Assemblymember Wood on Governor’s May Revised Budget

jim wood ad2 twitter photo

Assemblymember Jim Wood AD2

The following is a press release from Assemblymember Jim Wood:

Thursday the Governor presented his revised budget for 2019-20 and overall I’m encouraged by many of his proposals; however, I do have some concerns. Here are some of the issues I believe are critical for our state and also for the people in the district I represent.

In the area of health care, I support the Governor proposing to reinstate the penalty for the individual mandate within the Affordable Care Act that was removed by Congress and the Trump administration. The need for the individual mandate was an essential part of what made the ACA work and will return diversity to the risk pool, which contributes to the affordability of Covered California premiums. The funds collected through this penalty will be used to help increase premium subsidies and even increase the number of people who qualify for subsidies, allowing more people with middle incomes to afford coverage; however, reintroducing the penalty cannot be successful without additional cost-savings efforts. My goal is to make purchasing coverage more do-able than paying the penalty. And to get there, we have to continue to tackle affordability and cost containment.

The Governor did not include in his budget an extension of the MCO tax, a tax on managed care organizations. This tax, which generates $1.5 billion in state revenue and expires this year, needs to be continued. I will advocate for Governor Newsom to submit a federal waiver request to continue it and am pleased that Assembly leadership supports that.

Public health is all about prevention and investing in it is critical, not only for the public it serves to protect from adverse health issues, but it is also a prudent use of resources that saves money in treatment costs.

I support the Governor adding $40 million to the budget to support fighting infectious diseases, primarily sexually transmitted diseases, and this is very important to local public health departments.

The opioid crisis continues and must be addressed on many fronts and I support the $70 million the Governor has allocated for medically assisted treatment within the correctional system to treat substance use disorder so that when people who have been incarcerated are better able to cope with the other challenges they will face upon release.

All of these issues show how important it is to protect funding for public health programs and that’s why I am concerned that the Governor may divert some public health funds to support portions of his Parents Agenda. There is no question that families feel the pinch of working and paying for child care and that we should increase the Earned Income Tax Credit. There’s no question that we should remove the sales tax on diapers and menstrual products as I do – it unfairly targets women and low-income families – but I can’t support using existing public health dollars to pay for it – we need to find another way.

How we support the victims and their families, prevention activities and rebuilding efforts after the wildfires that devastated our state is one of my major priorities.

I was pleased to see that the Governor has maintained the $200 million annual funding in the budget to support healthy forest and prescribed fire and fuel reduction activities and it was encouraging to hear the Governor express general support today for my bill AB 38, which establishes a $1 billion fund to help homeowners harden their homes and property against fire. This is a serious priority for me. This week was Wildfire Preparedness Week and the Governor has shown his concern for preventing future disasters, so I hope he agrees that finding the funds for this one-time budget ask is absolutely appropriate in a year when revenues are healthy.

We all know how desperate we are for new and affordable housing, only made worse by the devastation caused by the wildfires. Only 77,000 units were built last year when we need hundreds of thousands more. I was pleased that the Governor recognizes that one of the barriers local cities and counties experience is the need for funds to build the infrastructure, like water and sewer lines, to support new housing, so the money he is making available for that purpose will be very welcomed.

In the area of education, I am very supportive of the Governor’s commitment to vocational education and the allocation of $72.5 million for this purpose. We also have a housing and homelessness crisis at our CSUs and appreciate the funding he has allocated to begin to address the challenges students are facing.

Although I was pleased to hear about the development of a Master Plan for early learning, I am concerned that he did not mention a Master Plan for Aging, which he promised in his January inaugural speech. I will push for that as a priority because we must have a plan to address issues of aging because that is California’s largest growing population and we have a significant number of vulnerable seniors who need our support.

We will begin the process of reconciling our priorities with the Governor’s and I look forward to better understanding the details in the coming weeks as we finalize the 2019-20 budget.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Down with gavin
Guest
Down with gavin
4 years ago

What they should be working on is how there gonna start respecting our constitutional rights !!!!! How there gonna stop overtaxing,over extorting,and stealing our water rights
. It’s too late for most of us in California at the current government extortion rate the ships that arnt sailing to SAFER waters are going too sink.this is a state for the rich(like silver spoon fed rich little gavin net worth of 20 million). Its time for a REAL change in California it’s time for representation that isn’t rich and corparate minded and baught by corparate campaign donations!!!!!

