Concerns About Terra-Gen Wind Turbine Project Expressed in Letter to the Editor

Welcome to our letters to the editor/opinion section. To submit yours for consideration, please send to [email protected]. Please consider including an image to be used–either a photograph of you or something applicable to the letter. However, an image is not necessary for publication.
Remember opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect that of Redheaded Blackbelt nor have we checked the letters for accuracy.

wind turbines

Wind Turbines [photo by Jeff Kubina from Columbia, Maryland via WikiCommons]

My name is Liv Barker, my husband is Garth Chojnowski, and as of April 1, 2019, we are purchasers of a house in Scotia. CA. We are not scientists, but environmentally concerned elder artists, as well as a veteran, who have made a huge investment in our new community, and are gravely concerned about the impending windmill Terra-Gen project on Bear and Monument Ridges in Humboldt County, CA.
  Though my husband has been a California resident for many years, my heritage for centuries is Appalachia, and I was at ground zero of the water poisoning that concerned the Kanawha River Valley in January of 2014. I have also watched my mountains ravaged by strip mining, seen the reports of illnesses associated with water shed poisoning from coal mines, and sobbed when my fellow Appalachians were killed from industrial negligence. My history of being impacted by industrial projects is valid.
  The Terra-Gen project analysis is greatly errored. We start with Terra-Gen themselves, who are a mega industrial conglomerate of venture capitalists who hired a company that works for oil concerns to assess the environmental impact of this project. They have a history of attempting projects like this in poorer communities, and losing to Native Americans who have had to fight the environmental impact (see 2011 Pahnamid Project). I suspect this is partially why Terra-Gen has put this project on the fast lane, pushing the approval through, despite the monumental lack of impact analysis on our lives, with a purposely confusing Environmental Impact Report that is so full of bewildering jargon the average reader cannot comprehend. There are also corporate tax incentives for them to build now and complete next year.
  Environmentally, there are several concerns. First, the virgin redwood timber cut to complete this project is massive; you could theoretically build approximately 12,000 new homes. The concrete pads poured are forever, thus the soil, ecosystem and water shed will be forever negatively impacted. Although this project boasts a decrease in greenhouse gases, the analysis is flawed because it does not mention the ONE MILLION gallons of diesel fuel that will be used to build 60 windmills, plus the oil used within the windmills for their 30 year life span. The 90’ trucks deployed to complete this mission will be making approximately 14,000 trips to the ridge through roads that will have to be widened at least triple their size, thus poisoning our air and forest with further emissions, not to mention accidents that will undoubtedly occur. Terra-Gen also is flawed in their analysis of our visual environment, as they claim that most of Humboldt will not see the project results, whereas the actual build is on a ridge famous for the spectacular distance views, not to mention the amount of lights that are going to flood this project at night, diminishing our clear night sky views we enjoy when the clouds allow us. These concerns will destroy what we all love about this County, while they take conspicuous useless action ostensibly to encourage support for what they deem our moral obligation to greenhouse gas decreases; let us destroy your environment or you are complicit in destroying the earth.
  All that I’ve mentioned so far is enough to halt this project, but the largest negative impact that we can see will be wind turbine noise (WTN) caused by the vibrations produced by these 60 windmills. There is very limited scientific data that exists on the association between noise from wind turbines and health, but there is some. Even though we are considered rural, thus this is why they boast that the impact will be minimal at best; they do not address the impact on vibrations on wildlife, soil, trees, and shed water. Life is not solitarily defined by the ability to speak English; they have ostensibly ignored that life is everything in our environment that thrives. We are all aware that our domesticated animals hear and feel on an entirely different level than humans, and wildlife is no exception. In a study published on March 13, 2019, it concluded that WTN is associated with an increase in sleep medication and antidepressants especially among the elderly, suggesting that long-term WTN may potentially be associated with sleep and mental health (https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp3909), and in another study, short term residential penetrating WTN at night was associated with an increase in myocardial infarction and stroke in the elderly (https://docs.wind-watch.org/wind-turbine-noise-cardiovascular-events.pdf). A 2013 review concluded that there is some evidence that infrasound (too low to hear) can affect the vestibular system (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23331380), and a study in 2014 concluded that exposure to WTN increased the risk of annoyance and self-reported sleep disturbances (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/health-effect-of-wind-turbines/). A 2015 review concluded there is some evidence that exposure to WTN and its negative impact on those around it warranted serious investigation (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/health-effect-of-wind-turbines/). The limitations on all of these studies are that most are observational. People who live near and suffer are not random, and there is no way to blind subjects to their proximity, thus making data elemental at best, but, this should not diminish the impact they are showing to occur. Thus you can, by simply drawing a straight line in logic, conclude that if they affect humans, they affect all life, even as insignificant as microorganisms which our ecosystem so heavily relies on. Infrasound will release metals from the soil, and our ecosystem will essentially collapse, thus creating a permanent scar on our entire environment, one that includes our precious bears, fish, and sacred Condor which is being released in this area. That clearly is against California law (https://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/t_e_spp/), and this is being ignored.
  Financially, there are concerns as well to all who live in or near Scotia. Property values, County tax increases to pay for upgrades to roads, PG&E base pay rate increases to pay for substation upgrades to handle the increased load, and no tax incentives for the community that is being most affected. The electricity will be going on the grid, which means that we will not see any benefit to ruining our environment. The jobs will be temporary construction, most likely governed by outside experts, and the 15 jobs boasted to be ongoing are all going to be specialists brought in from other areas, unless they are including janitorial, but most likely, that will be subcontracted. The county is being paid $2 million dollars for this intrusion per year, for the life of the project, which they claim is 30 years. They are selling our health, environment, and peace of mind on the cheap.
  I encourage all, as soon as you read this, to participate in community meetings, sign petitions, and contact your area publications, as well as delivering letters to the Humboldt Wind Energy Project Planner, County of Humboldt Planning Department, 3015 H Street, Eureka, CA 95501 or write electronically to [email protected].us. You have until 5pm June 14th, 2019.
Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kathi
Guest
Kathi
4 years ago

