’ve ever faced from Russia. They are inside our system, slowly eating their way through what is left of the democracy that we have fought so hard to maintain. And Putin laughs every time they see so called patriots like the Proud boys running interference for them. America, though it’s actions and ideals can be miles apart, is still our country. And by “our” I mean every person who is an American citizen. And we’re tired of the bullying that Trump and his misguided militia friends have thrust upon us.

You want to call yourself a patriot, then this is the demon you should be worried about. If not then you are one more Putin patsy.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

Which party sill protect your civil liberties and inalienable rights. .?

The question is none of the above.

It’s time to water the tree of liberty.

researcher
Guest
researcher
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

I agree in general. The Democrats who currently control the party are little different than the Republicans when it comes to maintaining the cash flow for themselves and the rich and powerful. Then there are the Progressives and what being a Progressive is all about, returning government to the people, for the people, by the people. And of course there are also Progressives that do it only to be tied to the horse that wins, just like corrupt politicians from the two main parties. But real Progressives are trying to steer the country into actually living up to it’s ideals, and hopefully one day we will have a three party system. Democrats, Republicans and Progressives.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

It’s really hard to believe liberals are so unaware that they too are subject to swallowing disinformation from Russia but , like Lewis Carrol put in Alice in Wonderland, they practise believing impossible things regularly.

rollin
Guest
rollin
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

“Trump is in Putin’s pocket”

Welcome to October 2020. Perhaps you should change your name to non-researcher.

https://nypost.com/2020/09/25/at-last-fbis-reckless-bungling-of-russia-probe-exposed/

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  rollin

Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on Tuesday declassified two documents showing President Obama’s CIA feared in summer 2016 that Hillary Clinton was “stirring up” a false Russia collusion narrative to “vilify” Donald Trump and distract from her own controversies heading into the election.

The memos indicate the CIA first received the information through the monitoring of Russian sources and deemed it credible enough to brief Obama on it in July 2016 and to refer the intelligence to the FBI in September 2016 for possible investigation.

The warnings came as the FBI was just starting its Crossfire Hurricane probe into now-disproven Trump-Russia collusion, aided by the Clinton campaign-funded dossier by Christopher Steele. They are likely to bolster GOP claims the James Comey’s FBI ignored clear evidence that the allegations were a political dirty trick and not evidence of a counterintelligence threat.

“Per FBI verbal request, CIA provides the below examples of information the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE fusion cell has gleaned to date,” the September 2016 referral from the Agency to the bureau read. “An exchange [redacted] discussing US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning US presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering US elections as a means of distracting the public form her use of a private email server.”
File
ENCLOSURE_2__DCIA_Memo_09-07-16__U.pdf

Two months earlier, then-CIA Director John Brennan briefed Obama, according to handwritten notes written after the briefing.

“We’re getting additional insight into Russian activities from [redacted],” Brennan notes read. “CITE alleged approved by Hillary Clinton a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.”
File
ENCLOSURE_1__Brennan_Notes__U.pdf

more

https://justthenews.com/government/us-intel-declassify-more-evidence-showing-why-fbi-russia-probe-was-broken-start

also….

Declassified CIA memo one of several red flags Russia collusion was a Clinton dirty trick

U.S. intelligence officials say newly declassified CIA referral on Russian intercept just one of several red flares spies sent the FBI on Russia collusion narrative.

Between July 2016 and May 2017, the CIA repeatedly warned the FBI that the Russia collusion narrative spun by Christopher Steele’s dossier was a combination of political dirty trick by Team Clinton and targeted Russian disinformation.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/fbi-didnt-need-cia-warn-about-clintons-russia-dirty

And much more to come.

Angela Robinson
Guest
Angela Robinson
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

““CITE alleged approved by Hillary Clinton”…

First “alleged”.

Second, wow, Clinton approved something 4 years after she quit working in the State department! That’s amazing!

Also, Ratcliffe, when trump first nominated him for DNI? Republican Senators even balked at his nomination, for a variety of reasons, including politicizing the position and having no experience as well as fluffing his CV. Trump withdrew the nom…and then some months later did it again and the Senate caved.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago

Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_

BREAKING: Joe Biden is the subject of an active federal criminal investigation into his role in the counterintelligence investigation directed @ the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, incl the former vice president’s activities in Ukraine.
Ukrainian witnesses are cooperating
10:55 AM · Oct 7, 2020

Angela did you see Brennan on Jake Clapper, looked like he crapped his pants, long faces at CNN.

