Long Term Relationship with Fire Needed to Prevent Further Catastrophe Says ISF

embracing fire poster

Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency over California’s extreme fire activity these past several years. In response, the Institute of Sustainable Forestry (ISF) are coordinating “Embracing Fire” with CalFire, BLM, the Garberville Rotary, Southern Humboldt Firesafe Council, Six Rivers National Forest, Mendocino National Forest, and others. Embracing Fire will be a day of discussions and activity focused on appropriate fire prevention. The community is invited on May 11, the day before Mother’s Day, tothe Mateel Community Center to learn we can each do to prevent rapacious forest fires from devastating our area. ISF says this will be a family friendly event with kids’ activities included.

Tim Bailey, Director of Watershed Science at the ISF,said one of his goals for Embracing Fire is for the community to come away with shovel ready projects for smaller landowners because California has approved a half billion dollars a year in new funding for fire preparedness to prevent future catastrophic fires.

Bailey says ISF wants to see communities be “shovel ready” to access some of those funds for projects like developing shaded fuel breaks on critical ingress and egress routes into their neighborhoods; identifying and expanding important infrastructure such as water supplies for firefighting, and some communities may want to use the funding for certification programs like the “Firewise Community” planning process which help people and communities develop and implement plans over time for fire preparedness.

He mentioned the reality that California currently has an unknown number of fire refugees. He guessed the number of Californians who cannot return home, and who have to rebuild their lives in another town or possibly in other states to be in the thousands.

Bailey delved into the complexity of appropriate management of wildland fires because the best solutions to them can be somewhat counter-intuitive given the terrifying experience of an uncontrollable fire.

Despite real and reasonable fears, fire is an evolutionary factor in a healthy forest. In fact the Klamath Forest, says Bailey, has evolved in the presence of “extreme fire events.”

Simply suppressing fire is part of what has led us to this phase of extreme fire events.

Furthermore, while a ‘State of emergency’ calls for fast, decisive action, Bailey says, “California needs a long term relationship with fire on the landscape.” He also said, “Fire suppression is not sustainable,” and went on the add, “Lots of studies show ecosystems are being simplified, are losing complexity, because of the lack of fire.”

He points out that modern culture tends to speak of wildfire as “destroying the forest.” Bailey said it’s more accurate to say “fire changes the trajectory of the forest.”

Fire has a number of positive impacts, and the species of the landscape, both flora and fauna, have evolved with fire. Some seeds do not open until a fire happens. Fires open clearing for light to get to the forest floor, and fire knocks big trees into the streams contributing to stream complexity. Furthermore, dead trees have a biological function and that is interrupted by salvage logging operations.

Bailey talked about studies looking at wildland urban interface zones for forest ecosystem integrity. From an ecological standpoint, species need to be able to have holding places where they have the elements they need along the corridor of a bio-region they inhabit. He said important legacy elements of the native forest are in small parcels and would be well served by healthy fire activity.

Tim Bailey said, that though “California has declared an emergency, we still have a long learning curve to know how to deal with fire.”

Not all fires are equal. A cool, slow moving fire is generally seen as productive from a forest management perspective. It clears the understory of fallen branches and other dead wood while it gives nutrients to the soil in the form of biochar and potash and tends to leave trees alive and well.

Fire is a natural part of the landscape, and the long time residents of the region, the native people first, and European ranchers afterward, had a routine of setting fire intentionally when the conditions were right for a controlled healthy fire and to prevent catastrophic fire.

California’s emergency declaration comes with a stated goal of fire fuel reduction on a half million acres a year mostly in federal forests, however, CalFire, BLM and CalTrans are also earmarked in the funding according to Bailey.

Bailey said that owners of small parcels have a harder time getting the attention of the agencies “because there are known challenges just because there are more owners and interest groups.” Landowners of smaller parcels have different management needs and inherently more complex process because each landowner has his or her own needs.

At the same time, “the stewardship potential of the homestead parcels should not be overlooked” he says. And he said, “Small landowners, if self motivated, can make big and important changes to their land’s fire ecology through simple means.”

Embracing Fire Day at the Mateel will feature technical panel discussions and live demonstrations of various technology instrumental in managing fire on the landscape in ways that are healthy for people as well as the forests.

One example includes battery operated equipment that will be on display by David Booth, a former KMUD Environment Show host and longtime ISF member, who uses them for his homestead because they can be charged with alternative energies and because they have less probability of starting a wildland fire.

In the meantime, home and land owners will learn the best skills and technology for preventing combustion of their homes, the difference between fire fuel reduction and harmful actions.

Furthermore, Bill and Gayle Eastwood of the Southern Humboldt Fire Safe Council will be on hand to help small landowners learn about marking and reporting fire water sources on their property, and will tell landowers about available funding for fire fuel reduction and fire prevention infrastructure and how to utilize it.

One key technology on Bailey’s mind is the intersection of soil health for carbon sequestration, fire fuel reduction and bio-char creation. ISF’s Gray Shaw will be showing landowners bio-char kilns in various sizes and explaining how bio char holds moisture in the soil while it sequesters carbon for decades if not centuries.

