Tiger at Bronx Zoo Tests Positive for COVID-19, Other Cats Have Symptoms

Tiger World Wildlife Society

Image of a tiger accompanying the World Wildlife press release. Presumably it is Nadia but that hasn’t been confirmed.

The following information was released today by the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Bronx Zoo

Nadia, a 4-year-old female Malayan tiger at the Bronx Zoo, has tested positive for COVID-19. She, her sister Azul, two Amur tigers, and three African lions had developed a dry cough and all are expected to recover.

This positive COVID-19 test for the tiger was confirmed by USDA’s National Veterinary Services Laboratory, based in Ames, Iowa.

We tested the cat out of an abundance of caution and will ensure any knowledge we gain about COVID-19 will contribute to the world’s continuing understanding of this novel coronavirus.

Though they have experienced some decrease in appetite, the cats at the Bronx Zoo are otherwise doing well under veterinary care and are bright, alert, and interactive with their keepers. It is not known how this disease will develop in big cats since different species can react differently to novel infections, but we will continue to monitor them closely and anticipate full recoveries.

The four affected tigers live in the zoo’s Tiger Mountain exhibit. One male Amur tiger that also lives at Tiger Mountain has not exhibited any clinical signs, and a Malayan tiger and two Amur tigers at the zoo’s Wild Asia exhibit have also not exhibited any clinical signs.

None of the zoo’s snow leopards, cheetahs, clouded leopard, Amur leopard, puma or serval are showing any signs of illness. Our cats were infected by a person caring for them who was asymptomatically infected with the virus or before that person developed symptoms. Appropriate preventive measures are now in place for all staff who are caring for them, and the other cats in our four WCS zoos, to prevent further exposure of any other of our zoo cats.

We are grateful for the cooperation and support of the New York State Diagnostic Laboratory at Cornell University and the University of Illinois College of Veterinary Medicine Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, where the initial COVID-19 testing of samples from the tiger were performed; the USDA National Veterinary Services Laboratory where confirmatory testing was conducted; USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; and the New York and Illinois State Veterinarians and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for their assistance.

COVID-19 is a disease caused by the coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2. It is believed that the virus was first transferred to people at a food market that trades in wildlife in Wuhan, China. There is no evidence that animals play a role in the transmission of COVID-19 to people other than the initial event in the Wuhan market, and no evidence that any person has been infected with COVID-19 in the US by animals, including by pet dogs or cats.

We will issue additional information as warranted. Our four zoos and aquarium have been temporarily closed since March 16.

Press release from the USDA:

The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories has confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 in humans) in one tiger at a zoo in New York. This is the first instance of a tiger being infected with COVID-19. Samples from this tiger were taken and tested after several lions and tigers at the zoo showed symptoms of respiratory illness.

Public health officials believe these large cats became sick after being exposed to a zoo employee who was actively shedding virus. The zoo has been closed to the public since mid-March, and the first tiger began showing signs of sickness on March 27. All of these large cats are expected to recover. There is no evidence that other animals in other areas of the zoo are showing symptoms.

USDA and CDC are monitoring the situation and working to support the state and local health departments and state animal health officials. State animal and public health officials will take the lead in making determinations about whether animals, either at this zoo or in other areas, should be tested for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. USDA will notify the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) of this finding.

Anyone sick with COVID-19 should restrict contact with animals, out of an abundance of caution including pets, during their illness, just as they would with other people. Although there have not been reports of pets becoming sick with COVID-19 in the United States, it is still recommended that people sick with COVID-19 limit contact with animals until more information is known about the virus. If a sick person must care for a pet or be around animals, they should wash their hands before and after the interaction.

Questions and Answers:

Can people give this virus to animals and, if so, what animals are at risk?

This is the first case of its kind. We are still learning about this new coronavirus and how it spreads. This case suggests that a zoo employee spread the virus to the tiger. Further studies are needed to understand if and how different animals could be affected by COVID-19. State animal and public health officials will continue to work closely with USDA and CDC to monitor this situation and will conduct additional testing if it is warranted.

If multiple animals were showing symptoms, why was only one tested?

