Forest Service Announces Large Prescribed Fire Project in Shasta-Trinity National Forest

Press Release From the U.S. Forest Service:

feature IconThe Shasta-Trinity National Forest is planning a large-scale prescribed fire project called the Trinity Alps Wilderness Prescribed Fire Project. This project plans to treat 19,000 acres of the landscape in order to return fire to the area in a way that will create strategic opportunities for future wildfire response. The project will help protect nearby communities and valuable resources by reducing fuel loads in wildfire prone areas.

The Trinity Alps Wilderness is a vast landscape known for its remote areas of steep, rugged terrain and stunning backcountry lakes. It is also a landscape known for its recent history of large, high-severity wildfires. The 1999 Big Bar complex, 2006 Bar complex, 2008 Iron-Alps complex and 2015 River complex are all examples of large, fires in the western Alps.

These large fires were fueled by dense vegetation resulting after many years of aggressive fire suppression. In turn these fires also left a large amount of dead and down debris.

“The large patches of heavy dead and down woody debris will likely lead to a continued cycle of large fires with large high severity patches,” explained Forest Fire Ecologist Kevin Osborne. “These large fires are more intense, and more difficult to control, especially in the western half of the Trinity Alps.”

Historically the area experienced frequent fires of lower severity. Frequent naturally-occurring fires were kept in check by sparser fuel and landscape features, such as streams and ridges, which impeded fire spread. Without this natural fire cycle, forest vegetation has become increasingly dense to the point where fires can spread more easily over greater areas, and burn with greater intensity. Large, naturally fire-resistant trees are increasingly at risk from abnormally large areas burning with high severity effects.

“Historically, our forests are adapted to, and in fact depend on, mild fire to remain healthy and resilient in the face of things like drought, insects and wildfires,” said Trinity River Management Unit District Ranger Joe Smailes. “Applying prescribed fires under the right conditions that will allow consumption of existing fuels will help restore the historical resilient conditions of the landscape. Furthermore, after years of planning I am excited to see the project move forward as the Trinity Alps Wilderness becomes an increasingly popular destination.”

The preliminary Environmental Assessment for the Trinity Alps Wilderness Prescribed Fire Project is available for a 30-day comment period. More information on the project including instructions for commenting can be found on the Forest website: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=30965, or you can contact Stephanie Riess at the Weaverville Ranger Station at [email protected] (530) 623-1755.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Canyon oak
Guest
Canyon oak
4 years ago

Get it strait get Smokey, your telling us you’ve been lying for 100 years, lol

bearj
Guest
bearj
4 years ago

can you good folks do this in late September before a rainstorm instead of during 100 degree weather? TY from a timber guy near there…

Willie Caos-mayham
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  bearj

🕯🌳They can’t seem to get there timing right or they think they are timing it with a approaching rain event?

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
4 years ago

Does anybody know the start date?

Oreguno
Guest
Oreguno
4 years ago
Reply to  Rod Gass

No, but looking into the link Robin provided I see under “Project Detail”…

Project Status
Current Status…Under Analysis

Project Milestones…
Last Completed Milestone: Comment Period (07/25/2019)
Next Milestone: Objection Period (est. 10/01/2019)

So I would assume they don’t know exactly when the fires are lit but around Oct. 1 they expect to be in their “Objection” phase. Sounds like the right time of year, weather permitting.

Robert
Guest
Robert
4 years ago
Reply to  Oreguno

I’d be willing to bet” objection phase” is time period for filing as to why this shouldn’t be done.

Ymmv

Mike
Guest
Mike
4 years ago
Reply to  Rod Gass

I’m sure it entirely depends on favorable weather conditions. I’m glad they are starting g to do proactive and productive measures

Martin
Guest
Martin
4 years ago

Not a very bright move this time of year. Might go from 19,000 acres to god knows what in a split second. Good luck Forest Service, you are going to need it!

Mike
Guest
Mike
4 years ago
Reply to  Martin

Where did it say they would be doing it right now? Nobody is going to control burn 19,000 acres in August. It’s just informing the public early

This Is My Name
Guest
This Is My Name
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike

People on this site don’t have strong reading comprehension skills. They like to make-believe all kinds of words and sentences that aren’t there.

Willie Caos-mayham
Guest
4 years ago

🕯🌳Two people didn’t they actually followed the link and found out that they may not be doing this until they are sure it’s going to rain or at least hope its going to be, and the way things are shaping up they maybe right.

Canyon oak
Guest
Canyon oak
4 years ago

I love the idea of properly functioning eco systems, and fire is a big part of any landscape around here.
There is also some doubt about the new recreational approach to fire management, amongst regular people.
This century, I hope the professionals are right..

Martin
Guest
Martin
4 years ago

This Is My Name, you can kiss my “shake and bake” blanket, if you can figure out what it means. I just commented that it was a poor time of year for a prescribed burn. So did several other people. Why don’t you comment on the article instead of bad mouthing people. Make you feel like a big shot?

Silverlining
Guest
Silverlining
4 years ago

I’m guessing they will ignite at the top and let it burn downhill.

Willie Caos-mayham
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Silverlining

🕯🌳Depending on prevailing winds.

Camper
Guest
Camper
4 years ago

Sounds like a good move. The amount of campfires from inexperienced backpackers out there every summer is worrisome. To be able to to treat that many acres at one time would be great! Obviously you can never eliminate wildfires but reducing fuels to reduce intensity of wildfires seems like a step in the right direction for sure.

Gay Berrien
Guest
Gay Berrien
4 years ago

The smoke could still cause air quality problems that could affect surrounding communities. The New River backcountry we believe is much more risky an area than “normal” for conducting a prescribed burn–too much chance of its getting out of control. Too many places that the computer analyses miss that could “blow up.” And burning the area puts dozens of historic and prehistoric sites at risk–evidence from first miners beginning in 1851 with their little cabins, placer and hard rock mine activity areas, ditches and flumes, and four historic mining camps including in the Old Denny area and Pony Creek. Prehistoric sites, whose lithic scatters can be affected by heat (if they haven’t been already by previous fire situations), are found in several places, indications of the New River Shasta and edged by the Hupa at the west and Karuk at the North. The Chimariko may also have used the proposed burn area as part of their territory although they were normally lower on the river. Mainly this particular area is so risky for a prescribed burn and I hope folks will respond to the public input invitation if they have any qualms. This is a major proposed burn. It is Wilderness Area and why not just leave it as it is?

Better to have a fire on your own terms
Guest
Better to have a fire on your own terms
4 years ago
Reply to  Gay Berrien

Why not leave it as it is? Because nobody wants communities like Denny to burn. There are times of year you wouldn’t want any ignition, and there are times of year that you couldn’t get a fuel soaked pile to burn. Somewhere in the middle are good days for inviting fire back onto the landscape. It’s the cheapest quickest, and most natural way to get back to a little more mellow fuel loading.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago

Done right, I think this is a good move by the USFS. This area of the Trinity Alps has more fuel load than to the east.

Obviously this is not a burn they are proposing for August or September.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
4 years ago
Reply to  Ullr Rover