GREAT letter. Thank you.

stfu
Guest
stfu
4 years ago
Reply to  Kathi

The ignorant self centeredness of the environmentalists of humboldt would be a big funny joke if the situation wasnt so serious.

The vibration…silly…biggest wind turbines are in texas….the place is still full of gophers so the vibrations don’t amount to much. The people are having strokes because they are old.

The PLANET IS DIEING SO IT WONT BE HERE TO WORRY ABOUT IF SOMETHING DOESNT CHANGE NOW NOT LATER.

Julie Kuntz
Guest
Julie Kuntz
4 years ago
Reply to  stfu

And how close do you live to an industrial wind turbine? It is no joke.

bill nye
Guest
bill nye
4 years ago
Reply to  Julie Kuntz

Maybe this will amuse you.

https://youtu.be/wQnDGDXHNWU

Taurusballzhoff
Guest
Taurusballzhoff
4 years ago

It should be obvious that this is a stupid and ill-conceived project, proposed in an environmentally sensitive area, that will have huge impacts which few persons have considered.

We laud efforts to create electricity from renewable sources, but, we feel that Humboldt is not a good place to build a project of this size and scope.

Please voice your opposition to this poor quality plan. No amount of money is worth the environmental impact this project will have on Humboldt County…

Julie Kuntz
Guest
Julie Kuntz
4 years ago

And what place should have to put up with this worthless, industrial onslaught? Industrial Wind is a boondoggle.

bill nye
Guest
bill nye
4 years ago
Reply to  Julie Kuntz

This is the deep water horizon SEVEN YEARS LATER!!!
nothing from a windturbine can compare ma’am

Really?
Guest
Really?
4 years ago
Reply to  bill nye

Sir- No, it’s a photo of an oil cleaner boat at the time of the spill in 2010. This sort of misinformation is one reason why it’s so hard to get things done.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/03/14/the-gulf-war