Only one tiger was tested as the collection of diagnostic samples in big cats requires general anesthesia. Since all tigers and lions were exhibiting similar respiratory symptoms, the attending veterinarian felt it was in the best interest of the animals to limit the potential risks of general anesthesia to one tiger for diagnostics.

If animals can catch the virus, can they give it back to people?

At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that any animals, including pets or livestock, can spread COVID-19 infection to people.

Will this finding prompt additional testing of animals?

No. This is an evolving situation, however, routine testing of zoo or personal animals is not recommended at this time. Public and animal health officials may decide to test certain animals that are showing signs of illness and that are known to have been exposed to the virus. More information about how those decisions will be made is available here: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/one_health/downloads/faq-public-on-companion-animal-testing.pdf

Should any animal showing signs of respiratory illness be tested?

USDA and CDC do not recommend routine testing of animals for this virus. Because the situation is ever-evolving, public and animal health officials may decide to test certain animals out of an abundance of caution. The decision to test will be made collaboratively between local, state or federal public and animal health officials.

Should I avoid contact with pets or other animals if I am sick from coronavirus (COVID-19)?

You should restrict contact with pets and other animals while you are sick with COVID-19, just like you would with other people. Although there have not been reports of pets becoming sick with COVID-19 in the United States, it is still recommended that people sick with COVID-19 limit contact with animals until more information is known about the virus. When possible, have another member of your household care for your animals while you are sick. If you are sick with COVID-19, avoid contact with your pet, including petting, snuggling, being kissed or licked, and sharing food. If you must care for your pet or be around animals while you are sick, wash your hands before and after you interact with pets. More information is available on how to keep people and animals safe at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/animals.html.

What should I do if I think my animal has the virus?

Call your veterinary clinic with any questions about your animal’s health. In order to ensure the veterinary clinic is prepared for the household animal, the owner should call ahead and arrange the hospital or clinic visit. Make sure to tell your veterinarian if your animal was exposed a person sick with COVID-19, and if your animal is showing any signs of illness. Veterinarians who believe an animal should be tested will contact state animal health officials, who will work with public and animal health authorities to decide whether samples should be collected and tested.

Could this affect tigers or other animals at other zoos across the United States?

There is no evidence of this virus affecting animals at any other facilities in the United States. However, anyone sick with COVID-19 should restrict contact with animals, including pets, during their illness, just as they would with other people. Although there have not been reports of pets becoming sick with COVID-19 in the United States, it is still recommended that people sick with COVID-19 limit contact with animals until more information is known about the virus. If a sick person must care for a pet or be around animals, they should wash their hands before and after the interaction.

###

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Here or there?
Guest
Here or there?
4 years ago

Wonder if our cattle will get it and start prompting usda to test our food for the covid19?

Bug on a Windshield
Guest
Bug on a Windshield
4 years ago
Reply to  Here or there?

Like Mad-Cow.

The Real Brian
Guest
The Real Brian
4 years ago

Great coverage of a very interesting news piece of the day.

Great job Kym, thanks. You saved me some reseaerch time with the multiple angles you provided.

Mike
Guest
Mike
4 years ago

I tell you whose fault this is, Carole Baskins

Clyde
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Hear! Hear! I second the motion!

Sparklemahn
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Carole Baskin is an American animal rights activist and owner of Big Cat Rescue, a non-profit animal sanctuary based near Tampa, Florida. So it figures the peabrains don’t like what she’s doing.

HOJ in Training
Guest
HOJ in Training
4 years ago
Reply to  Sparklemahn

Tiger Joe Exotic created this music video that suggests Carole Baskin killed her husband and then fed him to her tigers.

After watching the Netflix series, I see no reason to not believe him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCgz9915wHw

By the way, the actress in the video reminds me of Divine from Pink Flamingos.

Pike Mortar
Guest
Pike Mortar
4 years ago

Joe Exotic’s tigers were all Covid free.

