Save the Redwoods League and HSU Research Confirms Redwoods’ Role in Climate

Grizzly Creek Redwoods State Park | Photo: State Parks

Grizzly Creek Redwoods State Park [Photo: State Parks]

Press release from HSU:

Recent findings bolster more than 10 years of research, confirming massive carbon storage in old-growth redwood forests and potential of younger, previously logged forests.

Newly published research from Save the Redwoods League and Humboldt State University (HSU) confirms the exceptionally large role that redwood forests can play in California’s strategy to address climate change. The research demonstrates that old-growth coast redwood forests store more carbon per acre than any other forest type. Forests of giant sequoia, coast redwoods’ closest relative, come in second. The findings cap 11 years of research through the League’s Redwoods and Climate Change Initiative (RCCI), which has also revealed that younger second-growth coast redwood forests grow quickly enough to result in substantial carbon storage in a relatively short period. This makes a strong case for investing in the restoration of previously logged redwood forests.

Seeking to understand how redwoods are responding to rising temperatures, hotter droughts, and other factors associated with climate change, Save the Redwoods League launched its ambitious research partnership with Humboldt State University in 2009. In the latest phase of the initiative, the team of scientists studied redwood forests throughout their geographic ranges and the growth rates of previously logged forests. These studies help establish management goals for redwoods in terms of tree height, biomass, carbon storage, wood production, and biological diversity. This work helps to identify where coast redwood trees have the highest potential to recover their stature quickly in harvested forests; where environmental and climatic conditions limit growth; and where improved forest stewardship is essential to increase coast redwood and giant sequoia forests’ resilience to climate change.

To arrive at their most recent findings, published in the latest edition of Forest Ecology and Management, the RCCI team combined intensive measurements and tree ring sampling to develop formulas for accurately quantifying forest biomass and productivity. In this study, the team climbed and measured 114 redwood trees ranging from 59 feet to 380 feet tall and from 115 to 2,340 years old.

“While the recent results improve our understanding of the carbon storage capacity of the state’s treasured old-growth forests, they also reveal that individual redwood trees can maintain high rates of productivity for well over 1,000 years,” said HSU Professor Steve Sillett, lead author of the studies and an expert on redwood forests. “Just as exciting is the fact that young redwood forests can accumulate biomass at rates even faster than old-growth stands—with trees surpassing 200 feet tall in less than a century. Our research shows that investing in redwoods’ restoration—in particular helping to set second-growth forests on the trajectory to old-growth characteristics—would have tangible carbon benefits.”

California’s Climate Strategy and the Opportunities in Redwoods Restoration

These RCCI results are provided as policymakers in California and all over the world are exploring the potential of natural solutions to the climate change crisis, particularly the role forests play in storing carbon in their wood as they grow. California’s current strategy for meeting its ambitious goals for reducing global greenhouse gases identifies an important role for natural and working lands. In 2019, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change also issued a special report on the outsized role that forest conservation and restoration can play in addressing climate change.

“We have long recognized how iconic the redwood forests are to California’s identity,” said Save the Redwoods League President and CEO Sam Hodder. “Now we know that these redwoods are also our allies in the fight against climate change. That gives us all the more reason to accelerate the pace and scale of our efforts to protect and restore young, recovering forests and set them on course to become the old-growth forests of the future.”

Prior to industrial logging, California had more than 2 million acres of ancient redwoods, but now only about 113,000 acres of old-growth redwood forests remain, largely protected in parks and preserves. According to Sillett’s team, there can be up to 890 metric tons of carbon (1 metric ton = 2,205 pounds) stored per acre of old-growth redwood forest, which is the estimated equivalent of taking about 700 passenger vehicles off the road for a year.

In place of all that lost old-growth forest now stand about 1.5 million acres of younger second-growth redwood forests. Most of these forests (1.1 million acres) are commercially managed, with the remainder in various degrees of conservation ownership. While these regrowing forests don’t match old-growth forests in terms of total biomass or carbon storage per acre, they grow extremely quickly and recover fire- and decay-resistant carbon storage capacity fast.

In a study published last year, the RCCI team found that in 150 years, fast-growing second-growth redwood forests can accumulate 40 percent as much biomass and store 30 percent as much carbon as the original old-growth in their decay-resistant heartwood. Further, some redwood forests that were logged in the mid-1800s have already accumulated as much as 339 metric tons of carbon per acre—the equivalent of taking about 270 passenger vehicles off the road for one year. This level of carbon storage has profound implications when extended across 1.5 million acres of second-growth redwood forests.

These results suggest that investments in actively restoring second-growth redwood forests will result in substantial carbon sequestration without having to wait several centuries for the benefits of old-growth forests. These numbers have important implications when considering the potential carbon storage capacity across hundreds of thousands—or even millions—of acres of protected old-growth and regenerating redwood forests.