Don’t forget–the Embracing Fire event runs from 10-6 on the May 11 at the Mateel Community Center.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Willie Caso-Mayhem
Guest
4 years ago

🕯🌳Sorry if I upset people by responding to a reporter’s hard work but I just think it’s respectful.

Ann Hall
Guest
Ann Hall
4 years ago

Ignore the Negative Nellies out there. Despite the trolls I find the comments section of these articles to be almost as informative as the articles themselves. Well, most of the time, anyway. I appreciate the wildly (spelling intentional) varied opinions.

Sparklemahn
Guest
Sparklemahn
4 years ago

I appreciate your comments, Willie. Thanks.

Willie Caso-Mayhem
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Sparklemahn

🕯🌳Thank you.🖖

MikeyC
Guest
MikeyC
4 years ago

Trump is right to withhold federal emergency funds for fires if California can’t figure this out themselves. It’s really a simple problem to build fire breaks and controlled burn during the off-season. This Bailey guy (who knows what he’s talking about) and everyone else in the scientific community know how simple a problem it is and have become frustrated with how little has been done to solve it. With each passing fire season, more blood is on the hands of all the idiots in Sacramento and the leadership at CalFire that haven’t budgeted time and resources for controlled burning and fire breaks, and instead have pushed policies of fire suppression. And then of course the state says ‘pity us’ and we call CalFire heroes when the fire comes and they aren’t prepared (don’t get me wrong, the people fighting the fires are, but the management of CalFire is not).

Obviously the greater public doesn’t see it this way because of their lack of scientific understanding of the fire ecosystem, but hopefully they start to, and hold these officials responsible. Please do your part to spread the word and demand firebreaks from your local officials if you live in a threatened area. If you can controlled burn your property, consider doing that.

Willie Caso-Mayhem
Guest
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeyC

🕯🌳I will agree with “not my potus “on the fact we need to get out there and manage the underbrush and trash. But then you run into all them illegal grows a that’s were the problem starts.

Dave Kahan
Guest
Dave Kahan
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeyC

I agree with your basic premise, Mr. MikeyC, that we need more fuel breaks and prescribed fire. But my experience and observation is that it is anything but simple. My forestry crew has thinned over 1000 acres in SoHum and created over 20 miles of regionally strategic shaded fuel breaks on major roads and ridges. It’s pretty damn complicated to line up all the ducks to pull off projects like that as well as prescribed fires. Issues like overlapping jurisdictions (fed, state, private, etc) plague both types of projects. Prescribed fire is usually much less expensive per acre than thinning, but has its own issues like narrow windows of opportunity to burn both safely and effectively at the same time, and public concerns over escape from control and smoke (particularly from elderly and respiratory-challenged folks). A few years ago BLM wanted to burn a small (forgive my memory, 100 acres or so?) patch on the northern boundary of the King Range and the NIMBYist neighbors had a hissy fit. So then they masticated it instead and the neighbors howled with protest over how ugly it looked.
The most direct thing each individual can do is take some personal responsibility to create effective defensible space around their homes and homesteads IN CONJUNCTION with fire hardening their homes so they’re resistant to igniting in the first place. Look out for the 3rd edition of Living With Wildfire in NW California, which has just been completed and should be out any time now, for details on how to make it happen. And I like your suggestion about burning our parcels. Living With Fire… also has info on the Humboldt County Prescribed Burn Association, which is made up of locals helping each other make this happen.
I couldn’t disagree more strongly, however, with your support for Trump’s misinformed bellyaching about withholding funding for suppression. See my other comment below about seeking the balance to support this statement.
And Kym, please notify me of whoever would like to discuss this further non-publicly and I’d be happy to have that conversation.

Faro
Guest
Faro
4 years ago

Mikey pretty much hit the nail on the head, we know what to do but it’s just a lack of budgeting. There should be like hundreds of crews (with dozens of people in each one) working year round doing firebreaks and controlled burns.

The workshop sounds amazing, I’ve always wanted to clear all the brush on 40 acres and make it look like a park. Maybe someday I’ll have the time.

Willow Creeker
Guest
Willow Creeker
4 years ago
Reply to  Faro

I was wondering if they are making money available to small landowners to do the work themselves to thin and make firebreaks on their land?
A lot of these homestead fourtys are old logging land, with a lot of even aged timber that is a tinder box.
Now there is a economic boost that a lot of people could use during this economic downturn.

Dave Kahan
Guest
Dave Kahan
4 years ago
Reply to  Willow Creeker

Yes – Cal Fire has the CFIP program, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS, part of the US Dept of Agriculture) has the EQUIP program, and the Humboldt County Fire Safe Council is seeking funding to continue the very successful FLASH program. All of these offer cost-share subsidies (not outright grants) to help defray part of the costs of these treatments. And they’re all administered locally by top-notch folks.