Angela Robinson
Guest
Angela Robinson
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Like one of his commenters asked, “What is the source for this”?

Because I checked all the news feeds and nothing comes up, well, except for things like:

“Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden” (Hunter that is). But that was a couple of weeks ago.

Sperry is far from unbiased.

Here is Trump’s tweet in it’s all caps glory:

“DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS, THE BIGGEST OF ALL POLITICAL SCANDALS (IN HISTORY)!!! BIDEN, OBAMA AND CROOKED HILLARY LED THIS TREASONOUS PLOT!!! BIDEN SHOULDN’T BE ALLOWED TO RUN – GOT CAUGHT!!!”

It’s like the drugs are affecting him so much he thinks it’s 2016.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago

Hot Coffee always reports broken news.

😂😂

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

TRB always puts up straw man attacks.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago

Even the folks watching telemundo aren’t buying the socialist crap….

Telemundo Deletes Twitter Poll following VP Debate After Kamala Gets CRUSHED by Pence 74% to 26%

It was very clear last night that Democrat Kamala Harris got crushed by Vice President Mike Pence in the vice presidential debate.

This was despite the liberal moderator and the slanted questions that were all in her favor.
The difference was Kamala Harris was forced by Pence to explain to the American public the Democrat Party’s true intentions and plans for the country.
Less freedom, more job loss, more government control, stacking the courts, trillions in lost revenue and millions of lost jobs.

Following the debate Telemundo News posted a poll on Decision 2020 — “Who won the debate?”

Pence mopped the floor with Kamala winning 76% to 24%.

This was too much for the hacks at Telemundo so they deleted the poll.
It’s gone.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

A Twitter poll… How scientific.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago

Angela,

Speaking of Drugs…What drugs is Biden taking, in the interest of transparency, you know like they demand from Trump….I’m sure Hunter could help out…justa little coke to get pops started for the last debate? Is that why he keeps wiping his nose?

And now the debate commission wants to plays games on the last debate and let Biden hide behind his computer. Cute!

Angela Robinson
Guest
Angela Robinson
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

You are so obsessed with Hunter, I mean clinically so.

I have no problem with Biden releahing his health reports, including medication, if any. Particularly if he is elected.

He does, btw, take Crestor for lipids in his blood, and the OTC Nexium for acid reflux.

If he has had odd visits to WR, and then come down with Covid, before the election, then certainly he should. Oddly, he hasn’t had to be hospitalized. Or demand NDAs from any hospital staff treating him.

Oh, while I am here, the drug Trump is pushing, from Regeneron? It was created using the kidney tissue of an aborted fetus. I eagerly await the “pro-life” community’s condemnation of the “miracle” drug.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Even Trump’s own former National Security Advisor knows he’s Putin’s man in Washington.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/trumps-former-national-security-adviser-accused-him-of-treasonous-conduct-and-no-one-cared/

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Geist

You are not impartial.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

I didn’t write the article or make the statements, [edit].

Angela Robinson
Guest
Angela Robinson
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

Well, pot, kettle all that, though I had no idea that Geist is General H.R. McMaster.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Geist

He’s also said he never heard the President denigrate the military, which certainly was not covered in the same press that gleefully makes much use of him now. He’s on a publicity tour to push his new book in which he takes every president from Johnson to Obama to task for not understanding foreign policy as he does. https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/6/gen-hr-mcmaster-on-the-urgent-need-for-strategic-c/

What he really said was that Trump is refusing to publicly attack the Russian propaganda machine because he “believes “that if he confronts Putin directly, you know,” he will “inadvertently draw his own election into question.” He also says no one can know if Russia actually did influence American voters. It’s perfectly clear that Trump is right in his belief because- tah tah- even people on this comments section make much noise about how “he’s in Putin’s pocket.”, Trump was and is relentlessly abused over this thing that McMaster says no one can know for sure and that’s with no proof at all that Trump is.

