Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services Says They Cannot Confirm a Second Case of COVID-19

Press release from the Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services:

covid-19 coronavirusA second case of COVID-19 in Humboldt County has not been confirmed because the individual involved has tested “indeterminate” for the virus.

Humboldt County Health Officer Dr. Teresa Frankovich said, “Regardless, we are managing the second individual exactly the same as the confirmed case as we have from the start.”

As announced last week, Humboldt County has one confirmed case of COVID-19 in a local resident. Both the positive and indeterminate sets of results were confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 

The ill individuals are doing well and continue to remain in isolation at home while being monitored for symptoms by the Humboldt County Department of Health & Human Services Public Health Branch Communicable Disease Surveillance and Control Unit. 

Frankovich said home isolation is the preferred management approach for people who do not need hospital-level care. “It both conserves our health care resources and decreases the risk of exposures to health care workers, other patients and the community,” she said.

As noted by the CDC, the potential public health threat posed by COVID-19 is high, both globally and to the United States. The fact that this disease has caused illness, including illness resulting in death, and sustained person-to-person spread in some countries has health officials concerned. 

Frankovich stated that there is much the scientific community does not yet know about this virus and how it behaves, but more is learned every day. “We do know that it can cause mild, flu-like symptoms in some people and severe respiratory symptoms in others. We also know that the risk of getting the infection is dependent on exposure. Due to the current limited number of cases in the U.S., the risk of exposure for the general public remains low at this time, according to the CDC.

Frankovich said, “Let’s face it, going forward, the big question most of us in the U.S. have is, ‘how worried do I need to be about this outbreak?’ Unfortunately, the answer right now is not clear. Many factors determine how big an impact a new virus strain may have.” The CDC says the most important are:

  • Clinical severity, or how serious is the illness associated with infection.
  • When an outbreak occurs, typically it is the most vulnerable individuals—those who are older or have a chronic disease—who become ill first. Only the sickest come to medical attention. This means that the people most likely to be counted are also the most likely to fare poorly, so initial death rates appear high. Frankovich said because of the speed at which COVID-19 unfolded in China, and the need to deal with the seriously ill first, it is likely there are thousands of individuals with only mild, cold-like symptoms who have never been included in case counts. 

    “Bottom line, to really know what percent of people who have the infection actually die from it, you need a pretty good idea of how many people actually had the infection,” Frankovich said. “This information will become more clear over time and particularly as we are able to evaluate outcome information from additional countries, including our own.”

  • Transmissibility, or how easily the pandemic virus spreads from person-to-person. 
  • In China and some other countries, there is clearly transmission occurring at the community level. This means individuals who have no known exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19 have become ill. To date, this is not occurring in the U.S., but this will very likely change over time, according to the CDC.  

  • And, finally, is there effective treatment or a vaccine to prevent the infection?
  • The CDC states that there is currently no vaccine to prevent COVID-19. Scientists are working hard to change that situation, but it will take some time. Fortunately, Frankovich said our health care systems offer excellent supportive care for ill individuals. Anti-viral medication for use is also being investigated. 

    Right now, the approach of quarantining individuals with exposures and monitoring them for symptoms, as well as isolating individuals who are confirmed cases, is intended to slow the spread of illness in the U.S., Frankovich said. Slowing spread gives the scientific community time to study this infection and develop effective strategies for containing, treating and eventually preventing infection through vaccination.

    “The world has become a much smaller place due to air travel which can take us across the planet in hours,” Frankovich said. “COVID-19 is not the first and will not be the last new virus strain to emerge, and that is why continual surveillance for emerging illnesses and maintaining or expanding our capacity to respond is so critical to the health and safety of our communities.”

    For more information about COVID-19, please call Public Health during normal business hours at 707-445-6200, or visit Humboldt Health Alert at www.humboldtgov.org/HumboldtHealthAlert.

    Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

    Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

    Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    16 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    onlooker
    Guest
    onlooker
    4 years ago

    There have been rumors of a COVID patient in SoHum. Ant truth to that?

    Dog
    Guest
    Dog
    4 years ago
    Reply to  onlooker

    The known case lives up in Maple Creek east of Arcata..

    Go Bernie
    Guest
    Go Bernie
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Dog

    SF has declared an emergency with the same amount of confirmed cases. Humboldt is hiding an outbreak here until after the election next week. There’s no such thing as an “indeterminate” case of COVID-19. You either test positive or negative. The County knows this is a confirmed case. The public is being misled.

    SARS-cov-2
    Guest
    SARS-cov-2
    4 years ago
    Reply to  onlooker

    First person to person transmission in United States .Hospital staff exposed similar as UCSF earlier this month .Those front line hospital workers cannot be exposed! We don’t have extras to spare.

    https://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/newly-diagnosed-coronavirus-patient-being-treated-at-uc-davis-medical-center/

    Someone knows
    Guest
    Someone knows
    4 years ago

    A peer was in st Joe’s, eureka, and was told by hospital staff, that 2 people with the virus were in the hospital at that time. This was just a couple days ago. The cdc will not reply to emails or answer those questions on the phone. Does the cdc only answer to who they want? Our tax dollars fund them, yet they wont tell us? I understand not creating panic, but knowing is preparing. I think local cdc should face criminal charges if this is accurate.