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
4 years ago
Reply to  Pike Mortar

Yeah, but those cats had meth mouth.

researcher
Guest
researcher
4 years ago

“Although there have not been reports of pets becoming sick with COVID-19 in the United States”

There have been pet cats that have contracted the disease overseas.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/cats-animals-pets-coronavirus-covid19
“A cat in Belgium seems to have become infected with the coronavirus and may have had COVID-19, the disease that the virus causes.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00984-8
“Cats can be infected with the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, and can spread it to other cats, but dogs are not really susceptible to the infection, say researchers in China.”

Dogs can catch it too

livescience.com/coronavirus-first-case-human-to-dog-transmission.html
“A pet dog that contracted a “low-level” COVID-19 infection from its owner has now died, according to news reports. The owner has not allowed the dog to be autopsied, so the exact cause of death remains unknown.”

Willie Bray
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  researcher

🕯🌳A dog in Hong Kong had it and died near the beginning of February. 🕯🐸🖖

yeahbutt
Guest
yeahbutt
4 years ago
Reply to  Willie Bray

it was 17 years old

Willie Bray
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  yeahbutt

🕯🌳But it still caught it and died. First case of animal virus. 🕯🖖🐸

Ragnar44
Guest
Ragnar44
4 years ago

No evidence? Bullshit. They just haven’t proven it yet.
The blatant worship of “Authority” during this crisis is fucking disgusting.
Oh, New York Times? The toilet paper of record.

researcher
Guest
researcher
4 years ago
Reply to  Ragnar44

I laughed at that too, “At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that any animals, including pets or livestock, can spread COVID-19 infection to people.” Of course there’s no evidence since we are only just learning about this disease now and no one has done any research into whether or not any animal, that can get the virus from a human, can give it back.

I’m kinda thinkin it can.

tax payer
Guest
tax payer
4 years ago
Reply to  researcher

but they said….

Elizabeth
Guest
Elizabeth
4 years ago
Reply to  researcher

That’s the same thing they say about whether or not 5g has a negative effect on the health of humans, it’s too soon to tell there hasn’t been enough evidence yet. We’re all jus ginuea pigs for their experiments.

McUghtred
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Ragnar44

Aye, Ragnaar… bullshit indeed!

Sparklemahn
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Ragnar44

IF the NY Times is toilet paper, Fox FAKE news for dummies is the crap you wipe off with it.

Cats, but no dogs.............yet
Guest
Cats, but no dogs.............yet
4 years ago

Source Science News

A cat in Belgium seems to have become infected with the coronavirus and may have had COVID-19, the disease that the virus causes. While the case — the first reported in cats — suggests that the animals can catch the virus, there is no evidence that felines play a role in spreading the coronavirus, and it’s still unclear how susceptible they are to the disease.

“This is an isolated case, so it is not the rule,” microbiologist Emmanuel André of KU Leuven said March 27 at a news conference held by Belgium’s public health institute.

The cat probably picked up the virus, called SARS-CoV-2, from its owner, who fell ill with COVID-19 after traveling to northern Italy. About a week later, the cat started to show signs of illness: respiratory issues, nausea and diarrhea. In lab tests, feces and vomit samples showed high levels of SARS-CoV-2’s genetic material.

But that positive result comes with caveats. The samples were collected and sent to the lab by the owner, and a veterinarian has yet to examine the cat. The cat recovered after nine days, and once it’s released from quarantine, researchers will run a blood test for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which would provide more concrete proof of an infection. Those results are expected in about a week.

Even if the cat tests positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, it might be hard to definitively prove that the virus made the cat sick — lots of other pathogens cause respiratory and stomach issues in cats.

The American Veterinary Medical Association recommends taking normal precautions when cleaning litter boxes and feeding animals. If owners test positive for COVID-19, they should consider having someone else in the household care for the pet while they’re sick or wear a mask around the pet and limit contact. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has similar recommendations.

Willie Bray
Guest
4 years ago

🕯🌳I don’t think you can really blame the specialist in this, there first priority is human lifes. Yes you’d liked to know if it’s another avenue for the virus but they always look at the human one first. 🕯🖖🐸

Lynn H
Guest
Lynn H
4 years ago

Wow. That’s not good.

Makes one wonder if cats are the intermediary animal.

Thanks Kym.