Though the fact that Putin can send American Liberals into a frenzy at any point he wants is proof it’s the liberals and their majority press that is under the Russian thumb. They have their usual two faced accusations going on that Trump’s actions to stop the Chinese political disinformation and manipulation is called racist while his reluctance- which the liberals created with their over-the-top spew- to do the same with Russia is also racist. How stupid can they get…

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Geist

Sad…..I remember Mother Jones before it became toilet paper.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Mother Jones didn’t say it, General McMasters did.

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago

2 months ,no cases at FUHS , no way it was here in November.

R David Franceschi
Guest
3 years ago

Oh No!!! 2 More cases. Woo Hoo Flu is gonna get ya. Better buy a Bubble Suit. Shelter in Place, Social Distancing, Facial Coverings, No Public Restrooms and what do you get…BULLSHIT.

researcher
Guest
researcher
3 years ago

Looks like I’m not the only one who thinks Trump’s illness may have been made up to boost his campaign. This is a quote from a Salon interview with Bandy X. Lee, a well known and respected forensic psychiatrist at Yale School of Medicine and teacher at Yale Law School.

“Were you surprised by how Trump’s medical doctors dodged and obfuscated, as well as made false claims about the president’s health amid his hospitalization?”

“Not at all, and I am still not ruling out malingering, or feigning illness. When deciphering these things, we look for medical inconsistencies, secondary gain and psychological disposition. There are already too many inconsistencies in the medical picture, and look at the enormous secondary gain. We know that he needed something to reset his campaign, with everything going badly for him and his debate performance being unable to reverse the polls — and he was instantly able to stifle most criticism. We also know that he would manipulate any situation, and that we are vulnerable.”

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

Reminds me of the national inquirer. People will believe anything.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  researcher

Researcher,

Try to stay away from Conspiracy theories like this.

Your best when citing evidence.

The evidence and Dr. Fauci agree that the Trump/Covid story is real.

Look how many are testing positive around the White House.

More new cases in the White Houde than many Countries had in a day…

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

You have absolutely no credentials as an arbiter on the truth.

You seek to reinforce the mainstream media talking points.

You are “AGI-Prop”.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Good luck Kym. I don’t mean any Ill will towards you. It’s been a crushing year and it’s so hard to see the ones we love get their ticket punch. You are trying your best, as we all are to educate our friends , family, and community.

Yes, I’m angry at the health choices of our collective society, and corrupting the children with crap food, music, and media.

Deep breaths. ….

I do wish you better health, because your a mom, and your family really needs you to stay around for a long time.

I lost both parents this year, so, please reconsider your choices…I miss those people who brought me here, and I don’t want to perpetuate suffering.😢

Lord knows there’s too much already.

PW

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

Trump sees contracting Covid as a weakness, he would have been much happier to bestow that on Biden. That’s why he’s out so soon. Interesting that maybe getting Covid might boost trumps ratings. I feel the big test will be in a few days when the remdesivir, and all the other pharmaceuticals wear off. Did you see his chest heaving and wheezing when he was standing on the balcony? Can’t fake that.

Willie Bray
Guest
3 years ago

🕯🌳Welcome everyone to the Jerry Springer show are guests today are commenter’s on the RHBB blog take it away commenter’s.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago

Here are some plain, nonhysterical facts: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control is a bloated federal government agency with a long history of incompetence, fraud, secrecy, mission creep and shady alliances with both social justice causes on the left and private corporations on the big business right. The “deep state” of entrenched bureaucrats embedded in the Beltway bowels is alive and thriving at the CDC. The unelected elites who’ve occupied top offices at the public health-industrial complex are hostile to public scrutiny while clamoring for ever-ballooning budgets. Their recommendations have often been detrimental to citizens’ well-being and freedom.

And, yes, many of the scientists who work there are rabidly anti-conservative and anti-Trump.

It’s a brazen lie that President Donald Trump “slashed” CDC funding, which is being used as an excuse for the agency’s coronavirus unpreparedness. Cognitively impaired and truth-challenged Joe Biden made the claim during last week’s Democratic debate that these purported “Draconian cuts” put Americans at risk. But Trump’s budget proposal to cut some sliver of CDC fat has never been enacted, and Congress increased funding, instead.

