“Super Nice” Camo Clad Man with Gun on 101

Rio Dell Police feature icon

This afternoon, the scanner reported a man wearing camouflage and carrying a rifle on the 101 near Wildwood Avenue in Rio Dell which sounded scary.  But, later in the day, even as Sergeant Beauchaine described the man having a big marijuana leaf tattooed on his forehead, Beauchaine also said the man was “super nice” and that the weapon in question was a “bb gun.”

Happily, this was the big news on the scanner today.

 

 

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joe
Guest
Joe
5 years ago

Forehead tattoos are COOL!

Willie Caso-Mayhem
Guest
5 years ago
Reply to  Joe

Not when there accompanying by crazy.

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
5 years ago

crazy is relative. everyone is crazy. infact the more crazy the more fun.

Me_too
Guest
Me_too
5 years ago

He would have been killed anywhere else.

binbearda4
Guest
binbearda4
5 years ago

forehead tats say it all when it comes to crazy, though , I am as whacked as they get and I am still tat free so it’s not a given but does make a statement,,

HOJ in Training
Guest
HOJ in Training
5 years ago
Reply to  binbearda4

Yo, Kym. Does the comment made by binbearda4 strike you as prejudicial? I can’t even buy their statement that they’re as whacked as they get. Is this person trying to give themself a Title that clearly doesn’t belong to them?

Ullr rover
Guest
Ullr rover
5 years ago

Jeepers! Camo AND a rifle!

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
5 years ago
Reply to  Ullr rover

i know right! super scary a man with a gun !!!!! ok back to the truth. a man was walking down the road with nothing that he shouldnt have had.
this story is like calling 9 1 1 to report a woman walking down the street with a purse !!!.

LostCoastEMP
Guest
LostCoastEMP
5 years ago
Reply to  Antichrist

I saw this too but decided not to call it in. Man posed no threat to me or public safety. This is America ,and even if it was a legal unloaded rifle in open carry, he has the right to do so. Remember California citizens….. be afraid of guns, be very afraid. They are evil emplacements of murder and destruction and should banned from all law abiding,tax paying citizens!

Hubertus
Guest
Hubertus
5 years ago
Reply to  Antichrist

I’m pretty sure open carry is no longer allowed in California.

anon traveler
Guest
anon traveler
5 years ago
Reply to  Hubertus

depends on whether you are hunting or not.. Open Carry locked and loaded is STILL allowed for long guns and pistols when one is hunting with a license..

helps to actually KNOW the law before one spouts off
anon

Central HumCo
Guest
5 years ago
Reply to  anon traveler

“helps to actually KNOW the law before one spouts off.”

You’re confusing law and legal – nothing new here.

The second amendment is the “open carry” bull-oney TAX theft permission.

If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because its better to perish than live as slaves. Winston Churchill

Ullr rover
Guest
Ullr rover
5 years ago
Reply to  Hubertus

It’s a bit of a hodgepodge. California changed their open carry laws to exclude open carry in incorporated areas. That was the changed to allow counties to designate other areas that you can not open carry. Open carry is legal in all of Trinity County except the standard courthouse, school, church etc.

Dawncrowl
Guest
Dawncrowl
5 years ago
Reply to  Antichrist

The masses are being brainwashed.

Central HumCo
Guest
5 years ago
Reply to  Dawncrowl

Yah, they will willingly waltz right into a FEMA concentration camp. The old military base in Centerville is fenced w/the top wires pointing in.

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
5 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

i see i am not the only one that notices such things. trouble is, i tend to pass it off as folks not knowing which why to face them and figure on the 50/50 rule. Either way a fence has never stopped me from doing what i need to do in the past and i know fences will never stop me from doing what needs to be done in the future. it is after all about knowledge and the way one thinks. if one thinks like a sheep then sheep pens will hold them. but if one thinks like a fox or never thinks in just one form or another, then it takes much more to confine such a person.
once one has the knowledge one must decide how far they are willing to go before they are faced with needing to find out. once that has been determinded then all thoughts are based upon those limits if any.

Central HumCo
Guest
5 years ago
Reply to  Antichrist

Well said.

The path is safe, but it is extremely narrow. It is not for the faint of heart or the weak-willed.

Really?
Guest
Really?
5 years ago
Reply to  Antichrist

Rare are the needs. Many are the wants. And a whole lot of people can’t see the difference.