Guest
Guest
Guest
4 years ago

When the government (either Federal or Stare for local) has clearly done what they do is for the direct benefit of the people they demand payment from, I’ll take their advice. Mostly I’be seen that they treat some people as the piggy bank for what they want to do, whether for poor or for rich people, irrationally dumping money in fruitless experiments where only non profit employee getting the grant actually profit. And the more they have regulated, the worse they make it. Remember the Fire Prevention Fee? The one that is only suspended?

Dave Kahan
Guest
Dave Kahan
4 years ago

Greetings, neighbors – I agree with much of what is said here but not all. To be fair and open minded on the matter, some of my concern may be with Mr. Bailey’s comments but I have to hold open the possibility of him being misquoted and/or misinterpreted (which has happened to me in the past although not with this reporter). In terms of credibility to comment here (and perhaps bias as well), I have been involved in wildland fire management since 1981; including several years with federal hotshot crews where I worked on wildfires in every western state except Hawaii, plus one trip to Tennessee and North Carolina. Fire ecology was one of the topics I studied in college and on my own, afterward. I’ve been involved with the Southern Humboldt Fire Safe Council since its inception in 2002 (although I speak here as an individual, not for the organization). And I was part of an amazing and eclectic group of folks who founded ISF and served on its board of directors for the full six years allowed by its bylaws. To further illustrate my perspective, I strayed from the “suppression world” in the late ’80’s partly due to some disillusionment with some of the effects of our efforts. However, the situation today is very different from what it was then. Back then, we rarely came upon a home. Since then, the prevalence of the “wildland-urban interface (wui) has risen to become a major factor (migraine headache) in fire management, progressive or otherwise. And without offering judgement on its existence one way or the other, the reality is that the widely dispersed residential development patterns of SoHum make our community a poster child for wui problems. When I returned to the suppression world in the mid-90’s homes and other infrastructure were everywhere, I felt proud to be part of the effort to protect them, and I found that the suppression agencies had begun to learn from mistakes of the past, and had begun to evolve (and continue to do so) in their approaches in an attempt to achieve balance.
I completely agree that suppression in general has helped fuel loadings to rise to unacceptable levels in addition to depleting ecological health. I also agree that the level of beneficial fires needs to be increased dramatically and have supported that for decades. However, I also believe strongly that it is necessary and right to protect homes and communities, and to seek a balance between the ecological benefits of “good fires” and public safety. To state “Fire suppression is not sustainable,” without clearly addressing and supporting the balance seems to me both irresponsible and dangerous. I would be very surprised if Mr. Bailey would be unappreciative of highly competent suppression efforts if the fire was threatening his house.
Furthermore, I have attended three sessions of the extremely well presented “Klamath Fire Ecology Symposiums.” The statement, ‘…the Klamath Forest, says Bailey, has evolved in the presence of “extreme fire events.” ‘ seems to me misleading in its insinuation. My understanding is that more frequent, less intense fires dominated the Klamath fire regime prior to the effects of suppression. Of course, more extreme events did occur, but I suspect not to the extent suggested by this quote.
And finally, Ms. Lincoln’s statement, “A cool, slow moving fire…clears the understory of fallen branches and other dead wood…and tends to leave trees alive and well.” contradicts her earlier statement, “…fire knocks big trees into the streams contributing to stream complexity. Furthermore, dead trees have a biological function…”. Even a less intense fire can and does kill understory shrubs and trees, which was the major reason most of the early explorers and settlers to this region commented on the “open and park-like conditions of the forest understory.” Yes, even cooler fires usually kill some larger trees and patches of trees. This results in a mosaic of different fire effects and contributes to complexity, the depletion of which Mr. Bailey rightly bemoans.
In summation, I suspect we’re essentially on the same page but my concern over the clarity of such an important message prompted me to comment today. Thanks for the opportunity and I’ll see you all at the Mateel on 5/11. And by the way, the poster says the event begins at 9:00 but the article says 10:00.

Ben Round
Guest
Ben Round
4 years ago

Isn’t our own Tracy Katelman the new state coordinator of the Fire Safe Council? If so, can she help guide us to (continue to developing creative solutions and) get some of that funding)?

Dave Kahan
Guest
Dave Kahan
4 years ago
Reply to  Ben Round

Yes, Tracy recently accepted the position of executive director of the California Fire Safe Council. She also spearheaded the third edition of Living With Wildfire in NW California referenced above:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N3f19P1HX48u92Aj8bTEO_V1ewAtqJWJ/view?usp=sharing
So the answer to both of your questions is yes, and I don’t recall but I think the document has info on funding.

MaryAlice
Guest
MaryAlice
4 years ago

This event is not on the Mateel calendar. The poster says 9 am and the text at the end of the description says 10 am. Does anyone know the particulars of this event?

Kym Kemp
Admin
4 years ago
Reply to  MaryAlice
Central HumCo
Guest
4 years ago

~i don’t think the firefighters and most of the public have a clue what they’re up against. We already know there won’t be body counts.