At nearly $7 billion, CDC’s annual budget is more than 200% larger than it was two decades ago. On top of that, a shady big business lobbying group called Corporate Friends of CDC has raised hundreds of millions of supplemental dollars — which raises serious conflict-of-interest issues. In 2007, Sen. Tom Coburn’s fiscal audit of the agency discovered vulgar expenditures including CDC syphilis prevention funds spent to host a “safe-sex” event with a porn star, CDC HIV/AIDS prevention funds spent on a transgender beauty pageant, and $45 million in CDC funding spent on conferences featuring prostitutes, protests and beach parties.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/03/11/cdc_centers_for_damaged_credibility_142622.html

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Will you accept the results of the election when Trump loses?

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

If Trump loses what ya going to do when they come for you?
Think about it.

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Are you implying there is a threat to my safety or freedom if Trump loses?

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

There’s a lot of threats to this country. Two biggest are the democratic socialist party and RINOs.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

White Supremacy is the biggest threat.

According to more reputable and professional people than you, like the State Dept. and FBI, and BLM.

Socialism isn’t on the radar kid.

Al Qaeda will get you before socialism will.

If we counted the lies you post each day, how many would it be?

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Lies? ” “You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means” was said by the swordsman Inigo Montoya in the 1987 romantic comedy The Princess Bride.

Definition of a lie by Merriam-Webster
“1a : an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker or writer to be untrue with intent to deceive
He told a lie to avoid punishment.”

You conflate an intent to deceive with a difference of opinion. And I think you do so with the intent to lie.

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

P[edit] W[edit], I wasn’t talking to you. I want to know what it is that hot coffee is talking about. Who is “they” and why are they coming for me?

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

Welcome to serfdom. You may own the land but “they” will control it. You take the money, “they” own you.

They, anyone supporting the globalist agenda, such as Biden/ Harris, AOC etc.

But I guess you can’t see what just happened with land and property control with the Gavin / Huffman pot licensing.
How many agencies are now up your butt with there hand out ready to grab your money and watching your property in case they find something they can fine you for?

Control addicts…much like you.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Trump owes waaaay to much money to foreigners not to be considered a gLoBaLiSt.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Geist

You mean globalist are bought by the richest? Wow What a reason to not trust globalist.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago

Regionalism – The Blueprint for Your Serfdom

https://globalizationofcalifornia.com/regionalism-the-blueprint-for-your-serfdom/

and

How Congressman Mike Thompson (D – St. Helena), Senator Barbara Boxer (D) and Senator Diane Feinstein (D) are responsible for the actions taken to remove people from their homes, close down private recreational sites and close off public lands to any type of transportation except your feet.

They committed these acts when they all colluded to pass The Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act (S. 738) (HR 1501) which would permanently preserve 300,000 acres along California’s northern coast as wilderness.

The Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act was introduced in March 2004. The latest major action with this bill occurred on July 21, 2004 when the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests held hearings.

The BLM Lands within the BRBNA (Blue Ridge Berryessa Natural Area) that are proposed for wilderness designation under this bill include:

more

http://www.socminco.com/WILDLANDS-PROJECT.htm

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Seriously? More Agenda 21 version 16, 2030 horse crap?

An August 2020 report by the U.S. State Department Global Engagement Center stated that Global Research is, by a significant margin, the most accessed proxy website allied with the pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Your investigative credentials are lacking.

You are establishment.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

If establishment to you means fact checking, than yes I am.

And I’m happy to oblige Kym while you call her fat.

Good day, Lies.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

By the time you finish with you pathetic research and complaints the only truth teller left on earth will of course be you….In your opinion.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

You people were saying the same shit about Obama, none of your fevered nightmare scenarios ever seemed to come to pass.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago

Hmm, didn’t this area just burn up? If you can’t get fire insurance would you rebuild?

LAKE BERRYESSA

Expiration of the existing contracts presents the opportunity to implement government policy prohibiting exclusive use of public recreation land and to broaden the range of interests served by including more nature-based recreation. (Appendix D BRBNA Lands by Ownership Page D2)

From Range Magazine quoting property owners around BRBNA:

There are others at that big square of tables who are also property owners—ranchers, orchard growers, local equipment operators, No one, Krauss insists, who need have any worry about the BRBNA. Yet, at the big table they are not considered property owners as much as they are “stakeholders” just like the students, the environmentalists, the tribe, and the federal-land representatives who have an equal place in the discussion.