El Cid
Guest
El Cid
4 years ago

A good letter explaining why green energy will never replace fossil fuel in our lifetime.
The state has mandated the transition to clean green energy within a decade, yet the very people that support the concept, are anti hydro electric, anti nuclear, anti wind, and they sue to kill massive solar arrays in the Mojave Desert, because they may cause too much shade for the Desert Tortoise. Nobody wants corporate power, but it takes a lot of money pooled together to share the risk of losing millions of dollars on Draft Environmental impact Reports on projects that will never be built due to local opposition who want clean energy, just not in their back yard. The cost of building green exceeds the return on the investment, without government subsidy. The only way it will work is if it is built and paid for by the government, which is broke and taxpayers cannot handle any more burden. We are lucky up here because we can survive hot summer days without electricity and air conditioning, and many have wood burning stoves to keep us warm in the winter. Good luck for the rest of this state! I have done my part, putting up solar panels, which will never pay off, and drive a hybrid, which saves on the ridiculous fuel prices, but it will never be clean energy, because of the environmental downside of building and disposing of the toxic battery components in China.

Karen Engwis
Guest
4 years ago

Hello Liv,

I live in the beautiful Yellowstone River Valley in Montana. The wildlife and aesthetic attributes in this area are too many to mention. Ourselves and three neighboring ranchers went up against Pattern Development who was set to begin a wind project on April 1, 2019. The project was planned in secrecy. Our community, except for the landowner involved and our county government, knew nothing about it. When the project was unveiled at the eleventh hour, September 2018, the four neighbors obtained legal council. We brought suit against Pattern Development on a claim of nuisance among several other claims (Park County DV 18-161). We asked for a preliminary injunction and prevailed. Fortunately, the preliminary injunction was enough to shut down the project completely. Wind companies are scrambling to complete projects before December 31, 2019 as that is when the subsidy money will dry up. Their projects must be challenged legally. Get the best lawyers you can find. More and more communities and individuals are standing up against big wind developers and winning.

My very best wishes to you!

Karen Engwis

Liv
Guest
Liv
4 years ago
Reply to  Karen Engwis

Thank you.

Our town directly affected is actually a company and the CEO is an environmental lawyer. Luckily, the next town is fighting this too. I’m so happy for your success. Mozel tov!

If California wants green energy in a decade, then they need to put solar on every single house, in every single town in this state. It is irresponsible to do permanent damage to environmentally sensitive areas, even in the quest for an alternative to fossil fuels. It makes absolutely no sense. We are saving to put solar on our home, because we feel that dedicated, but I am not willing to let them destroy the redwoods permanently for 30 years of electricity going on a market that makes the rich richer.

It is our own satire paradox in the making.

El Cid
Guest
El Cid
4 years ago

So, WHY is the progressive movement still pressing for green energy, and where and what should it be? We need to save our planet, but when industry moves forward with a plan, it draws opposition, no matter where or what it is. Most private individuals cannot afford their own solar or wind generation. Where do we get power to charge our batteries, heat our water, cool and heat our houses and power our TV’s and computers? NO nukes, dams for hydro electric, coal or natural gas fired power plants, what else? I installed solar panels for $15,000,and how smart was that? The sun only shines constantly 12 hours a day, 3 months out of the year. The rest of the time ,I pay even more for power than before the panels went up. Wind Generation is the new poster child for organized protests. Right out of the anti everything playbook:
http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/residents-air-concerns-about-proposed-strauss-wind-energy-farm-near-lompoc/

Liv
Guest
Liv
4 years ago
Reply to  El Cid

Read my reply below

Liv
Guest
Liv
4 years ago

If California wants green energy in a decade, then they need to put solar on every single house, in every single town in this state. It is irresponsible to do permanent damage to environmentally sensitive areas, even in the quest for an alternative to fossil fuels. It makes absolutely no sense. We are saving to put solar on our home, because we feel that dedicated, but I am not willing to let them destroy the redwoods permanently for 30 years of electricity going on a market that makes the rich richer.

It is our own satire paradox in the making.

Central HumCo
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Liv

Liv,

~i like what you say. I don’t pretend to know much about solar panels. I’ve read good and bad. Being under a canopy, solar panels aren’t on my list. My current thought on the subject is, (Open your mind(s) here), with the life-nurturing sun being blocked more and more . . . idk, i just don’t know.

Liv
Guest
Liv
4 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

1/3 of California roofs covered could light up every home. Feed excess into a grid, and we are lit.

It does not make sense to do anything else. I’m not willing to destroy my home to feed Marin County, who passed laws that disallow wind mill farms. You see, this is really all about money.

guest
Guest
guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Liv

Until efficient storage is technically possible, solar will not be enough for round the clock power. Which wind farms can.