“It is critical to protect what remains of our ancient redwoods, restore the young recovering forests and make smart investments now in our nature-based solutions to climate change,” Hodder said. “In so doing, we will enhance the forests and parks that inspire and attract millions of visitors from around the globe. And we will demonstrate California’s leadership in building a more climate-resilient world.”

There is still a lot more to learn about how climate change will affect redwoods in the long run. Research from the RCCI partnership thus far indicates that the trees themselves were largely resilient to the recent drought. In fact, individual coast redwoods and giant sequoia in most old-growth forests studied to date have actually experienced a growth surge since the mid-1900s. At the same time, emerging research has shown that climate change-related shifts in fire severity, drought and forest pests have begun to impact giant sequoia, indicating a need for continued study of these forests in coming decades.

About Save the Redwoods League
One of the nation’s oldest conservation organizations, Save the Redwoods League has been protecting and restoring redwood forests since 1918, connecting generations of visitors with the beauty and serenity of the redwood forest. Our 29,000 supporters have enabled the League to protect more than 216,000 acres of irreplaceable forests in 66 state, national and local parks and reserves. For more information, go to SaveTheRedwoods.org.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alf
Guest
Alf
3 years ago

Save the Redwoods League and HSU in a combined research project? Wow! That doubles my skepticism that any part of the research was done unbiased with no agenda. I’m sure any time they came up with conflicting facts they were easily able to rewrite the results. And the liberals won’t question it because of the source.

Save the Redwoods League is a highly questionable group with a history of activities that border closely on terrorism. HSU isn’t much better.

Alf
Guest
Alf
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Terrorism doesn’t require killing. It requires only force for a political agenda, which they have supported for years.

North west
Guest
North west
3 years ago
Reply to  Alf

And that’s your alien facts report. Climate change is a real thing no matter what planet you’re from unless it’s planet turmup

Low and Slow
Guest
Low and Slow
3 years ago
Reply to  North west

The climate changes everyday….long before people were here….the political propaganda that goes with it….gets old

lol
Guest
lol
3 years ago
Reply to  Low and Slow

Climate cannot change daily, by definition. Sounds like you are thinking of weather.

Low and Slow
Guest
Low and Slow
3 years ago
Reply to  lol

Ok….the climate has been changing long before people have been here….the political propaganda that goes with it…gets old…..

Fun with facts!
Guest
Fun with facts!
3 years ago
Reply to  Low and Slow

…and then the climate started changing exponentially faster as soon as people cut down all the trees. I’m sure you’re an intelligent and passionate fellow, maybe you should support some more deforestation, write letters to the government “Kill more trees, please. The protesting bores me.”

DivideByZero
Guest
DivideByZero
3 years ago
Reply to  North west

I don’t know of single person who denies the climate changes. But that wasn’t the call, now was it?

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
3 years ago
Reply to  Alf

The redwood forest is a very small part of the west coast ecosystem. All forests sequester carbon. This study reveals nothing new and involved drilling holes in the trees to age them,a totally unnecessary and damaging act.

Fun with facts!
Guest
Fun with facts!
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeffersonian

The redwood forest was home to YOUR ecosystem, assuming you actually live here. I’m not a flat earther, we live on a sphere, a balanced aquarium. I’m down with jeffersonianismz, but not shooting ourselves in the foot by naysaying an intelligent conclusion regarding future development. The rivers are drying up, that’s a fact. The canopy stored and precipitated moisture for the world. Year round fog along the California coast disappeared altogether in less than 20 years.

Alf
Guest
Alf
3 years ago

Rivers are drying up more from diversion to southern California and added population to the state than by any other reason.

Fun with facts!
Guest
Fun with facts!
3 years ago
Reply to  Alf

Yes, it’s human “consumption”. There’s finite surface area. Surface area that once provided “natural resources”, is being permanently destroyed, and being made into even more surface area that requires even more natural resources to be destroyed at an even greater rate. It’s the most basic science. The people alive during the logging boom knew it as well as the people before them. Politics are irrelevant, it’s a problem that needs to be fixed.

Fummins
Guest
Fummins
3 years ago
Reply to  Alf

The big grows that siphon off water ain’t helping out either.

Canyon oak
Guest
Canyon oak
3 years ago

Any kid can sense the magic and power of a unhumanified landscape.
The bullshit professional talk of “experts” may be thought provoking for global consumers, in square consumer society, but it’s pushing me further from the ranks of my own environmentalist past and in to the open arms of actual nature,
and common poetry..