    Marc
    Guest
    Marc
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Someone knows

    Wow! Criminal charges for not providing you information that you demand because you are a taxpayer? File a FOIA request, or STFU. I suppose you feel entitled to top secret intelligence briefings from the National Intelligence Director, too? If you’re not prepared it isn’t the CDC’s fault, it’s yours.

    Someone knows
    Guest
    Someone knows
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Marc

    Are you an idiot? You are supporting overpaid govt agencies not doing there job. [edit]

    Hopeless
    Guest
    Hopeless
    4 years ago

    Home isolation is the best method cause nowhere in the area is set up for such an issue. Hopefully local emergency services do not fail as they prove to regularly do

    Willie Caos-mayham
    Guest
    4 years ago

    🕯🌳”not my potus ” won’t divert money from the WALL to fight the virus but he’ll steal it from the Ebola patients. 🚑🚑🕊🕊

    GO TRUMP LETS MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
    Guest
    GO TRUMP LETS MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
    4 years ago

    You mean when Monsanto caused the outbreak and covered it up with the Ebola name.

    Guest
    Guest
    Guest
    4 years ago

    Except of course Trump had nothing to do with it. “Most of the funding comes from a one-time, five-year emergency package that Congress approved to respond to the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa… That money is slated to run out by September 2019.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/02/01/cdc-to-cut-by-80-percent-efforts-to-prevent-global-disease-outbreak/

    And “For the first time, an unlicensed Ebola vaccine tested in clinical trials during the West African outbreak was offered to health care workers (HCWs) and other front line workers (FLWs) working in facilities bordering the outbreak areas in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) under “compassionate use.”

    https://blogs.cdc.gov/global/2019/04/19/i-have-seen-ebola-now-you-have-a-vaccine/

    “For now, there is no reason for alarm. Despite the unprecedentedly large Ebola epidemic in West Africa, which infected 28,000 people and killed 11,000 between 2014 and 2016, most Ebola outbreaks have been small and contained affairs. Several have involved handfuls of cases. Already, experts from the World Health Organization, Doctors Without Borders, and local Congolese health institutes have traveled to Bikoro. The CDC is supporting local public health partners, and the WHO is planning to deploy more personnel and protective equipment, and has released $1 million from a contingency fund to help stop the outbreak.” https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/05/ebola-returns-to-the-congo-just-as-trump-decides-to-rescind-ebola-funds/560012/ Although this article goes on to complain that Trump’s call to Congress to use some of these money is “short sighted”, it will be Congress who comes up with the money. Or not. But despite starting out with “For now, there is no reason for alarm ” , the author goes on to bash Trump for wanting the money to deal with urgent covid-19 needs here now until Congress gets it together to meet his emergency funding request.. Because, like so many people like to do, it’s a handle on the never ending goal to bash Trump without regard to the fact that money taken to “build a wall” could not be spent for other things anyway. Of course if Trump did that, the Democrats would probably start new impeachment proceedings because he exceeded his authority. Because that is what the Democrats want to spend money doing.

    HotCoffee
    Guest
    HotCoffee
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Guest

    Guest, It’s nice to see someone that looks for facts instead of running with political feelings!

    I hope everyone on both sides of politics prepares as best they can, just in case.
    Gee, what if we found a reason to work and care about this together.

    People really can disagree without hating each other…try it you just might like it.

    That being said I really don’t trust any politicians to take care of me above their own interests.

    Trump is the POTUS ..so….

    My question to you is do you hate Trump enough to try to stop him from trying to contain the virus?

    I hope not.

    DELLIB
    Guest
    DELLIB
    4 years ago
    SARS-cov-2
    Guest
    SARS-cov-2
    4 years ago

    Fellow citizens the congress was briefed on SARS-cov-2 in a top secret setting .Americas health and this virus ,a top secret issue .

    https://kiwaradio.com/local-news/grassley-attends-top-secret-briefing-on-coronavirus-its-worldwide-impact/

    Statewide Iowa — (RI) — Iowa’s senior senator took part in what he says was a “top secret” briefing in a congressional chamber Tuesday morning to discuss the impact of the coronavirus.

    In a conference call with Iowa reporters, Senator Chuck Grassley didn’t want to reveal many details of the briefing but did say he met with officials from several federal agencies involved with public health. Grassley downplayed the security level of the meeting.

    HotCoffee
    Guest
    HotCoffee
    4 years ago

    Lets hope nothing takes hold in SF.

    The numbers are in: SF homeless population rose 30% since 2017
    Photo of Kevin Fagan
    Kevin Fagan July 8, 2019 Updated: July 25, 2019 5:50 p.m.

    San Francisco now has 9,784 unhoused residents compared with the last biennial count taken in 2017 of 7,499, according to the report. But the city pegged the latest total, based on a one-night tally taken in January, at 8,011, the same number revealed in the May report.

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/The-numbers-are-in-SF-homeless-population-rose-14080982.php

    The least able to prepare or control their environment.

    SF knew about epidemics back during the aids crisis and hippie days in the Haight of stds running ramped. They’ve sat back and watch drug addition and mental health issues grow.

    That might have been a great time to harden heath crisis measures. Who’s in charge? SF, LA? Where have you been? What have you been spending time & money on the last 40 years or so?

    mike
    Guest
    mike
    4 years ago

    This Humboldt case is not included in the official total of only 1 confirmed case in Cal which occurred in Solano County. Why is this case being hidden from the total ?