But I agree with you that this proposal, in a world where CalEPA will nitpick an individual to death, seems to be more tax farming than wind harvesting.

Liv
Guest
Liv
4 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

1/3 of California roofs covered could light up every home. Feed excess into a grid, and we are lit.

It does not make sense to do anything else. I’m not willing to destroy my home to feed Marin County, who passed laws that disallow wind mill farms. You see, this is really all about money.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago
Reply to  Liv

Photovoltaics are not a panacea. The production of solar panels is resource and energy expensive. With China producing most of the world’s solar panels the waste stream from those facilities is nauseating. A lot of the waste just flows (quite literally ) out the back of the factory and into the nearest river.

The only promising energy production on the horizon is a fusion reactor. Lockheed-Martin’s skunkworks is claiming they’ll have one in production this year. If true that will be the single biggest technological achievement by humans ever. The magnitude of such an energy source can not be overstated. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_Compact_Fusion_Reactor

The fact is that oil drives our “civilized” world. Converting to some other energy source is not there. Even if there was a push to convert to 100% renewable energy sources it will take massive amounts of oil to get us there. And at the moment there is no “there”. Hydroelectric and Breeder reactors (fission reactors that produce very little waste compared to nuclear power plants used now) are the only feasible clean energy at the moment and they are not politically viable.

Rio Dell resident
Guest
Rio Dell resident
4 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

Great point. Have you heard of pumped hydro power? If so, what do you think of it? I know nothing is perfect, but some of the new technologies they’re developing now look very promising.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago

Yes. I’ve set up small scale versions. The problem is the power to run the pumps exceeds the power production of the turbine, so there is a net loss on every cycle. There was a proposal some years back that was intriguing using the ocean oscillations to drive pumps to an elevated reservoir to release that water through turbines… but it didn’t go anywhere.

The problem is scaling. All these “green” energies have merit on small scale in certain applications, but they don’t compare with the energy return we get from sucking oil out of the ground.

Rio Dell resident
Guest
Rio Dell resident
4 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

What if they pumped the water back up in short bursts, or stages, rather than trying to push it all back uphill at once? Just a thought…

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago

Hydroelectric, to produce massive amounts of power needs massive amounts of water. The pumps would need to pump the same volume in a given period as is released into the turbines to keep up.

The idea has merit, but relies on surplus electricity on off-peak hours to do the pumping and hydro release for extra production during peak hours.

It is why “traditional” hydroelectric works so well… gravity does the work, no pumping is needed.

El Cid
Guest
El Cid
4 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

Now we are talking real possibilities, but if we cannot agree on wind and hydro electric generation, will this country ever develop the political will to move on to any form of nuclear power? Perhaps when the grid is down and it’s 101 deg. in the shade, and old people are dying in their homes. (Solar is a pipe dream, I have it and it will never pencil out. Perhaps in Arizona, and only in the daylight. ) Thanks for the rational and intelligent thoughts,Rover, A bit of fresh air!

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago
Reply to  El Cid

You’re welcome. Unfortunately most discussion on this topic is about making slogans rather than solutions.

AOC and other progressives seem to ignore the fact that a transition from “fossil” fuels to any other energy source is going to take massive amounts of “fossil” fuels to do so. And our tech is nowhere close to divorcing itself from that cheap resource.

Liv
Guest
Liv
4 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

I think that’s only the uneducated environmentalist. Most of us who’ve really done our deep research completely understand this and that is why this project is not environmentally sound.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

I’m a little suprised anyone would find this suprising.

Central HumCo
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

~me too. But, some are either young know-it-alls, or too lazy to do research, or slow on the up take.

Would you say, Ull Rover, the all-consuming Agenda behind the more, more, more – bigger, better, faster (w/out our consent, or safety a consideration), is because of 5G? I’ve watched and read plenty on this, from the towers, to the massive size power lines w/box at each pole, being ‘rolled out’ in the cities . . . to deaths –in particular at San Diego State where a tower is adjacent to one of the dorms. But I don’t put the two together, with 5G as the reason. As opposed to ye ol “Over population” hype. Seems that the energy-guzzling counties would be where more, more, more should shoulder the Electricity “Farms”.