Willie Caso-Mayhem
Guest
4 years ago

🕯🌳Thank you Kelley for sharing that with us.

Politician Watch
Guest
Politician Watch
4 years ago

Politician talk -“I think that there can never enough spending on budget items with nice sounding names that will never be reviewed in detail to see if they actually worked and what the total cost was. I also support in principle every bit of spending that impresses the voters in my district but, luckily for me , there is no chance getting passed so I can conveniently blame someone else for everything that will go wrong forever. ”

I wish every bill was required to include a real measurable goal and a statement of funding sources and was required to have a public accounting at 2 and 5 years after passage. Meanwhile it’s National Clean Up Your Room Day on May 10th.

Mary Ella Anderson
Guest
Mary Ella Anderson
4 years ago

Wood is no friend to universal health care. His money comes from corporate health care organizations who get between the patient and his or her health care provider. His main goal is protecting the health care insurance industry.

skeptic
Guest
skeptic
4 years ago

Great, another moronic politician who wants the poorest and most financially vulnerable to fund HIS insurance.

Jim Wood, you will NEVER, EVER get MY vote, and I TRULY hope you are voted out of office in your next run.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
4 years ago

I doubt any money or benefits will reach Mendocino County.
Gavin takes care of Sacramento, San Francisco & LA and sends peanuts to rural areas.

Healthcare including Medicare is inadequate, especially if you can’t afford additional coverage. Where is vision, hearing aids and other
services the rural elderly desperately need??

LostCoastEMP
Guest
LostCoastEMP
4 years ago

More taxes with no plan. Welcome to socialism.

Rod Gass
Guest
Rod Gass
4 years ago

I noticed that Assemblymember Jim Wood made no mention of the perpetually downward revised tax revenue from Recreational Legalization of Marijuana also know as prop 64. Since the rollout Californians have not been in support of this excess taxation. It seems to be snowballing.

We all remember the Governor’s promises of outrageous tax revenue. We’ll overcome the retirement bankruptcy by taxing the weed market. We’ll enjoy a new source of much needed revenue. Jump on board with “legalization” so we can balance the budget. The trend is spiraling down the drain. Failure is imminent.

All that “legal” marijuana and nowhere to retail it “legally”.

Diane
Guest
Diane
4 years ago

No mention of raising funding for schools. Which in the long run, may keep people out of jail and off drugs. But it’s ok – they are raising taxes to “help” all those they system failed

shak
Guest
shak
4 years ago
Reply to  Diane

They spend it all on sanitizing the streets of LA? That’s why the other cities and towns can’t afford to hire extra trash pickup for zoned areas for the homeless.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7095533/Pictures-downtown-LA-capture-problem-faces-trash-tries-rodents.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus

Diane
Guest
Diane
4 years ago

No mention of raising funding for schools. Which in the long run, may keep less people out of jail and off drugs. But it’s ok – they are raising taxes to “help” all those they system failed

shak
Guest
shak
4 years ago

I have a question regarding health care. Why do the politicians charge the big pharmacies extra taxes for all the extra side effects they have, then push many of said drugs-vaccines onto the public through mandates and other power trips while denying the drugs-vaccines have any side effects?
Also, why don’t the politicians mandate full disclosure in every drug-vaccine mandate? Why don’t they inform the public that if they have any side effects, to report them immediately to Vaers? https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
Also, why aren’t the politicians helping POTUS to reduce the pharmaceutical costs even more than he’s been able to do solo?
Also, why don’t the politicians disclose the cdc reports that disclose that over half of the ‘cases’ of illnesses are from foreigners who entered without due diligence? Half aren’t even tested for said illness, yet are classified as having the illness, etc?
Also, why is insurance mandated?
Also, why do politicians own stock in companies that they legislate on?
IOW, Why aren’t the politicians cleaning up the Health Care problems that the politicians themselves appear to have created in the first place?