It is difficult to get a full grasp of the BRBNA, like reaching for a handful of foam. The group is guided by five principal objectives, including preservation of regional natural and cultural values, support of “sustainable” economic development, respect of landowner’s rights and encouragement of non-growth recreation on public lands.

It is the fifth of those “principal objectives” that bothers Vicki. “Consider all positions on an Issue but only support those where the partnership has reached consensus”

That word consensus again. No vote counting, no majority, but a degree of peer pressure that works best when everybody gets around a big table and agrees they love the place enough to show it. Enough, Vicki fears, to create an “Agriculture Park” spread over private and public lands under the umbrella of an unelected consensus.

“What that would do is simply encumber farms and ranches, maybe not into a park, but a virtual park where we would own the land, but be told what we can do on it and with it” Vicki says. “That’s serfdom, and it erases property rights.”

AGENDA 21

In 1992, the IUCN authored Agenda 21 adopted in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil at the UN Earth Summit Conference on Environment and Development. Agenda 21 is an official policy list designed to reorganize societies around environmental priorities utilizing local government for implementation via ordinances. The US is signatory to this international treaty with over 100 other countries.

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago

Hot Coffee, why don’t you follow up with the truth when you get tricked and try to convince others of the same scam you’ve been duped into believing? I’m sure you saw this, as it’s from fox news and addresses an intentional hoax and manufactured, fake news story you posted the other day.

Is fox news outing a story as false enough for you?

Will you admit you were wrong? Will you delete the link to the false story you posted? Will you be more responsible in the future?

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

Sorry, just a fox affiliate, not actually fox news…

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

I’ll wait and see exactly who Jamal turns out to be….

Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher won’t tell the public what Omar Jamal does for his office.
Omar Jamal and Bob Fletcher have a professional relationship that dates back nearly a decade. After Omar Jamal alleged voter fraud to a right-wing media outfit, the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office claimed he was speaking for himself.
by Joey Peters October 6, 2020
Project Veritas has partnered with Omar Jamal, a man of questionable reputation in the Somali community to allege “ballot harvesting fraud” in Minnesota. Credit: Screenshot via Project Veritas’ YouTube page.

Omar Jamal, the main source for a controversial and questionable pair of videos alleging voter fraud in Minnesota, works for the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office. But what does that work involve? That question has proved hard to figure out.

Omar Jamal’s exact role, job description, and salary remain unknown. And the Sheriff’s Office won’t disclose this information, despite Omar Jamal being on the public payroll. What is known is that Omar Jamal works in the office as a civilian employee, meaning he’s not a law enforcement officer, according to a media statement last week attributed to David Metusalem, chief deputy with the office.

Last week, Project Veritas, which media researchers at Harvard University have labeled a “right-wing disinformation outfit,” released two videos featuring Omar Jamal. On camera, he alleges that Congresswoman Ilhan Omar orchestrated an illegal ballot harvesting operation in Minneapolis. At that time, a spokesman for the Sheriff’s Office sent reporters a prepared statement distancing itself from the videos.

“In regards to the voter fraud media investigation and allegation, Mr. Jamal was not acting as an employee of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office,” the statement read. “Any direct implication would be a violation of department policies.”

In the Project Veritas video, Omar Jamal also identified himself as “part of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office.”

Since then, Sahan Journal has sent multiple emails and left multiple voicemails with Roy Magnuson, the Sheriff’s Office’s spokesperson, asking for Omar Jamal’s job title, job duties, salary, and length of employment. Magnuson has not responded to these questions.

On October 1, we filed a request with the office under the Minnesota Data Practices Act—the state’s public records law—seeking the information. As of press time almost one week later, we still haven’t heard back, other than an acknowledgement from the office that it received Sahan Journal’s request and “will begin to review the request for appropriate processing.”

Reached by phone Tuesday morning, Omar Jamal did not respond to a reporter’s question about his job duties at the Sheriff’s Office, before hanging up on the call.
Omar Jamal continues to make appearances with Sheriff Fletcher

https://sahanjournal.com/news/omar-jamal-sheriff-bob-fletcher/

Right now it sounds like Omar is a griffter that will take any cash he can get his hands on.