Willie Bray
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

🕯🌳Pangolins are an alternative source for they same reason they take the Rhino’s horns. There all over Laos,Cambodia, Vietnam and that region. 🕯🐸🖖

Lynn H
Guest
Lynn H
4 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Kym, they’re actually not quite sure about the pangolins. They’re still looking for the intermediary virus link and it’s host. The pangolin virus is just the closest they’ve found so far, and I think they hyped it a bit for pangolins benefit as they’re so endangered and trafficked.

It looks like cats and ferrets can catch it more easily, but not dogs, pigs or ducks. I take studies that come out of China right now with a grain of salt, but the cats in this zoo are something else. A Chinese study found 14% of cats in Wuhan were infected. IDK. But if they are, and if all these big cats are… IDK, doesn’t look good. Cats systems are not very much like ours.

DivideByZero
Guest
DivideByZero
4 years ago
Reply to  Lynn H

The operative words are contained in the first sentence, and they are “seems” and “may”.

FanOfGuest
Guest
FanOfGuest
4 years ago

This is really a no brainer. Of course corona virus’s can be transmitted between animals and humans! This has been going on for the last 15 years. First it was chickens, than swine, why not cats n dogs?

Spewydog
Guest
Spewydog
4 years ago
Reply to  FanOfGuest

Actually going back thousands of years!!!

soapboxer
Guest
soapboxer
4 years ago
Reply to  FanOfGuest

Actually it’s not a no-brainer it’s something you should think very carefully about. remember the stories of the plague they killed all the cats because they thought they were the ones but it was actually the fleas on the rats and they killed the cats that were killing the rats and keeping the population down. I heard a few months ago in some country I think it was Russia we’re shooting cats and dogs because of fear of Corona virus infections. please be careful with what you think is true or not because it would be awful to have a situation here where people started killing cats and dogs randomly out of fear I believe that happened from some avian flu problem a while back where they were wholesale shooting ravens and crows in the Midwest I am too tired to look up the details and I might be mistaken on the details correct me if I’m wrong but please think about these things before you react especially when it comes to violence towards others animals people etcetera take care everyone.

Sparklemahn
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  soapboxer

It’s a no-brainer to the peabrains!

Dan
Guest
Dan
4 years ago
Reply to  FanOfGuest

“It’s all about the proteins, man”

WillMunny
Guest
4 years ago

Any man dont wanna get kilt, better head out on the back…

Joe exotic
Guest
Joe exotic
4 years ago

Definitely got it from that bitch Carole Baskin

Sparklemahn
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Joe exotic

F-ck zoos!

Xik
Guest
Xik
4 years ago

We can’t test all our people, but we can test a Tiger…yup makes sense

Xik
Guest
Xik
4 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Thank you for clarifying that Kim, was a little odd without that additional info you just provided.

Thank you for everything you do! awesome person you are indeed

Government Lies
Guest
Government Lies
4 years ago

Isnt the evidence that animals and pets can recieve and transmit this disease right here in the article, they even tell is to avoid our pets if we are ill and to wash our hands, this could be being transmitted by dogs and cats and nobody even knows! So funny how they slowly massage us before they drop the bomb, like oh, 14 day social distancing and lockdown just turned into 2-3 months, the powers that be are sneaky and secretive about what they do know, the government lies so people do not panic, they will not tell is the truth, only what they want us to know, social engineering, the government is not our friend or ally.

Earth critter
Guest
Earth critter
4 years ago

Simple Zoonotics: transfer of dis-ease between man and animals has been going on for eternity. We are animals and part of this earth. We are no different even though our egos thinks we are…. we are all earth critters

Lady
Guest
Lady
4 years ago

I’ve been adding bbq sauce to all my animals food, trying to marinate them from the inside just in case the meat markets plummet and I’m unable to purchase any meats from the store. They’ll taste delicious i think.

Bug on a Windshield
Guest
Bug on a Windshield
4 years ago
Reply to  Lady

I’ve been adding bbq sauce to MY food in case I get, and die from, covid and my animals can’t get out of the house and to the pet food store. I’ll taste delicious I think.