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
5 years ago
Reply to  Really?

desires bwcome needs if obsessed enough on. No group of people or persons needs or wants have priority over my desires or needs, or those of my friends and families. Read someones “need” to feel safe,without taking personal steps to secure it does not exceed my need ,desire, or right to defend myself from not only them but the agents they send to enforce their false sense of security.
As for the Fema camps. that has already happened. each and everytime a law restricting a action is enacted based upon others actions is the perfect example of such things. an over the top example is the passing of the patriot act. it basicly attempt to strip all rigjts from citizens based upon fear of repeat actions of 911. People practicaly begged for such and no calmly remove their shoes before flying thinking falsely that it makes them any safer. Yet for as little as 10k usd anyone can charter a jet have a care drive onto the tarmac and load whomever or whatever onto it without ever going through a single search checkpoint or removing their shoes. if one thinks that 10k usd is not an easily amount for those wishing to harm us to aquire they are saddly mistaken as most groups wishing to harm us are very well funded. so here is merely one example of a 10k usd event that would bypass the how large tsa and homeland budgets ? keep trusting the goverment to keep you safe .

shak
Guest
shak
5 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

When was that done? Under whose orders? Where were the protesters?
Where are the protesters now? (can protest via phone, email, social media to those who are responsible for it, as well as by posters, marches, assembly awareness, etc)

HOJ in Training
Guest
HOJ in Training
5 years ago

Sure would be nice to have such a neighbor living near me. Might stop all of the reckless fools from spinning donuts in the “Redneck Raceway” also known as the CalTrans lot.

Bill dance
Guest
Bill dance
5 years ago

No regerts

J
Guest
J
5 years ago
Reply to  Bill dance

Lol, my favorite tattoo!

shak
Guest
shak
5 years ago

They were prepared to use ‘force’ to get their way. That’s never a good idea.
The (unarmed) but desperate Veterans (of all races) tried it (to force their cause) in the 30’s and were met with Artillery Tanks and the rest of the military.
The 2nd amendment is for defense, not assault.

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/bonusarmy.htm

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
5 years ago
Reply to  shak

defence from a over reaching goverment. one could argue that in order to defend oneself from said actions one must retake said group.

shak
Guest
shak
5 years ago
Reply to  Antichrist

That’s where Freedom of Speech, a platform, informing all representatives, a petition addressing grievances, and the allegations properly documented come in.
When all of the known ways of address have been used, the sheriff is under oath to make a citizen’s arrest of the tyrants, upon request. If the Sheriff is one of the tyrants, then it is up to the citizen’s to arrest.
With that said, we need to question the events of above.
Yes, they were correct in petitioning, assembling, addressing…
Yes, they were wrong to to try to force their cause instead of trying to further an open discussion.
Should either have been ignored? No.
Should the ‘hostages’ have been forced to comply? No.

Our Founding Fathers fought the Brits so that we’d never have to.

Was it wrong to collectively penalize all citizens for the actions of a few? Yes.
Extremely wrong. Cowardly wrong.
What steps have the citizen’s taken to unite in peaceful ways to readdress their grievances against tyranny?
Does blaming one another unite? No.
Nobody readdressed the readdressed.
We just crawled into our corners and wept.

Readdress:
Look at or attend to (an issue or problem) once again.

‘an opportunity for the balance of resources between residential care and community care to be readdressed’
‘they have to readdress themselves to the problem of defeating the other teams’
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/readdress

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
5 years ago
Reply to  shak

in this day and age we cant get folks to agree on the color of a sign let along take responsibility for their own actions. being as it is. drastic times would warrent drastic measures. burn the fields and replant. hit reset. or just ignore it not risking personal loss and drink the kool aid join the sheep and fall blissfully to sleep like everyone else

shak
Guest
shak
5 years ago
Reply to  Antichrist

Drastic measures in this day and age means:
Turning off the Mockingbird media. (hollywood, music, news, blogs,
Reading the DOI and the Constitution.
Holstering all bias and previous brainwashed interpretations.

Central HumCo
Guest
5 years ago

Liberty, dignity, a decent standard of living is fundamental. I think people are beginning to realize that you don’t have those things unless you have a pretty large free market sector. Any Iron Curtain country had neither liberty, nor a very high standard of living. Economic and political freedom, the two things go together.

shak
Guest
shak
5 years ago
Reply to  Central HumCo

A decent standard of living is variable to each individual.
A hobo relishes freedom from walls of any kind.
A family relishes freedom from intruders that only walls can provide.

Liberty is the freedom to choose.
Dignity is making the right choice for your self and coping with any consequences in a dignified way.
Fundamental is the basic rule of law.
Capitalism allows each individual the chance to achieve their hoped for standard of living and dignity.
Iron Curtains provide a mandated version of a leader’s standards and you have no say on whether or not you wish to comply.

Central HumCo
Guest
5 years ago
Reply to  shak

True enough.

River Rat
Guest
River Rat
5 years ago

there was someone shooting at cars with an air rifle along a southern calif freeway some time ago. not this person. I am a hunter and i like guns , but why would someone be packing a bb gun along a freeway? Glad he was SUPER NICE.

Ullr rover
Guest
Ullr rover
5 years ago
Reply to  River Rat

… you find yourself with a firearm (or bb gun) and need to get from point a to point b but don’t have the means to use a vehicle. So you walk. It’s tough to walk with a rifle stuffed down your pants (and illegal without a CCW) so you carry it… which MAY be illegal as well depending where you are. So, what do you do?