I was checking Youtube to see if “Energy From the Vacuum” by Lt. Col. Thomas Brearden, is still available. My disc copy is ten years old. Looks like the hours of filming, of many different types of “Free” energy devices Thomas Bearden has in his shop, has been cut-up into parts one, two and so on. I see he does have a recent video of 7 months ago “Pulling Energy from the Vacuum – Do not kill The Dipol” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTkUVo8QkX4 47 mins. This seems right up your alley.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

Zero point energy is compelling, but I have yet to see a compelling model of converting this potential to actual mechanical work. Our tech or our understanding might not be there yet, or it just doesn’t work the way some assume.

Central HumCo
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover

~i just watched this last night -it’s such a shortened version of the original one he did. Maybe view it again, or the parts that make up his first vid. Did you shake your head at the DO NOT KILL THE DIPOL part? This is humongous. Energy can’t be created or destroyed. The power mongers have “Generation” charges on the monthly tab. Well yeah -after one of the two dipoles are killed on the way into the generator, it takes twice as much energy to put it back before it exits the generator.

Sometimes i feel like we never left the Dark Ages, and are milling around in the darkest of ages.

Sid Vicious
Guest
Sid Vicious
4 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

We left the dark ages, only to be robbed by men in dark suits.

Dan
Guest
Dan
4 years ago

We enjoyed watching a pair of Golden Eagles a week ago Sunday up on Bear River Ridge. Terra Gen will be destroying their habitat and killing them for profit. You or I would be going to jail. This project will at best produce 1/3 of 1% of California’s electrical needs according to Terra Gen. It won’t stop global warming but it will most definitely destroy one of the most remarkable wild places in Humboldt County.
Federal Laws that Protect Bald Eagles
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act: “The bald eagle will continue to be protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act even though it has been delisted under the Endangered Species Act. This law, originally passed in 1940, provides for the protection of the bald eagle and the golden eagle (as amended in 1962) by prohibiting the take, possession, sale, purchase, barter, offer to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, of any bald or golden eagle, alive or dead, including any part, nest, or egg, unless allowed by permit Bald Eagle sitting in tree (16 U.S.C. 668(a); 50 CFR 22). “Take” includes pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb (16 U.S.C. 668c; 50 CFR 22.3). The 1972 amendments increased civil penalties for violating provisions of the Act to a maximum fine of $5,000 or one year imprisonment with $10,000 or not more than two years in prison for a second conviction. Felony convictions carry a maximum fine of $250,000 or two years of imprisonment. The fine doubles for an organization. Rewards are provided for information leading to arrest and conviction for violation of the Act.”

The deadline to comment on the DEIR is 5pm June 14, 2019.

https://humboldtgov.org/2408/Humboldt-Wind-Energy-Project

Direct Comments to:

Humboldt Wind Project Planner County of Humboldt
Planning and Building Department, Planning Division — 3015 H Street, Eureka, CA 95501

CEQARe…@co.humboldt.ca.us

—————————————————-

Out of time, but want short & easy? EPIC Automatic email letter to fill in and change on internet !!

https://epic.salsalabs.org/actionalerthumboldtwindenergyproject/index.html

You get 3000 characters. You can blank out their entire letter and write your own.

Jim Wiegand - Wildlife Biologist
Guest
Jim Wiegand - Wildlife Biologist
4 years ago

Excellent letter. Trailing along along with with these dirtbag developers is their fake research club. What they call research amounts to well designed lies. For the corrupt, these research lies are a meal ticket and an excuse to approve projects. For this reason, Humboldt County is in big trouble. Unfortunately there are no ethical watchdog agencies to address wind industry research fraud. Sure, there are groups and agencies like the CA Department of Fish and Wildlife or USFWS that claim to be looking after wind energy impacts, but their involvement is a two-faced reuse and they answer to the corrupt. So what this all means, is that the good people of this world have to spend fortunes to nail these creeps. This industry’s production of fraudulent research has proven hundreds of times over, that their impacts mean nothing and that’s exactly why the green energy pillagers left science behind decades ago. With science, this industry along with all their lies would have been buried long ago.