From the Sheriff’s dept
Project Veritas, and
Illan

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

It’s almost like Project Veritas intends to make satire out of the people who believe them at this point. Let’s see what pretzel like contortions we can get the Trumpsters to do this week.

Some people in general would just never admit to being wrong about anything in life. It’s even more annoying when those people are gullible enough to believe just about anything or are not literate enough to spot bad actors who masquerade as journalists.

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

She just gave you links to the Agenda 21 regional issues for the Napa Valley, and you switch to something else like you really don’t care about the actual documents pertaining to an agenda to remove the public access to land.

If you wanted to have a conversation you would assume that HC is correct in her asserting that there is much more than meets the eye.

The whole system is bait and switch.

That’s why the rich get richer by understanding how wealth is generated.

I think we can at least agree that shutting down the economic engine of this country is controlled by a small group of people on positions of power.

Who benefits?

For real….?

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

P[edit] W[edit], I would never click any link that either of you post and i usually only read the first and last 500 words of these diatribes. I think it’s only fair to ask someone to set the record straight when something they post has been discredited. That would be an ongoing effort for some.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

Omar Jamal seems like he just might be playing everyone, for cash of course…and your OK with that as long as you can find me wrong?

Strange priorities you have Bong.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago

More on the conspiracy….

WASHINGTON POST STAFF WRITER – FRIDAY, JUNE 24, 2005

The Supreme Court ruled yesterday that local governments may force property owners to sell out and make way for private economic development when officials decide it would benefit the public, even if the property is not blighted and the new project’s success is not guaranteed.

The 5 to 4 ruling provided the strong affirmation that state and local governments had sought for their increasing use of eminent domain for urban revitalization, especially in the Northeast, where many city centers have decayed and the suburban land supply is dwindling.

Opponents, including property-rights activists and advocates for elderly and low-income urban residents, argued that forcibly shifting land from one private owner to another, even with fair compensation, violates the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits the taking of property by government except for “public use.”

Welcome to serfdom. You may own the land but “they” will control it. You take the money, “they” own you.

So one can see why natural resources will be in short supply. When 50% of the United States is designated “Wilderness” no access will be allowed even to harvest “natural resources”. Shortages are being engineered strictly to control human activity and they are using a bogus reason “climate change” as a tool to entice folks to accept this tyranny.

WILD FIRES & ADA

In a report from the National Parks Association addressing the ADA and Americans’ with disabilities it said; – non motorized wheel chairs were acceptable in Wilderness Areas but there would not be any special access provided.

In the case of wild fires the Park Service would only allow motorized fire suppression equipment into fight a fire if private property or life was under imminent threat. Otherwise suppression would be done by aircraft or on foot.

CALIFORNIA FOOTHILLS LEGACY AREA

more

http://www.socminco.com/WILDLANDS-PROJECT.htm

P*** W***lies
Guest
P*** W***lies
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Thank you Cafe Caliente!

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

I noticed Pequeno Frito isn’t saying much to you these days.

Free estimates
Guest
Free estimates
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Por qué no se llama el Frito Pequeño, El Brian Real? Has olvidado su español? No me digas…

Bongholio
Guest
Bongholio
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Wait a minute…are hot coffee and poop waffles the same person?

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

No, but I’ve busted 2 full time professional trolls working this site together quietly, before.

Agenda 21 nutjob Rosa Koire and Chemtrail farter Dane Wigington used to fuck with Kym’s readers all day.

Just so similar to Hot Coffee and Liar Daddy.

I think they are still here, Kym does not agree.

The upside is we can insult those 2 all day long, because they are public morons and “not” commentors here.

They are cons, nuts and failed at most all things.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

TRB

Does your fantasy of being the RRBB full time troll cop hunting your imaginary nemesis Sid make you feel important?

Do you hide in your basement all day building your Sid detector?

Oh well I guess it beats facing reality….they claim ignorance is bliss.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Bongholio

Bong,
Wait are you, Geist, and TRB the same person?

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  P*** W***lies

Welcome PW,

I’m at least looking for the truth.
Once in a while I screw up but I’m not sticking my head in the sand Like some folks here.

Geist
Guest
Geist
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

The Infowars copypasta bullshit parade is intensifying…