UpYours
Guest
UpYours
3 years ago
Reply to  Canyon oak

well said Canyon Oak

b.
Guest
b.
3 years ago
Reply to  Canyon oak

A Native ecologist pointed out that the inland rains were seeded by the moisture, volatile organic compounds and microbes lifted into the fog by the Redwood/Tanoak forests of the fog belt. The fog belt was narrowed by the cutting of the redwoods and tanoaks and inland summer rains reduced to nearly nothing, especially in the high coast ranges of Mendocino, Lake and Napa/Sonoma. Consider the cost of taking out both the old growth redwood/tanoak forests in increased fire intensity and decreased summer river flow. Then imagine those effects rippling accross the mountain ranges of the west.

On the other hand “taking 700 passenger vehicles off the road for a year” “is the equivalent of taking 700 passenger vehicles for a year.” Whatever your car is doing to the environment is not being fixed by the restoration of forests. If you’re concerned about your car, do something about it. If you’re concerned about the forests and rivers, do something about that.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
3 years ago
Reply to  b.

There have never been inland summer rains other than thunderstorms above 5000 feet in northern calif and these are generated by the southwest monsoons not the fog belt. Check the rainfall records of the past. The scant summer rain remains the same.

Fun with facts!
Guest
Fun with facts!
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeffersonian

“There have never been inland summer rains other than thunderstorms above 5000 feet in northern calif ”

You’re not from northern calif.

“The scant summer rain remains the same.”

Yeah, the inland summer rain that never happens in northern calif, is getting scanter every season.

b.
Guest
b.
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeffersonian

I live on the slopes of the Yolla Bollies, and, yes there have been, and are no longer, consistent inland summer rains on the ridges from Hull Mountain to the highway 36 corridor. The spring rains end earlier and the fall rains come later. My oldest friends to the north and south report the same change. The waves of moisture in the fog belt that come crashing over the Mainstem Eel Canyon, sometimes only on the western side but often on the east, have also changed in my memory and more importantly in the memories of those older and longer resident here, passed down by their elders.

Canyon oak
Guest
Canyon oak
3 years ago
Reply to  b.

love the inner coast range!
grew up around the low elevation mayacamas mountains and loved going up to the headwaters of the eel river by hull, snow mountain and the rice fork.
A very under appreciated area.
I’ve done a few hikes in the yolla bollies, but not in years..
Now I’m up north in the Klamath mountain matrix
Once the weed economy is over and things clear out, I’d like to visit the inner coast range again

Gail S.
Guest
Gail S.
3 years ago

I guess you commenters haven’t hung out in the redwoods on a hot day recently. Cool. The warming was bound to occure when the population deforested and cleared huge tracts of shade, and then covered it with non-breathing, heat absorbing black assfault. And Save the Redwoods League started out grassroots and continue doing good deeds.

Ben Waters
Guest
Ben Waters
3 years ago

Many folks in Humboldt County seem to think that our redwood forests are somehow immune from catastrophic fire. But the reality is more likely to be that we’ve just been lucky so far. Tick Tock…

hmm
Guest
hmm
3 years ago
Reply to  Ben Waters

If we keep getting dryer due t climate change maybe they will be under threat of fire. They are highly fire adapted and our climate is historically wet. But if you are right then the best thing we can do is let them return to old growth over the next 1000 years.

hmm
Guest
hmm
3 years ago

End all export of redwood material from our state. Let the remaining 3% recover for a century or two.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
3 years ago

The redwood forest is a very small part of the west coast ecosystem. All forests sequester carbon. This study reveals nothing new and involved drilling holes in the trees to age them,a totally unnecessary and damaging act.

e
Guest
e
3 years ago

When I first moved here in the 70’s, I was told by the “old timers”, that the large forest areas keep the moisture and that is why we had the heavy fog back then. Then Palco logged like crazy in the 90’s and since not much fog.

Fun with facts!
Guest
Fun with facts!
3 years ago
Reply to  e

Sadly, by the 70’s most of what were redwoods had already been replanted with other varieties for faster turnover. Then, yes, in the 90’s the logging companies went all-in as soon as it became known that the rules of their business were about to change. The logging companies are tree farms, and much of what we see as forest around here is not native and will never reach maturity. Very dry as well, fire fuel. But it won’t make the news often, especially the correlation to wildfires, because the logging companies have a financial stronghold on our “services”, which includes government and sponsership.

The federal government should subsidize the logging companies to a complete transition from timber production to true native forest rebuilding. Federal money should literally pay the same people who are cutting down the trees, to recreate the habitat that existed here for eons before them.

In the absolute very least, all clearcutting can and should stop immediately.

Fun with facts!
Guest
Fun with facts!
3 years ago

Replant tall native trees everywhere. Should be priority numero uno all over the world. We need the world’s ancient canopy of life back, the lungs of the earth.

Steve
Guest
Steve
3 years ago

In Humboldt there a few different places to get native plants, shrubs, and trees. Down south in the big cities it is far and few natives to be found to buy.

Canyon oak
Guest
Canyon oak
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve

There’s a good book out there called “growing California native plants”, written by Marjorie Schmidt.
I think UC Berkeley put it out.